retro76: I guess color truly is subjective. I don't own a Pentax, but the colors from the JPEGs in this review are extremely attractive. Dpreview loves Olympus's color response (I'm a former owner of the OMD EM5) and always felt Olympus was highly artificial looking.
I agree, I have always preferred the colours I get from My Pentax system over the Nikon I have. They are somewhat richer in rendition and more pleasing to the eye, even from RAW. The Nikon just cannot match. Even some friends of mine who use CaNikons are very envious of how Pentax can produce blues. They even call it "Pentax Blue". Mind you Pentax still struggles with reds, almost overcooking them, but don't most DSLR's?
mtnredhed: Wonder what happens to Bowens? It was owned by Calumet
The same as the European stores. Business as usual.Bowens are a British registered company running under British corporate law.
offertonhatter: I spoke to one of the people at a UK branch today. They are unaffected by this. I don't know how this works if your parent company in the US goes under yet the UK arm is unaffected, surely it would be considered an asset. I guess some legal bod in business law would know how this works.
I am glad though, as the UK stores are very good, and I always go there for studio equipment as there is not many other places around.
Thanks for that Nick.
I spoke to one of the people at a UK branch today. They are unaffected by this. I don't know how this works if your parent company in the US goes under yet the UK arm is unaffected, surely it would be considered an asset. I guess some legal bod in business law would know how this works.
jaygeephoto: Perhaps "signature" leather or other finishes associated with other high profile name brands would be the way to go here. If you're going down this route at least have some look associated with a brand that has some cache, not some silly box of crayon colors. Imagine the cameras in Porsche Cayman red leather with a neck strap the same color as the yellow seat belts! Look, Hasselblad made a Ferrari red edition of it's camera. You can see one (in captivity) at the Dubai mall, if you're interested. But I digress. April 1st is coming up fast; so get busy with your best Photoshop or Solidworks skills and make something truly interesting.
yardcoyote, they started during the Gordon Bennett cup in 1900. Ironically USA was Red and Italy only adopted it in 1907. Now going with racing colours how about the Orange and Blue Gulf Colours of the 60's onwards. now THAT would be a great scheme for a camera :-) Oh hold on you can get that combo for the Q10 and K50. So Fuji, why not give us the X-Pro1 in the same combo?
Chris Noble: Interesting article! "When Sigma was founded there were over 50 lens manufacturers in Japan. Now there are only really three major ones - Tamron, Cosina and Sigma. We have survived because we make unique products. "
I wonder how many camera-branded lenses are actually made by these 3.
Focal, the two lenses you mentioned were co-designed with Pentax, and as such are still available on the Pentax mount (as Pentax lenses). Why Tokina dropped these two stunning lenses, and yes they are stunning, under their own name for the other mounts is beyond me. I certainly know a lot of APS-C CaNikon users who would love to have the 50-135 lens for their camera.
Markol: So let the awards-war begin!(Remember, there are only 2 possible categories of DSLRs- silver or gold ;-))
I thought Nikon ones came in Black or dark red? (Sorry could not resist) :-)
MrLuffy: FA 31,43 and 77 lenses are not supported?
Thanks, missed that. ;-)
thx1138: $600 for a freakin' 1.4x TC is ridiculous. Street price needs to be half that.
Good point Audio. I believe from Canon user friends that the TC's are sealed. I don't know about the Nikon ones.Third party ones are not sealed from experience.
Where does it say max format size 35mm? I don't see it in the text.Anyway it is a DA type converter. DA=APS-C digital. Still Pentax users do know that certain DA lenses will work with FF without issue, certain lenses will not. All I can say is that unless the lens stated of the OP are tried with the converter, there is no guarantee that the will work with it. Only by trying will a tog know......
From what I am reading, it is a DA (ie Digital only) converter, rather than an FA converter. From this I think I can deduce that it will work with the FA limiteds you mentioned, but only on APS-C Digital bodies. The proof will be someone giving it a go on a Pentax Film camera to see it if vignettes. Pentax/Ricoh appear to just cover themselves for film users. (Until the FF Pentax appears :-) )
In the UK it is still £20-30 less than the Canon version. Still it is £80 more than the Nikon version. Mind you the Canon is quite recent and the Nikon one is now a few years old. So yes, it is a steep price, but compared to others, it is not bad. Street price will probably drop.
completelyrandomstuff: I don't know if dropping Pentax name is such a good idea for them, but I am sure they have done their market research...
They did state back in 2012, that the Ricoh name will be for Fixed lens cameras, and interchangable lens cameras will be Pentax. These are just the first examples of this decision.
Innovation from Pentax. A Tiltable LCD screen for the next Gen 645D. I like the idea.
Actually, on certain Pentax Forums, that was the ballpark price for this (between £300 and £400). So in the end it seems to be spot on.
I will still get one, I have a funny feeling that it will be superb with my DA*300mm F4.
The first product of what Ricoh is planning. Fixed lens camera (compacts) are badged Ricoh, Interchangable ones are branded Pentax.
offertonhatter: It does not work for the QX10. In spite of it saying for both QX10 and QX100 at the top of the web page, when you try to update the QX10, it says it is incompatible.......Sony, please make your mind up, or at the very least bring out the firmware that does work for the QX10.
I have since found a Sony page with the QX10 firmware:-
It does not work for the QX10. In spite of it saying for both QX10 and QX100 at the top of the web page, when you try to update the QX10, it says it is incompatible.......Sony, please make your mind up, or at the very least bring out the firmware that does work for the QX10.
DP review, are you sure the price status should be 30th January 2013?
mgblack74: I guess getting sued by Nikon wasn't enough. Now it's Sony's turn.
I would not be at all surprised if the SL10 is in fact just a re-badged QX10 licenced by JK from Sony, even made by Sony for JK. The picture clearly shows the buttons are in the very same place. Also, calling the lens PIXPRO may indicate a better optical design, just like the Sony G series (which the QX10 has)