SirLataxe

SirLataxe

Lives in United Kingdom NW England, United Kingdom
Works as a Retired IT architect
Joined on Jan 2, 2010
About me:

Cabinet maker, cyclist, archer, body-boarder, classical guitar learner. Slave to two collies and the ladywife.

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (740 comments in total)

Very nice - but lacking in two essentials: no articulating screen and no facility to mount a wide angle conversion lens.

An articulated screen would make the camera so much more useful, especially for close-ups, street photography and video, where taking the pictures from waist or lower level makes such a difference.

A high quality add-on WA lens would make the camera an ideal tool for landscapes taken during longer walks in difficult terrain, where the weight of a larger camera and lenses would be tedious.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 13:17 UTC as 80th comment | 14 replies
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS5 Review preview (72 comments in total)

Quoted from the review:

"As is the case with all compact cameras, you'd be able to get technically better results from the TS5 if Raw mode was available, but that's not a feature you'll find in the rugged/waterproof class, for understandable reasons".

What are these "understandable reasons" to omit RAW from such cameras? I have the previous model and I want it to take RAW so I can use it for wet/sandy beach landscapes without suffering the tedious jpeg smudging of detail.

And what is the point of having 16MP if any detail captured by this pixel-dense sensor is smeared away by the jpeg processor yet cannot be got-at via RAW?

SirLataxe, also not requiring the spurious wifi and GPS stuff. (What next - a built-in printer to make postage stamp-size prints)?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2013 at 08:37 UTC as 34th comment

The poll is flawed as I have concerns around the first three of the bullet points but can only select one of them.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 20:21 UTC as 849th comment | 1 reply
On Compositional Rules article (120 comments in total)

The rule of thirds is easily applied, if required, in a camera viewfinder. This is not so for the golden mean and diagonal arrangements as described in this article.

Unless there is a long-winded studio photographic session, how are such rules to be applied in practice? Surely these latter compositional rules are only practical in graphic design and similar non-photographic image compositions, where the author may take his time rather than having to capture a moment.

The article also fails to mention any number of other simple yet effective rules for photographic composition, such as the use of various lead-in lines, stoppers at the photo periphery, symmetry for reflected scenes and other human-pleasing ways to keep the eye interested and involved with the elements of a photo.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2012 at 21:34 UTC as 32nd comment | 3 replies
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4