ncsakany: Makes total sense to me. Greedy photographer got put back in his right place.
i believe the correct term for this is "pwned".
that moment when the correct legal interpretation looks like trolling. u mad, bros?
Steve: For those confused North or South Americans. These images are accurate.There is NO COLOR in Europe. Any images or footage you see commercially, are colorized post production. I brought a box of Kodachrome to europe in '75You should have seen the looks i got.. I asked where the mcDonalds was in Russia.. I asked for the Golden Arches resto with the hamburgers.. "OH," someone exclaimed "You mean the hamburger place with the Neutral Gray arches !!!!"
and that's why European settlers moved to the Americas.
maxnimo: I didn't know water causes a camera to lose color. Bummer.
i think it's because he used a B&W memory card.
Mssimo: He did a great job with focus.
do DSLRs (which i assume is the type of camera that was used) have face detection? unless it was operating in live view mode, how does that even work?
DaveE1: I understand that the monkey is filing a "Forget Me" takedown request following the new European Court ruling. Get your comments in quickly. This article may not be here for long.
that monkey should be given EU citizenship and a place in the EU parliament. he has proven his intelligence and good taste, not to mention his good looks.
backayonder: The Monkey takes quite a good photo and will be available for lessons if anyone is interested. cost is peanuts
how big is this monkey anyway? is there a picture of him next to a banana, for scale approximation?
seans1969: I wish my selfie's were that good.
correct (except for that apostrophe). the images look too well framed to be taken by a monkey. or maybe it was just the beginner's luck.
the best part of the article is the "why should i care" in the title. i don't think the question has been fully answered - there's no comparison between sensor size/DOF/total light and the camera owner's worth as a human being. the main problem is: how much more valuable is a person using a FF camera than one using a m4/3?
i like the technical information, though, thank you for that.
dubstylz: To me, Every photo should tell some kind of a story (no matter how small). I can't work out the story here!
that sounds like a Marilyn Manson song.
once upon a time, there was a colored liquid. one day, it decided to go on a trip and see the world.
Zoron: I am getting D900...not this incremental upgrade....who's with me?
more thousands, more future!
"Waiting for D1000 ... :-)"
why not skip ahead to the D3000 line?
allanjfotos: WHERE'S THE 4K?
the 4K is in the Panasonic and Sony cameras.
jackf00: STILL NO REVIEW for Panasonic GH4 nor first impression review 5 month after announcement and 2 month after sale !
ONLY a short one page Qucik summary published for the Panasonic new flagship !How is this possible ? What as shame !!
Why this poor treatment for Panasonic product, as for the previous review of the GH3 only provided 7 month after annoucement and 5 month after sale !!
maybe they took some 4K video and are still rendering the footage.
Dave Hanson: Sorry, Tamrac may be good, but they've never been "affordable." Just for the record, Tamrac is (was) my bag of choice.
i find them more affordable than ThinkTank, at least where i live.
utomo99: Camera War:
1. Mega Pixel War, and it is Over. 2. Longer Zoom war, almost over. 3. Bigger Sensor War, Still running. 4. Better Sensitivity. So we can take Good picture on Low light. I hope it will start Next year.
5. dynamic range war - just wait for it.
Artistico: I have been wondering when this super zoom would make its way to M43. I also find it a bit interesting from the point of view that one would normally expect this to be an IS lens (Or VR, as Tamron would call it).
I think it is about time Panasonic starts following the strength of the trend, making IBIS standard too, and drop OIS from their new lenses, or they are going to lag behind the others.
It probably seemed a good idea at the time, but I think they'd make more money in the long run. M43 being a universal mount, there is less incentive to stay with the brand than how it has been for Nikon and Canon and their choice to keep IS in lenses.
In order to have the best selection of lenses for M43, one needs both Panasonic and Olympus ones. Not having IBIS is a compromise that will make people more likely to choose Olympus bodies over Panasonic.
i'm not saying that i don't want some stabilization on the 25mm in low light, i'm saying that i can make do without it - it's not a deal breaker with that particular lens.
i am curious about the advantages and disadvantages of 2 and 3 axis IBIS relative to the OIS. everybody praises the 5 axis version, but not many people brag about the lower end models.
Marty4650: As usual, someone has already checked the "I had it".....
It's really amazing how fast people can buy and sell a lens the day it is announced.
i've had it with the "i had it" button!