aleksdat

Joined on Nov 22, 2011

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On article Review: Nokia 808 PureView (349 comments in total)

Good start for new tendention, IMHO!

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2012 at 13:01 UTC as 64th comment
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot SX150 IS review (85 comments in total)

This Camera have Sony CCD 1/2.3", but G10 1/1.7" - so what did balico have to say about Canon developers?

Link | Posted on May 15, 2012 at 14:17 UTC as 21st comment
On article Pentax announces K-01 K-mount APS-C mirrorless camera (874 comments in total)

The only achievement of this camera in comparison with an slr camera is the lower cost of production due to absence of expensive mechanics lift the mirror and additional sensors for metering and autofocus. The manageability and handability of the grip have sharply decreased, also the design proved to be a suitable only for a narrow segment of buyers. It reminds me of artillery fire registration around classic without slr cameras: Q - undershoot, K - flight. So the target can get before the Canon, for which, as it seems, Nikon and Pentax conduct free research of the without slr cameras market

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 13:33 UTC as 355th comment
On article Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact (776 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anirban Banerjee: Lens is too slow at 60mm (120mm equivalent).

Too slow compare to what?

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 15:44 UTC
On article Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact (776 comments in total)
In reply to:

andersf: Looks awesome. What I don't understand is why they decided on a 4:3 sensor? 3:2 or even 16:9 would have made more sense.

Composition rarely requires a square frame, and cutting the top of the frame, we will use significantly less space than if the picture was originally a rectangular

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 15:02 UTC
On article Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact (776 comments in total)
In reply to:

Flashback: I agree why not 3:2?

3/2 requires a larger lens with equal diagonal

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 14:57 UTC
On article Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact (776 comments in total)
In reply to:

dmanthree: What a curious camera. While it looks nice, why would I buy this instead of something with interchangeable lenses? The f2.8 aperture is nice, but it vanishes quickly as the zoom extends.

Firstly,EVIL are not so small as this one except with prime pancake only; secondly, EVIL kit lens are not faster, but at most of focal lengths G1X's optics faster than most of the zoom lenses. As a second camera and/or the camera for constant carrying with myself, this one is far preferable (giving greater flexibility in use with the small size, which covers most of the typical cases)

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 14:54 UTC
On article Variation Facts and Fallacies (230 comments in total)

It' a TRUTH!:))

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2011 at 20:00 UTC as 127th comment

Improvement in pictures of the 7100 are insignificant in comparison with the predecessor, and JPEG-engine frankly surprised with shift red tones in the brick-and-orange. I believe that the "old man" Canon still is the leader among the advanced on equipment compact cameras. Taking into account the maximum aperture of the S100, it was on a one stop wins in detail, especially in JPEG. This is clearly seen on a white letters at red paper. Also G12 and S100 have a wider dynamic range. Disappointed only optics S100, very soft on the right and in general impression beck-focus on the whole plane. However, a large sensor with a small number of pixels is better than any minor brothers:)

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2011 at 13:02 UTC as 14th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9