marc petzold: Nice Info about that particular picture background, i was happy to read it,more of that, please. That composition looks very good to my eyes.
Apart from that, the Canon 16-35 L II Lens wasn't that good reviewed at lenstip, for example:
Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L II USM11. Summary
solid, sealed barrel, excellent image quality in the frame centre, chromatic aberration sensibly controlled, only slight distortion, taking into account the focal lengths range, low astigmatism, low vignetting level, very quick, silent and accurate autofocus, lens hood and a case included.
unacceptable image quality at frame edge in the aperture range from f/2.8-4.0, average work against bright light, bad price/quality ratio.
Erez, I have learned a lot from your articles. Thanks for sharing. By revealing your uncropped panoramic, you open up an interesting discussion of composition. I hope you don't mind: I downloaded your photoshop comp and made an alternative crop that, to my taste, creates a compelling context at the edges. I'd appreciate it if you would take a quick look and comment on why you preferred to remove this context? Please let me know if you would prefer me not to post a crop of your work, and I will remove it - I certainly don't mean any disrespect. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwM3NbOCw4HcS1dpVGJ6aFdGMFk&authuser=0
G1Houston: Please add built-in flash and touch screen (with touch AF) to the next version of the A7, and put a bigger battery in. In terms of battery life, the Nikon D750 rated with the flash on can shoot 1200 shots ...
Agree re: Touch. I use a NEX 5N and love the touch feature for selecting the focus point. I'd really miss it.
The Winners are winners! Hey, DPR, isn't it about time your photo viewer offered a full-screen mode with lots of pixels and prev/next nav using arrows and arrow keys... like basically any self-respecting photo journalism site? It's painful squinting at these (on a Retina MBP) and I'm sure we're missing a lot at the res offered here.
Marcus Beard: This doesn't solve the main problem which is the non-destructive edits that most of us Aperture users have done over several years and tens of thousands of images. Fingers crossed that Photos.app will allow this
Indeed. Am I right to say that Lightroom will import rendered images (post-processed versions) because it can't replicate Aperture's effects?
Nicolas, thank you for reminding me why photography and cycling are both such great things to do... and even better together! I find your work - both the output and how you do it - inspiring. You've demonstrated that while "the journey is the reward", a more intimate approach to travel also leads to great photographic outcomes, not just technically but in meaningful human terms.
(unknown member): 'With a bicycle and a humble attitude you can travel to the heart of a culture."
I wouldn't call it "humble" to think you can actually "travel to the heart of any culture" just because you are on a bike. I'd call that naive and rather arrogant.The photos, I'm sorry to say, are also nothing really special.
Also, if you haven't already, please check his larger portfolio before writing off his work: http://www.nicolasmarino.com/gallery
dtssounds: Your landscape photographs are great, but sorry to say, your people photographs are not on the same level as your landscape. Not that they are not good, they are just not great enough when compared to your landscape photos. But I admire your adventurous heart and wish to seem more of your next travels.
If you haven't already, you should check his portfolio - it is great. Whether or not the photos are technically the ultimate (I can't say) they are wonderful portraits of people in very different worlds that us DPR readers.http://www.nicolasmarino.com/gallery
As a NEX user, am I just paranoid or is Sony basically giving up on developing any more small lightweight E-mount lenses for APS-C size cameras? They seem to be so far behind Fujifilm in terms of lens range and performance, and their roadmap is all bigger FE lenses.
Black Box: Oh, for crying out loud! Buy her a bowl of rocky road ice-cream and put on Ray Charles' "Crying time". But spare us another "unusual approach to children photography".
Is it not enough to enjoy the photos for their own sake? Not everything needs to be a critique on all photos that have gone before.
b craw: Well executed, thus charming vignettes of domesticity. Some are perhaps overly-familiar motifs - pensive child through window, something out of natural context (dog) in a photo bag, etc. - but I doubt that these endeavor to be cutting edge in terms of concept or visual outcome. They are nice, and I suspect, compelling to a large portion of the viewers here.
"not in the same league of Sally Mann's work" - call me ignorant but I much prefer these - they have soul and are delightful. By contrast Sally Mann's work seems arty to a fault.
Barney, thanks for the great article! I absolutely consider the iPhone to be a serious camera for this use case. I have been taking hand-held panoramas for literally decades, and I have always sought out small and light cameras so that I will actually have the camera with me when the panoramic opportunity reveals itself. My first panos were shot on a Yashica Samurai half-frame film camera circa late '80s, where I hand-cut a series of prints with an X-acto knife and taped them together to get the pano. I extended this habit into earlier digital cameras using stitching software. When I bought my Sony Nex-5N, I was thrilled with its panoramic mode... until I started to use my iPhone 5. The ability to capture a spacious scene with the camera in your pocket greatly increases the chance that a panoramic image will be born. I've also found that in good light my iPhone is as good or better than the Sony for my needs. The increase in quality in the 5S is impressive and noteworthy.
Paul Janders: Only in the art world can you bastardize someone else's work and be rewarded for it.
uh right - that's a large part of how art functions - by re-interpreting what has gone before.
(unknown member): Originally I was impressed by the images but the more I looked at them the more critical I have become. I think the worst one is "Migrant Mother" followed by Lincoln. It was a rainy day in Southern California and I'm not understanding the blotchy golden tone the Swedish "artist" decided to use. I had to redo the image and I think it looks much more natural.
I like your version. Why the antipathy to the other artist. She is an artist whether you like her work, or not. As are you. And what's with the "Swedish" epithet? What's your problem?
Paul B Jones: Not opposed on principle to this skill-requiring project but except for Anne Frank I don't see the colourized versions as adding anything of value to the world over the original black and whites. In fact, they look a bit like over-cooked HDR efforts.
@babalu - that is the first substantive criticism I have read in this thread, and now you call it out, I agree it's a mistake.
Zvonimir Tosic: A parody. In fact, this reminds me of the scene from the "2001: A Space Odyssey" film (yes, it was film-ed): An ape recognises a new tool. Ape grabs it and smashes everything around with it. Feels powerful, uses that tool to play, to kill prey, to kill other apes.
There is a fine line between "arghhh, I can do it", and "ought I do it?", which ape cannot recognise yet. People of 70, 100 or 150 years ago, didn't have tools we have today but they had vivid imagination to compensate and that is why those old images worked so well. Today, it seems the opposite is true.
So compared to the original "2001: A Space Odyssey", this is colour parody is same as "2001: A Space Travesty".
What, exactly, was destroyed by this creative act?
Marla2008: I beg to differ. I actually find it not only amazingly well achieved from a technical point of view, but also a very interesting alternative perception of an all important collective heritage. Replacing the originals would have been a crime, but both versions can coexist and complement each other in a very useful way. say bravo.
rfsIII: Just to be clear, for all her hard work, what this woman has done is created something called kitsch. For those of you who did not grow up in the last century, "kitsch" is a term that was first used by the Germans and it means artwork that's superficially appealing but not enlightening.
"Is a style of mass-produced art or design using cultural icons. The term is generally reserved for unsubstantial or gaudy works, or works that are calculated to have popular appeal. Kitsch mimics its immediate predecessor with no regard to ethics—it aims to copy the beautiful, not the good."
I respectfully disagree. They are well done and bring a new, imaginative, perspective to topics which in many cases could not be captured in color at the time.
Mike_Hessey: Sorry, most of these you have picked are certainly history for me. First digital camera was Nikon 900 (was it a Coolpix in those days?). Still have it somewhere. A set of best AA batteries would last, if I was very lucky, for 10 pictures, and it was S O S L O W - anything that moved at all was impossible to shoot. Later 990 was a vast improvement (compared with the 900!). Perhaps after that experience, I regard regard current 16M cameras as having achieved the 'sweet spot' in terms of IQ etc. 24M cameras (I have two) are fine as cameras, but the effect of the file size on both my 2012 Macbook Pro and 2013 PC is painful, and for my purposes (web postings, and prints up to A3+, or once 6ft by 8ft) this res is adequate.
I too wanted to put in a bad word for the Nikon Coolpix 900. Terrible battery life, horrible lack of speed, generally incredibly disappointing. I haven't forgiven Nikon, yet.
It looked like this: https://www.google.com/search?q=nikon+coolpix+900&client=firefox-a&hs=7Yf&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=fflb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=FS4UUsPHGOblyQHo9IHwAQ&ved=0CDUQsAQ&biw=1440&bih=787
simon65: Would be nice to see a picture of the G1-X up against a XXXD Canon DSLR for size comparison.
Thanks for that URL! Reveals just how chunky this new Canon is compared with the Panasonic and Sony MILCs.
jorepuusa: Lots of cameras, lots of comments about those cameras.But the main thing is missing. The visual quality of pictures taken by dpreview staffers is bad! Pictures are sadly amateurish, composition is nonexistence and there is no story in the pics.World leading site should have pleasing pictures of people holding cameras but it does not.But neither do other sites. It is a saddening truth that sites writing about cameras use pictures that are of very low visual standard.Now what does this mean?It means that people who write these laughable comments about how wrong tests or roundups are, do not understand about pictures at all cause never are the pictures estimated in these sites. So the only thing that matters are the knobs and pixels and those have nothing to do with pictures.Photography is really dying. This article and its comments are one proof about it.
DPR does some really great - I'd go so far as to say extraordinary - technical reviews which aren't available elsewhere. You can easily find vast troves of sample images on sites like Flickr if you need to evaluate image quality.