Bomple

Bomple

Joined on Dec 27, 2011

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On Compositional Rules article (120 comments in total)
In reply to:

RikMaxSpeed: I use an Olympus PEN with the "thirds grid" enabled when shooting - however Olympus have taken a slightly odd decision of narrowing the central bands, the lines are not equally spaced and the cross-points are somewhat closer to the centre of the frame - a good idea? what do you think?

I guess they did not align the grid with the rule of thirds in mind, but with the golden ratio, which is a better idea anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2012 at 12:02 UTC
In reply to:

Thoughts: I would not take photos with this camera in RAW format. It is meant to be a fun camera after all.

Having detail smeared by crappy in-camera noise reduction is fun?

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2012 at 14:22 UTC
On Photoshop CS6 Beta: New Features for Photographers article (154 comments in total)

Ooooh, the oil-paint filter, I want the oil paint filter!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2012 at 09:36 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply
On Just posted: Nikon D800 test samples article (423 comments in total)
In reply to:

antoineb: Duly shot at f11 where diffraction must be a clear issue - why?

of course the test scene needs f11 for enough DOF - but surely this cannot take precedence over the need to deliver relevant results?

as it stands, these shots at f11 will suffer from diffraction BEFORE they show limits of the sensor resolution.

therefore these are cute test shots - but they're essentially useless.

These should be re-done at f5.6

Since the D800 is full-format, it should not be diffraction limited at f11

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 10:11 UTC
On Canon announces EOS 5D Mark III 22MP full-frame DSLR article (488 comments in total)
In reply to:

METROMODEPHOTO: OH, YEAH" I WOULD LIKE TO UPGRADE FROM MY AWSOME 7D APS SENSOR TO A FULL SIZE SENSOR SOME DAY AND END THE GET THE LATEST AND THE NEWEST "RAT-RACE" SOME DAY BUT, I AM WELL DISAPPOINTED WITH THE RIDICULOUS "ONE" MORE MP 21MP 5D-2 TO A 22MP 5D-3 UPGRADE. YES,IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE SINCE NIKON OFFERED 36MP WITH THE NICE OPTION OF GOING DOWN TO 22MP FOR EXTRA FINE DETAIL AND SOME DAY IF YOU LIKE TO BLOW UP LARGE PHOTOS AND GET THE EXTRA DETAILS WELL ITS ALL THERE AND READILY AVAILABLE. ITS JUST LIKE HAVING AN SLR THAT SHOOTS HD VIDEO.I DO NOT DO VIDEO YET BUT AS I SAID BEFORE, IT IS NICE TO HAVE THE OPTION TO. "YES, OPTIONS ARE GOOD.

The key on the left side of your keyboard, above the shift key, is called caps-lock. Please press it again to turn it off.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 08:48 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bomple: Please dpreview, if that camera has the same restriction about shooting raw as the s95 and s100 (no raw in full auto and scene modes), at least mention it somewhere in the review.

This is really annoying and a big "con" for me.

I am also aware that this restriction is by design, but I think it is bad design. Is there really anyone who _wants_ his camera to switch back to jpeg when in full auto?

Let's play it the other way round: People with limited photographic experience won't switch to raw anyway.
People with big photographic experience probably want their camera to stay in raw mode even if switched to full auto.

I simply don't see why the image quality should be tied to the shooting mode in any way. It doesn't make sense.

Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 08:27 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bomple: Please dpreview, if that camera has the same restriction about shooting raw as the s95 and s100 (no raw in full auto and scene modes), at least mention it somewhere in the review.

This is really annoying and a big "con" for me.

@TJGKG: It's well hidden in the manual, the only reference I found is in the appendix, there's a table showing which setting is available in which mode. There you can see that raw is only available in the p/a/s/m modes.
And the review of the s100 consists of 15 pages, so I don't see why there shouldn't be room for one additional sentence mentioning the raw restriction.

@ecapdeville: I'm perfectly aware how to use the P mode, thank you very much. It's still no replacement for the auto mode, and it doesn't prevent anyone from switching my camera to full auto either. As I told you, I'm not the only one taking pictures with my camera.

@lightsculpture: you are wrong. Starting with the 500D canon dropped this ridiculous restriction, at least for the rebel series. From the review: "For the first time in a 'Rebel' class camera, RAW image recording is available in the 'Basic Zone' (thank you Canon)."
Thank you dpreview for mentioning it.

Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 08:21 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bomple: Please dpreview, if that camera has the same restriction about shooting raw as the s95 and s100 (no raw in full auto and scene modes), at least mention it somewhere in the review.

This is really annoying and a big "con" for me.

About the G1X: I found the manual online, prepare to be shocked. The G1X has the same pointless restriction as the s95 and s100. That means no raw in full auto or scene modes.
So why would I want this? Simply because I am not the only one taking pictures with my camera. Sometimes my wife uses it (and she has no clue how to use the P/A/S/M modes), or someone else with limited photographic experience. It would be nice to set the camera to full auto and then have the added flexibility of raw to correct whatever has gone wrong.

Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 08:41 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bomple: Please dpreview, if that camera has the same restriction about shooting raw as the s95 and s100 (no raw in full auto and scene modes), at least mention it somewhere in the review.

This is really annoying and a big "con" for me.

I doubt that the s95 and s100 are targeted for casual point and shoot users, or they wouldn't offer raw in the first place. They are meant for photographers wanting a smaller package than a dslr, but without sacrificing too much image quality or photographic control. But somehow canon has decided that us photographers are not mature enough to know when to use what image quality setting.

The main point here is that DPREVIEW DIDN'T MENTION IT in the review! Not even a single word about it.

Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 08:37 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1032 comments in total)

Please dpreview, if that camera has the same restriction about shooting raw as the s95 and s100 (no raw in full auto and scene modes), at least mention it somewhere in the review.

This is really annoying and a big "con" for me.

Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 08:34 UTC as 140th comment | 12 replies
In reply to:

voz: Raw would have been nice...

yes, raw is for those who actually can get it right in the camera, but don't like the crappy processing the cameras do and want to enhance the image quality even further. Or for those who want to do black and white conversions with channel mixing, without the limits that 8-bit jpegs impose on you.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 08:14 UTC
In reply to:

NowHearThis: The paragraphs above say *optical stabilization* but the spec list says sensor shift... which is it DPR?

Well, sensor shift _is_ a kind of optical stabilisation...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2012 at 08:07 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 review article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bomple: Hi, there's a very annoying restriction in the s95 which limits the use of raw to the P/A/S/M modes. Unfortunately this wasn't mentioned in the review of the s95.

Does anyone know if this restriction is still present in the s100?

I downloaded the manual of the s100 and the restriction is still there.
That means no raw in full auto or scene modes.

I think this should have been mentioned somewhere in the review, as this is a major flaw of the camera and severely limits the use of raw.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2012 at 16:22 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 review article (134 comments in total)

Hi, there's a very annoying restriction in the s95 which limits the use of raw to the P/A/S/M modes. Unfortunately this wasn't mentioned in the review of the s95.

Does anyone know if this restriction is still present in the s100?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 27, 2011 at 11:37 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14