AlpCns2

AlpCns2

Joined on Feb 17, 2012

Comments

Total: 199, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Operator: So many "I love this company." posts. Maybe one of you would want to buy my X-E2?

Crappy AF, crappy RAW-support, crappy flash system (onboard and off), overpriced prime lenses, overpriced and huge zoom lenses and now ... left out in the cold with firmware updates (still uses the same sensor with the same electronic like the X-T1).

That's how Fuji X buyers feel in reality after only 1,5yrs of usage. Thx Fuji, but NO thx - I'm out!

Looking at sales figures, and the success of the camera, plus the number of pros using the system - I'd say that not everybody agrees with you.

Sorry to hear it doesn't work for you. But it's way too much of a generalization to say that Fuji X buyers feel left in the cold and that most of the hardware and software is overpriced "crap". I'd say that the vast majority loves these cameras, and with good reason.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 18:45 UTC
On Leica Q First Impressions Review preview (559 comments in total)
In reply to:

Slipstack: Review quote:
"The Q is much heavier though and has a far superior build quality to the Fujifilm."

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/leica-q-typ116//images/allroundview.jpg

So why is it that that red dot with the Leica logo is not aligned correctly, but twisted 2-3 degrees clockwise, enough to make it seriously annoying to look at? Is this just me, or have nobody else noticed?

First thing I noticed, too. It's a preproduction model, I suppose, but it is sloppy.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 15:27 UTC
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1223 comments in total)
In reply to:

AlpCns2: Amazing camera, which (amazing) optics to match. Bravo, Samsung!

Alessandro, IQ is indeed paramount. Samples pictures can be found at http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsung-nx1/15

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 07:15 UTC

At first I thought: lots of canned, pre-chewed half-answers. Then, after reading DPR's epilogue, the impression was much better, also because much of the "good stuff" was probably off-record.

What amazed me, and still amazes me, is Nikon's insistence that the 1-series covers the need for those that want small, fast, and capable mirrorless systems. Nikon: It hasn't, and it doesn't.

And I am saying that as a great fan of your products, Nikon. That you're obviously listening now is good. You've got to listen better still.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 10:45 UTC as 79th comment
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1223 comments in total)

Amazing camera, which (amazing) optics to match. Bravo, Samsung!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 09:53 UTC as 115th comment | 3 replies
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1223 comments in total)
In reply to:

oselimg: So, Dpreview doesn't rate cameras on the basis of image quality since NX1 is awarded gold. Or Do you have "different" criteria for each brand? Perhaps Samsung now is a huge company to ignore.

Can you please explain what (scientific or not) method you applied in order to arrive at your (rather odd) conclusion that DPR doesn't rate cameras on the basis of image quality.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 09:51 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (814 comments in total)
In reply to:

phoenix15: This camera deserves gold award. I can't understand DPR judgment.

I completely understand DPR judgment, because it is very carefully reasoned and very well weighted against the competition, which is equally very good. Which is exactly why it is difficult.

The "problem" is that here are no really bad camera systems anymore. They are all good, very good even. All offer performance and features we could only dream of roughly half a decade ago. And then picking "the best" out of a bunch of excellent options becomes (has to become) more of a personal choice -as correctly argued by DPR, "very specific requirements"- than a clear winner on specs and/or performance alone.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2015 at 01:08 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (192 comments in total)

Interesting series, excellent pictures too in a rather difficult environment, as most factories are. Always fascinating to see how much precision, care and craftsmanship goes into precision mechanics and optics such as this.

Bravo DPR, Bravo Sigma!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 03:51 UTC as 89th comment
On CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview article (197 comments in total)

A very pleasant and informative read - in short, an excellent interview. Yamaki-san clearly has the vision of a true leader, with feeling for the market and customer-focus. The man simply sees it sharp: very sharp. A breath of fresh air, such a outspoken and honest CEO. Companies like that have my respect and sympathy, and get my business.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 09:22 UTC as 43rd comment

Sympathy, and great respect for the considerable technical capabilities of Fuji. A properly customer-focused company too. Remember, these are the only guys that were good enough to design and fabricate cameras and lenses for, for example, a highly respected medium format brand such as Hasselblad. Not Nikon, not Canon - and I am saying that as a user of both systems.

These are the guys that design and supply world-class optics for all kinds of applications. Many companies do, of course, but few are so well attuned to their customer base these days. Good products is important, but the latter is a very good thing. It forces others (I'm looking at you, Nikon) to listen better.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 1, 2015 at 02:58 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

exapixel: I don't know why DPR has to constantly bash Sony. Not a single Sony product was mentioned in this story even though all the cameras were mirrorless. You are all paid net shills for the doomed calotype vendors.

At least it is (was) full frame mirrorless.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 25, 2015 at 05:36 UTC
On New samples from the Sigma 24mm F1.4 DG HSM Art lens article (230 comments in total)

It's (again) obvious that Sigma is on a roll. As expected, this is a very, very fine lens. Half the price of the competition, and better quality to boot. What's not to like?

It's a great time to be a photographer.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 02:49 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

Fuji is doing some very, very smart things. They understand that great and relatively compact lenses, of excellent mechanical and optical quality, make the system desirable, capable and professional. Together with some wonderfully small yet extremely capable fixed-lens rangefinder-ish offerings they have exactly what many experienced users need and want.

Brilliant yet simple strategy. Makes one wonder why not all camera makers think that way.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 11:00 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Sigma goes wide with 24mm F1.4 DG HSM Art lens article (184 comments in total)

Sigma is clearly on a roll. If recent releases are anything to go by, this will be one spectacular lens.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 08:43 UTC as 43rd comment

Beautiful design. Together with Oly's excellent glass, this should be one very capable camera.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 17:06 UTC as 20th comment
On Nikon D750 flare investigated: Why we're not worried article (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

Horshack: Very nice follow-up on the flare issue Rishi. Ever since you started contributing to the editorial content on the site the depth of technical information has increased markedly. I just wanted to say thanks and to let you know your contribution hasn't gone unnoticed.

I would like to second that. Excellent reporting and a pleasure to read.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2015 at 03:27 UTC
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1929 comments in total)

Rather hilarious, that the Canon 1D X fared the worst, after all the furor on the web about the D750. Actually, I use both Canon and Nikon systems, including the Canon 1D X as well as the D750, and never noticed any problems with flare.

It seems to me that the conclusion that "this issue won't really be an 'issue' in all but the rarest of circumstances" is certainly valid. As is the case with most hyperbole on the internet.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2015 at 13:39 UTC as 156th comment

Brilliant initiative by a brilliant photographer.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 06:52 UTC as 4th comment
On Fujifilm X100T Overview preview (650 comments in total)
In reply to:

JaimeA: Reading the specifications we found out that this camera has NO image stabilization. Totally nuts if you like closeups, interior and night shots.

So what's the point? It has a 150-year old proven device instead, called a "tripod socket". It is very possible to make excellent shots in low light due to the lack of any vibration.

And if need be, use a tripod. Jeez!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 14:07 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)
In reply to:

rondom: This camera is excellent looking until you start shooting with it, and then it looks like a dog with an erection. The built in cap makes it even worse.
One other point: I don't think anyone would be jumping up and down if they saw the lens performance before the built in digital lens correction kicks in.
(Having said that I can understand the enthusiasm over this)

Who cares what it looks like. The results is what really counts. I own and use cameras that are pig-ugly, heavy, old-fashioned and cumbersome. But they do take stellar pictures.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 12:16 UTC
Total: 199, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »