RedFox88

RedFox88

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 394, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Adobe leaks 'Lightroom Mobile' app article (212 comments in total)
In reply to:

Holger Drallmeyer: Am I missing something? LR runs on Surface tablets for a long while already. And what about $99 a year? Isn't that a huge rip off? I probably just don't get it.

Surface is a real computer. Apple mobile devices are very limited operating systems and CPUs.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2014 at 14:35 UTC
On Adobe leaks 'Lightroom Mobile' app article (212 comments in total)

So LR mobile will be much more expensive than LR for computer? $99 per year vs. $150 for as along as you want then $79/ for an upgrade version use as long as you want. Adobe thinks customers are chumps and will pay what they feel like charging.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2014 at 14:30 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

Ayoh: Cool, now why don't you now also add some scientific rigour to your test scene and ensure all camera sensors are exposed to the same amount of incident light, as currently they are not. Otherwise you should clearly state that your current test shots cannot be used to compare noise performance, as, by looking at the comments, that is what most readers are doing and making incorrect conclusions.

Agree with Richard. when I take photos I'm not out there to put an image sensor through a rigorous test I'm out there to capture the light I want to, how I want to. Measurebators!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:48 UTC
In reply to:

vFunct: How come there was no D4 review?

Because it's a top of the line dSLR if you want or need the best buy it. That's what professionals do. It's the gadget junkies/uber-enthusiasts that want to see numbers and graphs before buying something!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:47 UTC
In reply to:

Mazhe: Are you also racing a K-3 review?

Dude, the d4 and 6D came out long before the k3. Chill out.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:45 UTC

I knew there was no way the same quality image sensor was going into the df for half the price of the d4. d4 is a good stop better at high ISO than the df. The df is good but of course the d4 is better just like d700 vs. d3s.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:44 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Have Your Say: Best DSLR / SLT of 2013 article (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

Johnny Liu: I voted the K-3 because i felt it was the only no compromise enthusiast camera in the list. Everything else is crippled in some way....

"crippled", please grow up!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:27 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year: Canon Rebel SL1 / EOS 100D article (270 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: It stands out among entry level DSLRs, it's lighter, smaller -- some like it, some don't. But nobody really likes the outdated Canon sensor, which is a generation behind the Sony sensors used in many other cameras.

marike6: LOL! You know there are 100,000,000s of people if not a billion people on this planet that know of digital photos in no format other than JPG!

The world is now viewing photos on phones where images will be small images or greatly reduced in size. JPG is a great storage format and differences between it and TIFF will need to be hunted out and viewed at 100% computer screen view or more magnified. Great if non compressed huge file size files excite you. Let me know when they come out with a 36 MP TV screen that is 120 inches diagonal. When they do it'll be half priced in 3 years with more features.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2013 at 00:22 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Dude, I didn't say "all" people there. Gihadists in the middle east are brainwashed into thinking killing themself for Allah will grant them 77 virgins in heaven!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2013 at 04:09 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Glory? It's been decades, if not centuries, since war was seen as "glory" in at least the developed world. Only the people in the middle east and north korea see war as a glorious thing these days.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 18:14 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)

Time should rename them: their most graphically violent and disturbing images of the year.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:49 UTC as 22nd comment | 2 replies

Ridiculous. When I workout I don't want to wear something that will make my face sweat more. Samsung: this is an audio device (music and phone calls) so why do you need to wear glasses for it?? LOL! This is what a bluetooth ear piece is for your phone and today many people's music player is their phone!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:44 UTC as 1st comment

And what if this never happens? People get bored and leave and no photo is taken. Fail, sorry dumb teenager!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:41 UTC as 2nd comment
On Is Instagram getting into the printing game? post (5 comments in total)

instagram photos are web sized results which will look crappy printed bigger than 1.5x2.25.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:39 UTC as 2nd comment
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

brianj: Does a photo need to be about some sort of violence to draw people's attention?

Certainly not, it's the stupid editors that are in charge. If you want to see a wider variety of news, and more in depth, read and view NPR/PBS news. They get into more uplifting and positive news instead of just a 30 second "making a difference" on NBC news that is really just fluff.

Oh for the day when "local" news on TV shows only local news and not national or international news. Leave them for the national news right after your show!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 14:13 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)

This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 14:08 UTC as 28th comment | 6 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2381 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Nikon is still the class leader for noise control. However, they all look great.

what is "noise control"? RAW is without noise reduction/removal. If you bring a RAW file into Lightroom, the program will remove all noise in there for you. So when developing RAW files I never see noise.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 18:16 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2381 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: DPR, are you going to fix your tests (or is it widget?) anytime soon? Why at ISO12,800, daylight RAW A7 and A7r are showing f/5.6 1/6400s while D610 shows f/5.6 1/4000s?

nothing to "fix". DPR says they don't just use the exact same shot settings from camera to camera but settings to get a standard exposure amount.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 18:15 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (259 comments in total)

My take? It's the M2 styled like an SLR.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 17:33 UTC as 56th comment | 4 replies
On Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology article (313 comments in total)

What is the point of this camera? Dials for old people and looks like an old camera with a slim handgrip like a P&S. And just 16 MP? nikon must be banking that people think fewer pixels is better which isn't the case when the image sensor is as large as the 35mm sensor is. And no video? If they really wanted to make it vintage, they would have removed the rear LCD screen. This may appeal to some old people, and then they'll probably get tired of the cumbersome controls and go back to their d800 or d600/610.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 02:25 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
Total: 394, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »