RedFox88

RedFox88

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jul 29, 2007

Comments

Total: 387, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Dude, I didn't say "all" people there. Gihadists in the middle east are brainwashed into thinking killing themself for Allah will grant them 77 virgins in heaven!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2013 at 04:09 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Glory? It's been decades, if not centuries, since war was seen as "glory" in at least the developed world. Only the people in the middle east and north korea see war as a glorious thing these days.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 18:14 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)

Time should rename them: their most graphically violent and disturbing images of the year.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:49 UTC as 22nd comment | 2 replies

Ridiculous. When I workout I don't want to wear something that will make my face sweat more. Samsung: this is an audio device (music and phone calls) so why do you need to wear glasses for it?? LOL! This is what a bluetooth ear piece is for your phone and today many people's music player is their phone!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:44 UTC as 1st comment

And what if this never happens? People get bored and leave and no photo is taken. Fail, sorry dumb teenager!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:41 UTC as 2nd comment
On Is Instagram getting into the printing game? post (5 comments in total)

instagram photos are web sized results which will look crappy printed bigger than 1.5x2.25.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 15:39 UTC as 2nd comment
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

brianj: Does a photo need to be about some sort of violence to draw people's attention?

Certainly not, it's the stupid editors that are in charge. If you want to see a wider variety of news, and more in depth, read and view NPR/PBS news. They get into more uplifting and positive news instead of just a 30 second "making a difference" on NBC news that is really just fluff.

Oh for the day when "local" news on TV shows only local news and not national or international news. Leave them for the national news right after your show!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 14:13 UTC
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)

This is deplorable. Time should be ashamed of itself. 95% of these photos are of death, destruction, and war. Year ago these images were not as accessible, now they are on the TV news and internet news website daily. No wonder the world is in such negative shape: images people see directly affect their mental mental condition and so much negativity severely damages and affects viewers brains, seriously. Negativity and graphically violent images are toxic.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 14:08 UTC as 28th comment | 6 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2381 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Nikon is still the class leader for noise control. However, they all look great.

what is "noise control"? RAW is without noise reduction/removal. If you bring a RAW file into Lightroom, the program will remove all noise in there for you. So when developing RAW files I never see noise.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 18:16 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2381 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: DPR, are you going to fix your tests (or is it widget?) anytime soon? Why at ISO12,800, daylight RAW A7 and A7r are showing f/5.6 1/6400s while D610 shows f/5.6 1/4000s?

nothing to "fix". DPR says they don't just use the exact same shot settings from camera to camera but settings to get a standard exposure amount.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 18:15 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (259 comments in total)

My take? It's the M2 styled like an SLR.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 17:33 UTC as 56th comment | 4 replies
On Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology article (313 comments in total)

What is the point of this camera? Dials for old people and looks like an old camera with a slim handgrip like a P&S. And just 16 MP? nikon must be banking that people think fewer pixels is better which isn't the case when the image sensor is as large as the 35mm sensor is. And no video? If they really wanted to make it vintage, they would have removed the rear LCD screen. This may appeal to some old people, and then they'll probably get tired of the cumbersome controls and go back to their d800 or d600/610.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 02:25 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

DotCom Editor: Either lead, follow, or get out of the way. This guy appears to be leading. Canon, not so much.

leading... to where? Off a cliff?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 00:42 UTC
In reply to:

samhain: Good interview, I like that guy!

But... I wish you would've asked him why Sony has completely abandoned the OVF.

because the OVF is yesterday's technology. It's too old for him! LOL!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 00:40 UTC

'Every six months I want to do something new'

That's the exact reason why I avoid sony products like the plague. They don't concentrate on their products long enough for them to be trusted by buyers. I want to know I'll be able to use my lenses on new cameras while sony clearly now wants to make new things, who cares about the old, right? Geez.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 00:39 UTC as 67th comment | 4 replies
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1513 comments in total)
In reply to:

kadardr: Leaked specs suggest it might be specialized for low light-high iso. An improved D4 sensor? WOW

I don't think a camera like this needs to do 10 fps like the d4. That won't be designed into this camera's image sensor. An image sensor is designed for specific purposes and throughputting a lot of data won't be this camera's goal.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 22:34 UTC

Small camera and big lenses don't make any sense since removing the mirror is claimed to be to made the camera smaller. Big lenses make the camera big to use.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 00:57 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Dazzer8888: serious serious cameras...put any lens on it you like with an adapter, if you don't mind manual focus, which many don't.

I won't be selling my A99 and 24-70 Zeiss as that's a different beast, but will be getting an A7R for more experimental stuff like free lensing and tilt shift.

And I say many, many more won't be bothered with manual focus lenses. Camera users have voted with their wallets buying autofocus since it came out to the point where extremely small number of manual focus lenses are made anymore. And those are generally made by companies who haven't/can't do the R&D to reverse engineer autofocus, e.g. Samayung.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 00:56 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: Given Nikon's extremely poor track record with its "waterproof" Coolpix AW cameras (AW100, AW110), there may be some hesitation towards this new offering.

Given the fact that the Nikon 1-J3 sells for $250 why are they bringing out more new models? I thought Nikon announced they were to seriously rethink their Nikon 1 line due to poor sales most of which the decline in their sales was due to decline in Nikon 1 sales.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 01:21 UTC
In reply to:

Francis Carver: Must be one of those quite rare silver colored UW cameras and lenses. Once this gets dropped to a sandy bottom -- good luck finding it down there. But the orange colored rubberized skin looks great.

Why should a "rugged" shockproof (drop proof to 2m), waterproof camera NEED a "protective" skin? Please answer me that Nikon!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 01:19 UTC
Total: 387, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »