tkpenalty

people need to understand that cameras like the D700,D3,D3s and this are drugs. The main appeal is the monstrous, light-sucking sensor. Nothing else gives this kind of performance for a relatively accessible price.

Just wait for the D800S if you guys want it at a more sane price.

thats the same as saying that you could afford more than 50 canon A1500 powershots. Nikon doesn't really overprice considering the D700 exists with a similar sensor to the D3s (which you conveniently ignored).

You're comparing a bodies made of normal materials versus higher end qc + much more expensive materials.

flood much?

I hope they implement wifi on the NX20. That would have so many practical implications that would make the camera so much more useful than just a piece of equipment by itself.

SBs come nowhere close to these studio flashes...

Like the NX200, when will we see the NEX7 review?

they have a full frame 14mm f2.8 fisheye

If you read the article, they made a mention to those lenses.

That is not the case with the pentax, sony alpha, and Nikon mount lenses; those ones have auto aperture, with the option of manual aperture.

You guys should probably have a check of samyang's 35 1.4; the premium lens killer :)

Is it just me or are panasonic carrying the m43 platform themselves these days?

Nice, this basically makes it their first EVIL camera.

That noise pattern is very different to the some of the samples that we've seen on the forums. this looks like it was shot with a preproduction firmware? RAWs please :)

Why isn't there a report from the samsung stand?

This would be awfully unbalanced given how light a S2 body is...

A S2 for street photography? You guys must be nuts; this thing's only for studio work.

Although everything isn't about noise performance, I find it somewhat astounding that the RAW noise level of this camera is outright the worst even at base sensitivities even when compared to old CSCs like the NX100. And the resizing theory does not really hold that well as programs don't know what to bin as noise.

Everything else about the camera is good however, but I'd love to see a better sensor inside it; possibly a camera thats more focused on image quality than features which alter, but not really improve the shooting experience.

Landscape photographers will be very happy with this though.

photographers are full of pride/ego usually; they don't like it when something else can do more than what they have.

I don't know how people can go 'this isn't for people who want to create art' here. Being able to have whatever you want in/focus/out of focus surely would let you do something like multiple shallow depth of fields within a single image; is this not creative/arty?

We haven't been able to do such 'focus bracketing' within one shot before.

and you forgot about the samsung NX which cost under $500. And still outperform it.

one of the best uses of HDR....