ManuelVilardeMacedo: It is certainly a great camera, of course, but I wish I could unsee the picture of the silver version. I know looks are not that important, but that thing is ugly and the lens makes it look ludicrous.
I think it looks nice... :(
Robbie Corrigan: Looks like K-3 has just put Pentax on the top step of the APS-C podium. Time to retire my faithful K-5.
The K-5 is already on the top step :P
cam shooter: It is refreshing to see Pentax finally entered year 2013. A little late to the game, but they might now be able to competed with the d7100.
Also its amazing to see your disregard for facts. Pentax is one of the other brands apart from nikon/canon that supports USB tethering.
So in what way is the D7100 a 2013 camera?
The sensor, body, performance, isn't '2013'. Everything about it is off-the-shelf.
Cameron R Hood: Pentax is doomed....
raimaster: at least 10 highlights: 1. 24 MP2. 8,3 fps - 23 raw buffer (first firmware)3. 25 crosstype sensor - 3 luminance flux4. On/Off AA Filter5. Robust WR - metal + magnesium alloy body6. AF -3EV7. 86K pixel metering 8. 200.000 shutter circle9. USB 3.010. Body IS.....also dual slot card, 14 bit raw video, focus peaking etc ...
not to mention that the CDAF on pentax is fast.
"It only replaces several primes".
igor_s: How often would you shoot at f1.8@18mm on APS-C or f2.8@24mm on FF? Strongest vignetting and aberrations, and what subject? On the longer end you can have prime 30mm f1.4 for half the price. Superior optical quality? Will see.
Bend over, mr conventionalist.
Pik2004: Does anyone know when Samsung will come up with new sensor? the current sensors is over 4 yrs old. How will they keep up with competition?their lens line up looks pretty good, but not camera.
The NX300's sensor is new, the NX210/20's were also new, and the NX200's sensor is not even two years old yet.
I believe you meant: "Does anyone know when Canon will come up with a new sensor?" All they do with that 18mpx sensor is worsen its performance every iteration by increasing the noise reduction.
Holy crap. I want.
No RAW support. That's kinda pointless...
thx1138: As far as Samsung phones go, it is well known Samsung violates the open source licenses and releases broken, or incomplete source code that nees massive work by devs to compile using other sources to get a functional OS. Those that own a Galaxy SIII will now all about Samsung's lack of support for the dev community which has seen huge number abandon the platform for Sony. I wonder how complete this source code is for the cameras.
Pretty sure the development community of Samsung's/HTCs is far larger than Sony's. Also afaik modding a sony has a risk of bricking.
Why dont they just make a mirroless D3x00 with on sensor phase like the V2 and the same aesthetic?
Much less R&D, much easier engineering, and each camera would be cheaper. The V2 isn't even small anymore....
Old Ed: Has anyone else noticed that there is STILL no "portrait prime" for DX, THIRTEEN YEARS into the format??? Please forgive me if I don't get excited that one has been announced for the "m43 wannabe" format.
The 50mm f1.8G is a great, cheap, portrait prime.
People comparing this to a D800 are just silly.
justin23: I'd consider the CC model except for the fact that in many countries outside the USA the price is double to triple. The introductory special rate for existing license holder sin oz is a whopping $29 a month! Many australians bought the software from the USA because it was half price. This is adobe way of saying screw you we can stop you and make you pay double or triple. The excuse of higher costs doesn't really apply anymore because its all online.
I hope the ACCC burns adobe for the price gouging they carry out over here. The price premium we pay is ridiculous, especially when we should be paying less, given our exchange rate.
Sigma needs to basically release a full set of lenses for the NEX line... just because Sony isn't.
AngryCorgi: It's available in pink. That pretty much says it all.
New sensor, new processor, a firmware that gives it loads of options.. wah?
Samuel Dilworth: Why does every new Samsung sport yet another design? The company is downright schizophrenic!
Sarcasm? I swear we Just had a post complaining how all the cameras look the same.
Peiasdf: Samsung treats its cameras like its cellphone. The same crap wrapped in new exterior with more gimmicks. How about slowing down the release schedule and actually provide useful improvements. Also, provide firmware updates.
Err I swear the NEX series was the same camera over and over.