Lives in Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
Joined on Oct 18, 2004


Total: 280, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Mike FL: So far, FUJI only has ONE weather sealed IS lens.

T1 is not a bad body, but too bad.

As references:

- SONY has 4 OIS+sealed E- lens

- 8 sealed MFT lens for OLY

- 18 sealed lens for Pentax

It is system camera.

Clearly you're just a gearhead. Sorry, but, *pentax* lenses? You'd be very lucky to find one that is well-centered and the variation is HIGH. Not to mention only few Pentax lenses actually have good optics/resolution. I used to be a Pentax user and I still keep some lenses (limiteds and MF). The new DA zooms are mostly meh. Fuji may not have too many OIS and WR lenses, but most of the lenses in the line up are excellent. Totally different class. So yeah you're good in pure statistics. I give you that ;)

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 23:27 UTC
In reply to:

Peter CS: Never mind a weather-sealed x-mount, fixed focal length lens. Biggest weather threat is changing lenses in a harsh environment. For this reason, I want the Fuji- X mount 10-24mm and all their other zooms to be weather-sealed for my landscape and hiking trips! I have a hard enough time just keeping my sensor clean - while changing lenses - in good weather...

WR lenses allow you to take photo under the less-than-ideal weather or harsh environment not to keep changing lenses. Get the 16-55 if you want WR zoom.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 23:22 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robert Kempen: Now let me see, who shall I believe

The endless BS from the Leica haters, or the reviews coming in from real professional photographers who actually use cameras to make a living

Oh yes and then there is the price of course - haters want the very best but cannot afford it - it is always the same is it not - the same crappy comments from the same idiots who cannot afford Leica

Just get a life - you don't like it or cannot afford it, move on and go talk your BS around your barbecue and leave the forum to people who appreciate the efforts from the camera manufacturers

There's a fanboy and there's a professional....fanboy! LOL

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 09:20 UTC
In reply to:

cgarrard: Buying it. Good price, good features, seems like a good optic with two ED elements. A nice focal for casual photography. Done, this is what Fujifilm needs more of.

Same here. Looks like a good compact optic.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 07:25 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1509 comments in total)
In reply to:

semorg: Hahaha LOL! Who is this camera for? Hulk?

I'm sure even Hulk prefers something less fugly! Green version maybe? But no worries, it's Leica. They will put some engraving BS and different color, call it limited and sell it at twice the price ;)

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 03:03 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1509 comments in total)

I just read another hands on review on the rumor site, it says Leica put everything people like about mirrorless into the SL. Really?? I love my mirrorless small and easy to carry!

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 01:46 UTC as 324th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

RichRMA: Voigtlander laughs at Sigma!!

Why? what's so good about voigtlander? 0.95...on m4/3? laughable.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2015 at 01:30 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: The Canon EOS M series was NOT designed to compete in the MILC market.

It's sole function is to provide Canon brand loyalists with a MILC camera to prevent them from buying a competitive brand. And when you look at it that way, it has been a raging success.

If you want a better MILC camera and a better value, then Sony, Fuji, Olympus, Samsung, and Panasonic all have one for you. It just won't have a Canon name on it.

Correct. I use Canon DSLRs (4 FF bodies) but when it comes to MILC, I use Fuji, and not one of this piece of cr@p called M series from Canon.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2015 at 15:12 UTC

Should have been called a Tamtax or Penron lens.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2015 at 02:53 UTC as 61st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

p5freak: High end glass, but focus by hand, ridiculous. Hello Zeiss, the manual focus age is over, since decades. Canon and Nikon bodys and not build for manual focus. What is a razor sharp lens good for, when you cant focus it properly ?
A modern lens has to support on sensor phase detection autofocus. Thats the most accurate way to focus, to get the sharpest possible pictures.

@vscd - Leica uses RF for focusing which is very precise. It works well even in low light. OTOH, DSLR uses AF-assist which is not 100% accurate. In that case, I prefer AF for the sake of comfort and speed...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 23:31 UTC
In reply to:

aramgrg: Zeiss is like Victoria's Secret girls. You want-but not affordable!

not really Otus not-affordable

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 23:27 UTC
On article Readers' Showcase: Tony Eckersley (73 comments in total)

Nice photos from a talented photographer, thanks to DPR for posting this.

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2015 at 11:42 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article The travel photography of HDR guru Trey Ratcliff (235 comments in total)

personally I prefer no HDR at all. LOL

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 12:36 UTC as 103rd comment
On article Opinion - Erez Marom: Whatever it Doesn't Take (191 comments in total)

I'm very sure some of those places are probably 30 min drive from his home, hence less strenuous :D

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 01:21 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

FuhTeng: I'm looking forward to the super-tele comparison tests that are inevitably on the way. The 200-500 f5.6 is appealing.

I'm hoping Ren Kockwell will cover it.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 15:53 UTC
In reply to:

disraeli demon: Still no affordable, compact 24mm f2 lens for APS-C - I guess if you're into primes, Nikon (and Canon) expect you to upgrade to full frame.

get a Fuji and call it a day?

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 15:52 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 90mm F2 LM WR real-world samples (182 comments in total)
In reply to:

mgm2: These images are indeed nice, but quite frankly I am not sure they are better that what I get with my Pentax K3 and the Tamron 90mm 2.8 Macro.

different kind of drawing, CA, micro contrast, etc.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2015 at 17:05 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF 90mm F2 LM WR real-world samples (182 comments in total)

The images were converted using ACR, has it been C1 Pro 8.3, Iridient, or Photo ninja, the image quality would have been even better.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2015 at 16:26 UTC as 34th comment

I had to pick the 3rd sample when buying ZE 25/2. Event the 3rd one is far from perfect (still slightly decentered, 5% of the image mushy on the left side) - but I had to accept because Zeiss said it's expected given it's a retrofocus lens... So having so many sub contractors is not really a good thing - maybe...

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 13:52 UTC as 52nd comment

Nice shot! Despite what the typical DPR gearheads said...

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2015 at 20:42 UTC as 38th comment
Total: 280, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »