salamander1

salamander1

Joined on Jun 23, 2012

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

"New super fast, stabilized lenses: 35/1.2 , 50/.95 , 85/.95 , 135/1.4"

wow! :))) look at that 50/95. i can almost feel it.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 03:17 UTC as 588th comment

the cicalatron
the gladiator
hercules
dixie lee

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 05:51 UTC as 66th comment
In reply to:

MarshallG: Now THAT'S a Hasselblad! They did Victor proud.

victorovitch? nabokov? putin?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2014 at 05:26 UTC
In reply to:

MarshallG: Now THAT'S a Hasselblad! They did Victor proud.

who's victor? :)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2014 at 04:47 UTC
In reply to:

salamander1: while some of these pictures are very nice, motherly and estrogenic - we, men, have a hard time deciphering female art and would rather shoot hurricanes and tornadoes in the wild - i personally would not even think of showing my children to the world as fashion models purposefully posing half naked with their pants sagging gangsta style. i think this is very exploitative in a number of ways, and it is simply not decent in my opinion. i would not take such a photo of a child. it's a bad taste indeed. you've got to draw the line somewhere. children are still part of their parent's physical territory and their pictures belong in the family too. respect them. portraits and pictures of kids with, say, dogs and geese are okay, kids as naked fashion models are not okay. my opinion.

nudism is not the point. everyone in finland can go to the sauna at the same time, for example - men, women and children, the whole family., but your pictures don't end up posted on the internet. i only really have a problem with one of her pictures., the one with the little ducks. i think it is very exploitative the way it is staged and presented. make no mistake about it, these are not impromptu pictures, but carefully composed, directed and acted compositions. she knew very well what she was doing. child in sagging pants with ducks. she went too far. my opinion.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 04:01 UTC
In reply to:

salamander1: while some of these pictures are very nice, motherly and estrogenic - we, men, have a hard time deciphering female art and would rather shoot hurricanes and tornadoes in the wild - i personally would not even think of showing my children to the world as fashion models purposefully posing half naked with their pants sagging gangsta style. i think this is very exploitative in a number of ways, and it is simply not decent in my opinion. i would not take such a photo of a child. it's a bad taste indeed. you've got to draw the line somewhere. children are still part of their parent's physical territory and their pictures belong in the family too. respect them. portraits and pictures of kids with, say, dogs and geese are okay, kids as naked fashion models are not okay. my opinion.

:)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 04:04 UTC

while some of these pictures are very nice, motherly and estrogenic - we, men, have a hard time deciphering female art and would rather shoot hurricanes and tornadoes in the wild - i personally would not even think of showing my children to the world as fashion models purposefully posing half naked with their pants sagging gangsta style. i think this is very exploitative in a number of ways, and it is simply not decent in my opinion. i would not take such a photo of a child. it's a bad taste indeed. you've got to draw the line somewhere. children are still part of their parent's physical territory and their pictures belong in the family too. respect them. portraits and pictures of kids with, say, dogs and geese are okay, kids as naked fashion models are not okay. my opinion.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 03:56 UTC as 142nd comment | 4 replies
On Just Posted: Sony Alpha SLT-A99 review article (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Not a bad camera by any mean but SONY clearly crippled certain functions to not step on SONY's professional cameras and upcoming SONY 1D X/D4 camera's toe.

Also a few hundred too expensive consider the recycled EVF from A77 and cheaper "mirror box"

what's this upcoming sony 1dx/d4 camera's foe? is this reliable information? thank you.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2012 at 20:43 UTC
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8