jkokich

jkokich

Joined on Jan 25, 2012

Comments

Total: 117, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Wow! I want one!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 17:51 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

allegretto: Do any of you ever consider just not commenting if it's not for you?

Hey, you won't find on on my shelf either, but every time I come here guys (and gals) are just ripping on stuff they don't have and likely have never even seen.

I mean it's sometimes like watching kids rip wings off grasshoppers.

I know... just don't read comments... right. Well OK but some of you appear quite... angry about life or something and come here to work off some heat

Lighten up... it's just a camera for God's sake

I like you! Awesome post, and well said!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 17:51 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X Review preview (394 comments in total)

Lotta Cons for a Silver award.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 18:21 UTC as 94th comment | 5 replies
On Drift Stealth 2 action camera is maker's smallest yet article (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

miiicho: 3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?
I don't buy it unless it's metric!

You know, it doesn't matter, because we did it 45 years ago, with slide rules.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 04:54 UTC
On Drift Stealth 2 action camera is maker's smallest yet article (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

miiicho: 3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?
I don't buy it unless it's metric!

So, let me rephrase: There are two kinds of countries. Those that use the metric system, and those that put men on the moon.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 15:51 UTC
On Drift Stealth 2 action camera is maker's smallest yet article (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

miiicho: 3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?
I don't buy it unless it's metric!

You'd think they could put a man up there with all that.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 14:50 UTC
On Drift Stealth 2 action camera is maker's smallest yet article (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

miiicho: 3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?
I don't buy it unless it's metric!

D1NO and Giklab: Do you mean Russia and France don't use the metric system, or that they put men on the moon?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 17:32 UTC
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (378 comments in total)

Those pictures just don't look good.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 05:23 UTC as 104th comment
On Drift Stealth 2 action camera is maker's smallest yet article (39 comments in total)
In reply to:

miiicho: 3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?
I don't buy it unless it's metric!

(Humor alert) There are two types of countries: Those that use the metric system, and those that went to the Moon.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2014 at 15:47 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1869 comments in total)
In reply to:

jkokich: Those shots don't really look very impressive.

Thanks, Paul!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 15:48 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1869 comments in total)

Those shots don't really look very impressive.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 03:27 UTC as 41st comment | 4 replies
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (328 comments in total)

I know the article is an opinion piece. I don't usually criticize DP articles, but this one is downright silly. I'm going to grab my Minolta Beercan and my A57 and take some great pictures.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 14:35 UTC as 91st comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1869 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: It is the time for Panasonic starts to look into APS-C and/or FF sensor while M43 sensor goes to its P&S, and 1" sensor goes to its Smart phone.

IBIS, in body image stabilization, right? My Sony A57, an APS-C ILC, has that. Am I missing something?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 15:21 UTC
In reply to:

jkokich: I shoot a web series on my iPad, and this will make life sooooo much easier! I'm always running out of space, and this is much cheaper than buying a new iPad.

I produce a Doctor Who parody web series you can see on my website whatdoctortheseries.weebly.com and I shoot it using the camera in my iPad. The video is HD and looks great, but having only 16gb of memory is limiting, so this WD drive will give me a lot more storage.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 8, 2014 at 15:21 UTC

I shoot a web series on my iPad, and this will make life sooooo much easier! I'm always running out of space, and this is much cheaper than buying a new iPad.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2014 at 17:01 UTC as 20th comment | 2 replies
On Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review preview (182 comments in total)
In reply to:

RecklessAbandonArteests: It will be interesting to see how JK Imaging does with this.

In 2014 the Kodak name only has relevance with non-digital baby boomers (non-digital baby boomers includes camera users who grew up with Kodak film cameras in the 1950s forward).

Users born in the 1980s forward are using smartphones to take pics. Just as cell phones killed the wristwatch market, cell cameras are killing off interest in dedicated digital cameras. Moreover, for most users cell cameras take acceptable pics and video for viewing on the medium of choice, TFT monitors.

Kodak cameras are going to be designed, manufactured, and marketed to the baby boomer market. The cameras will always be simple to operate. I suspect JK Imaging is paying a paltry sum to use the Kodak name on its products, and the Company will take baby steps selling Kodak-branded cameras.

That's not to say this is a foolish endeavor. The baby boomer market is HUGE. And the point & shoot crowd has lots of cash to spend on cameras like this.

Let me check my wristwatch... Yup, there it is, right on my wrist.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2014 at 04:40 UTC
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (310 comments in total)

It looks cool and takes good pictures.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 16:37 UTC as 28th comment | 2 replies
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (362 comments in total)

Nice retro styling! Very cool!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 18:25 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

jkokich: I love film. I love Kodak. Anyone who says film can be the same cost as digital is simply wrong. You have to buy film, which cannot be reused. You have to process film. You cannot watch film that you have just shot; it has to be processed. Sure, you can watch a video backup, but then why use film in the first place?

Please quote my entire sentence.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2014 at 22:22 UTC
In reply to:

jkokich: I love film. I love Kodak. Anyone who says film can be the same cost as digital is simply wrong. You have to buy film, which cannot be reused. You have to process film. You cannot watch film that you have just shot; it has to be processed. Sure, you can watch a video backup, but then why use film in the first place?

You guys are missing my point. I didn't say anything about archiving footage. My post was about cost, the cost of using film to shoot something. Film is more expensive to use. I can use memory cards over and over. I can view the actual stuff I shot, immediately. I don't have to buy film. Film is more expensive than digital. Anyone who thinks differently has never had to budget a shoot.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2014 at 16:47 UTC
Total: 117, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »