Morpho Hunter

Morpho Hunter

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on Jan 30, 2010


Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Don't believe it ..suspect "something big" ........will be a "tie-up" with the fourthirds format .... (hope so).


Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2014 at 00:08 UTC as 32nd comment
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2300 comments in total)

Cool looking camera ...this is the iPhone/ipad (design wise) of the camera world and the body-only price is well worth the money. Unfortunately the lenses (seemingly) are no better than anyone else's ..and will cost at least 3- 5x as much...and then there's that ugly clip-on viewfinder ... unbelievably there isn't an aluminium-coloured version.

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 17:47 UTC as 181st comment
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2300 comments in total)

Gorgeous camera (and not THAT pricey for a Leica) - unfortunately the sample images are nothing special as far as image quality is concerned. I'm amazed that Leica did not go for the 4/3 format/mount .... the market for their lenses would have been enormous ...because I suspect that most of we Olympus guys would have save up to buy at least one of their lenses!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2014 at 18:19 UTC as 360th comment | 1 reply

Scratches head ...who needs 4k video?

Scratches head in 25 years' time ...who needs 4k video?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 23:35 UTC as 20th comment | 7 replies
On Gear breakdown: Behind the scenes with Chase Jarvis article (35 comments in total)

Never heard of the guy ...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2014 at 23:38 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On 900MP portraits show human face in extreme detail article (288 comments in total)

Well this guy's work is nothing special .... if you can afford the gear, then you can produce similar results other words, no talent is required. However, I do wonder whether the quality of a poster-sized print from my (16MP) Olympus E-M5 would look any worse than a similarly-sized image from this photographer's set-up.... probably not.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2014 at 23:20 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
On A look inside Sigma's lens factory article (89 comments in total)

Well it's a great video .... but I simply do not understand why ...given all that expensive modern technology ...most (but not all) Sigma lenses are ....

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 20:41 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
On Fujfilm interview: 'The only way is to keep innovating' article (228 comments in total)

"The only way is to keep innovating". Which reads "the only way is to keep copying Olympus".

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 20:36 UTC as 44th comment | 8 replies
On Reminder: Vote now for your product of 2013 article (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jorginho: With 6619 votes and Oly at 33,1% and the nr2 at 20,0% we already know EM1 is the winner...

Similar claims were made last when the E-M5 won. I suspected Oly was onto a winner when I first handled that camera at Focusing on Imaging Show (Birmingham, UK). The Olympus E-M5 stand was right next to the Nikon D800 stand .. and when the Olympus floor show started ...several of the guys running the Nikon stand came over to have a look at/handle the camera. One wonders just what will Olympus market that will take the winner's title for a third year running ....(well, who would bet against them doing it?)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2014 at 23:36 UTC
On Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' article (373 comments in total)

Well, well, well......... 2014 sees the launch of three excellent cameras ..the Sony A7 and A7r and the Fuji XT1 ..... so surely it's inconceivable that Olympus will win product of the year for the third time................(you wanna bet .......hehehe)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 01:00 UTC as 59th comment | 2 replies
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1606 comments in total)

A good camera with a well-merited high score. Given the latter, I expect the A7R will get a gold award (sensor resolution is stunning when looking a DPReview's test scene). However, I just do not understand why Sony released it and the A7R with so few (and expensive) dedicated lenses, and not one of them being a (cheapo) macro.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 00:58 UTC as 337th comment | 2 replies
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (490 comments in total)

Now try using those same lenses on a MFT camera. I suspect image quality, especially edge sharpness, would be considerably better.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 23:15 UTC as 147th comment | 2 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

JJ Rodin: I find this NEW studio scene COMPLETELY USELESS for looking at high resolution comparison with good quality DSLRs !! Useless!!

DPR needs to fix this with some HIGHER detailed (ie -hard to resolve) money pieces, lithos or something - their OLD Studio scene was FAR SUPERIOR !!

Did I say USELESS ? Oh BTW, I meant USELESS !!

I agree. Why oh why did DPR change the test scene - the new one is terrible! Perhaps someone should start a petition to reinstate the old one.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2014 at 18:07 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)

I can't think why I would ever attempt to successfully process a photo using ANY tablet "computer" just cannot be done.


Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 23:08 UTC as 33rd comment | 9 replies
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

Looks great ...I guess word must have got around that Olympus's "retro" cameras are selling (why do other manufacturers copy, or should I say, try to copy what they do?) It will be interesting to see if Canon also copies I quite like the idea of a digital A1 or F1 (remember those, guys?)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2013 at 17:18 UTC as 183rd comment | 4 replies

Sod Adobe ...the freebie does almost everything that this overpriced product does ...correction does EVERYTHING for most users ....provided you download all the freebie plugins.

Go try it it folks ...and be amazed how it brings back the detail in those seemingly super-overblown, unrecoverable, highlights.... from jpegs

Well ok don't do RAW ...but it's only a matter of time before someone posts a raw plugin

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 22:45 UTC as 741st comment
On More pictures leak of purported Olympus PEN 'E-P5' article (237 comments in total)

Full E-P5 specifications now available here:

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 09:32 UTC as 16th comment
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue article (240 comments in total)

OM-D EM-5 user looks smugly on - Olympus doesn't "do" dust ...... never has done

Direct link | Posted on Feb 23, 2013 at 17:07 UTC as 46th comment | 1 reply
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1511 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: IF you going by IQ, AF speed, low-light AF and AF tracking it's no contest between the D800 and EM-5. Anyone who tells you different hasn't used the D800.

Agree on all points. However the D800 appears to be unforgiving with regards to the blur seen at 100% in many handheld shots - so to negate this, I would assume that for many users, their images have to be viewed/resized down to (say) the size of an OM-D image. I've never owned/used the D800, but comparing DPReview studio shots for both of these cameras, there ain't THAT much difference in images quality, considering the differences in sensor size and price. Given this, the physical size of the OM-D alone makes it a winner.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 UTC

Same here. Over the years, I've owned several Olympus FourThirds and MicroFourThirds cameras and have never found a dust spot on any of my photos. The dust removal mechanism is truely amazing.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2012 at 14:09 UTC as 65th comment | 4 replies
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »