Hinder

Hinder

Joined on Oct 17, 2011

Comments

Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

I love my M.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 4, 2014 at 19:31 UTC as 2nd comment
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review preview (724 comments in total)
In reply to:

JJLMD: Canon and Nikon are tomorrow's IBM and Kodak unless they undergo an extreme makeover. I rekindled this hobby in earnest about 2 years ago after decades of disinterest. When I started researching gear, I started researching only Canon and Nikon but it didn't take me very long to realize that Sony, Fujifilm and Olympus were making the most exciting products. Look, there are still people who still see Cadillac as THE prestige brand so it'll take awhile but there's no doubt in my mind that Canon and Nikon are on the same path as IBM and Kodak. These companies were once dominant and during their reign, it was unimaginable they would fall all the way to the bottom.

Hmmmm, google "Sony bankruptcy"

Direct link | Posted on Jun 24, 2014 at 23:49 UTC
In reply to:

beavertown: The worst investment ever made by Tameron. Who owns EOS-M?

Even the population of the unwanted Nikon 1 system is much higher than the EOS-M.

Me too.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 05:55 UTC

I love my M, this lens will make it more useful when out and about and when I need to, I can use my L lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 05:29 UTC as 1st comment
On Horny Cactus in the Thorny Cactus challenge (2 comments in total)

:-) Challenge is for "T" horniness! Sorry couldn't resist.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2014 at 02:23 UTC as 2nd comment
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (640 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel Stehura: 12.8 megapixel........... What year is this? Slackers at Canon pumping out another under pixeled camera. Great Internet camera just don't blow up past 8x10. It's as big as a f 150 Ford truck, rather gross in Size and design. For a small Camera the Sony RX 100 II Has better image quality, Sony uses Carl Zeiss Lenses the best. Canon lenses are #3 after Nikon. I would have to have 3 beers to drink this big clunky boxy camera pretty. The Pixel count is from the year 2000!!!! What in the next 10 years they will be up to 20.2 Megapixel...... Good luck Canon for milking the pixel count for your profit taking. Nikon D800 is progressive and my 18x22 inch Epson 3880 shots are Razor sharp like a Ansel Adams print, Well Almost lol

A lot of people don't want a tiny camera, you can use a phone if you want tiny, therefore phone cameras are better than the sony. Also, phone companies honor their warranties unlike sony did on mine.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 01:05 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (640 comments in total)

I don't care for small cameras like the sosony. I don't care what features it has. I have an iPhone if I need small. Who carries a camera in their pocket anyway? My phone is smaller than the rx100 so that makes it better.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 00:50 UTC as 19th comment
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2978 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarcMedios: This camera is a real game changer. My main objection (shared by many pros I know) was the lack of viewfinder. First, who wants to look like a soccer mom focusing and second, impossible to really frame and focus in most conditions. The pop up viewfinder destroys all of those objections in a second. Also, it doesn't eat valuable real estate on the top of the camera. Add that to absolutely no shutter lag, a quality lens and a 20mp sensor and you have the beginning of the end of low-end pro-wannabe cameras. Thank god it costs $800 meaning a lot of soccer moms and mammarazzis won't buy it. Next step, a 5:1 zoom, perhaps 24-135? That would be a killer combo

Hmmmm, nice try. Not a good out.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 03:32 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2978 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarcMedios: This camera is a real game changer. My main objection (shared by many pros I know) was the lack of viewfinder. First, who wants to look like a soccer mom focusing and second, impossible to really frame and focus in most conditions. The pop up viewfinder destroys all of those objections in a second. Also, it doesn't eat valuable real estate on the top of the camera. Add that to absolutely no shutter lag, a quality lens and a 20mp sensor and you have the beginning of the end of low-end pro-wannabe cameras. Thank god it costs $800 meaning a lot of soccer moms and mammarazzis won't buy it. Next step, a 5:1 zoom, perhaps 24-135? That would be a killer combo

"Thank god it costs $800 meaning a lot of soccer moms and mammarazzis won't buy it."

Huh? Why would you care who buys it?

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 02:13 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2978 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jennyhappy2: Sure seems to be ALOT of interest in the RX100 III, over 1,000 comments on the First Impressions Review...nearly twice as many as the G1X II which was posted a week ago. Hasn't even been released yet and looks like Sony has yet another hit on their hands.

And just how does that affect you? Billions and billions of McDonalds hamburgers have been served so that makes the sony look like a loser now.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2014 at 03:40 UTC
On Massive 3,000 square foot pinhole photo on display article (34 comments in total)

What is is? Maybe they should hire someone to take a better picture.

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 21:50 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On Lytro announces Illum light field camera article (346 comments in total)

https://pictures.lytro.com/lytro/albums/149429/embed?token=6cb04136-c43a-11e3-9416-22000a8b14ce

Okay, that was fun, clicking and holding on photo while moving cursor around in circles makes him look like he's driving over bumps. But what else do you do with it? It looks nice though.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 15:27 UTC as 88th comment | 1 reply

How do you tell if someone is lgbt by looking at them or are we supposed to ask?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 29, 2014 at 15:53 UTC as 4th comment
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary article (534 comments in total)

Why does Europe get the grip and not U.S.?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 03:39 UTC as 18th comment
On John Stanmeyer wins World Press Photo of the Year article (83 comments in total)

I don't believe holding your phone up two feet higher across open waters will do anything to boost a signal. Looks staged. How do we know these guys weren't just too cheap to go inside the concert and are rocking' out outside the stadium?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 04:35 UTC as 12th comment

I would like it for the EOS M when I don't want to carry a lot, this and the 22mm for low light will be fine for what I do.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2014 at 16:54 UTC as 13th comment
On In photos: The beauty of bees article (49 comments in total)

Great photos.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2013 at 05:38 UTC as 12th comment
On Dandelion & bokeh in the !!!BOKEH PHOTOGRAPHY!!! challenge (3 comments in total)

Nice, this was my choice.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 25, 2013 at 02:18 UTC as 3rd comment
On 2moon in the Beautiful Wallpapers for Mobiles challenge (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Images by Kipper: Pixel peeking and it still looks like a great shot. Well done ~ Kipper.

Thank you

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 22:34 UTC

Hmmm, too late, I already declared it on October 12th.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 19, 2013 at 15:49 UTC as 3rd comment
Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »