ecka84

aperture ~ amount of light
exposure = amount of light * exposure time = aperture * shutter speed
ISO ~ pixel sensitivity (size and tech) * signal amplifier (processing)
image brightness = exposure...

Next stop - EF-S 55-250/4-5.6 STM ?

I'm afraid that 650D vs 700D has less differences than 650D vs T4i :))

Yes! New lens caps! Finally! :)

Yes, we do need FF. Smaller sensors cannot deliver the same amount of "DOF and everything else" ... that's physics. If you are happy with less "DOF and everything else", then you may find your...

Because $500 price is not realistic for such camera.

Full Frame Mirrorless
50+ megapixels with optional pixel-binning
(e.g. 4µm ~ 54mp 9000x6000,
2x2 binning mRAW 4500x3000 for flawless, sharp details at low ISOs,
3x3 binning sRAW 3000x2000 for low...

I really doubt that you need more than 1:2 magnification for copy work. IMHO, for most outdoor macro stuff longer lens is better, like 100mm (at least). I think that short macro lenses are perfect...

Pray that the next one will be mirrorless with a lens mount ;)

In a similar way APS-C camera can support FF lenses, by using only 40% of the glass.

I did. I just never understood why this series had no RAW by default, while all the competition did.

I wonder if this GPS would account for an image of something that have been shot from like 2 miles distance at 1200mm eqv. That could be a different country :))

"One change compared to previous EOSs is that the mode dial rotates freely though 360 degrees, with no end-stops."
Alleluia! :))

OMG! SX50HS got RAW! Finally! :D I've been waiting for it since SX10IS.

Looks like it is happening on every photograph, exactly in the same spot, but it is visible only when that part of the image is bright. That must be some kind of dirt on the sensor.

I wonder how would this new 40/2.8 pancake lens work with extension tubes. For now, it is on the top of my WTB list :).