zigi_S

zigi_S

Lives in Slovenia Slovenia
Joined on Mar 1, 2009

Comments

Total: 166, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2371 comments in total)
In reply to:

jpr2: I really do MISS two things in the new DPR's comparometer:

- nowhere in the scene there is an object of a relatively large, uniform surface, like it was a flat blue face of the watch, and yet with some very firmly outlined and crisp ciphers of the OLD comparometer - the bottle at the bottom can't replace that blue watch entirely, alas; the new scene is just a wee bit too busy with lots of pretty "talkative" object;

- and the ability to compare OLDER cameras with the new ones (this would be easier to rectify, but are there any such plans?);

I like the low light scene. It gives those dx0 champions a run for its money.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 15, 2013 at 14:38 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2371 comments in total)

Winner of low light noise is Canon. Second Sony DSCR1X1. Seems as DXO is a balloon of hot air. How can anyone prefer the blue tint over solid blacks. And where is Canon 6d? It ought to be even a little better.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 15, 2013 at 14:30 UTC as 190th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Ken Johnes: 500 $ for a silly firmware upgrade? and the target audiance for this camera have been waiting eagerly for this AF upgrade .
wow, greed and trying to milk it´s customers with incremental upgrade are gonna hurt the big dogs here, both of em, look at what nikon is trying to do.

i think nikon and canon are competing with each other on how to sell less for more, while other companies are making innovative products at a fair price , no wonder these greedy top dogs have to make up for their loss with such silly act..

Some just like to be "scre*ed" the nikon way. Cough D610.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 12:44 UTC
In reply to:

zigi_S: For anyone making money on video, this sum is chump change. For all the others, you probably didn't fork out 5500$ for the body alone. So you should complain about Nikon Df, that lacks any video for a cool 3000$.

And this camera is more than you bought.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 12:40 UTC
On Tamron to develop 150-600mm F5-6.3 ultra-telephoto zoom article (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

LukeLT63: I do not understand why Tamron does not produce more new lens for Pentax. I wish I knew ....I'm sorry for my friends that use Pentax!

Look at the market share of pentax.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 12:38 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Review preview (601 comments in total)
In reply to:

MGJA: This is silver, but Canon 70D is gold. Heh.

Really, I am ever more convinced that dpr just hands those out in order to maximize page reloads as irate fangurls battle it out in the comments. Fine, whatever puts food on their tables is a-ok with me.

"No kidding, these days Canon's APS-C cameras can't even keep up with the image quality of little MFT sensors."

No matter what a score says. My canon apsc camera takes better photos than a 43 and m43 ever did. IQ is not only about sensor noise. Bigger format captures also more detail and colour information.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 12:31 UTC
In reply to:

scrup: Too many people getting use to free windows updates.

There is a difference between fixing your product and upgrade.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 20:46 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

Saffron_Blaze: Of course it should be less expensive than the D800!! The D800 is pro-level in all regards not just the sensor.

The Df is a cooler looking D600 around the D4 sensor, so a moderate price increase might have been accepted (despite the missing features like video and flash) but not to this extreme. In fact in the UK you can get a D800 for less than a DF!!! That is silly.

Well in the UK you have the bankers tax to pay. And you love it!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 18:45 UTC

For anyone making money on video, this sum is chump change. For all the others, you probably didn't fork out 5500$ for the body alone. So you should complain about Nikon Df, that lacks any video for a cool 3000$.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 18:28 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Ken Johnes: 500 $ for a silly firmware upgrade? and the target audiance for this camera have been waiting eagerly for this AF upgrade .
wow, greed and trying to milk it´s customers with incremental upgrade are gonna hurt the big dogs here, both of em, look at what nikon is trying to do.

i think nikon and canon are competing with each other on how to sell less for more, while other companies are making innovative products at a fair price , no wonder these greedy top dogs have to make up for their loss with such silly act..

The upgrade is much cheaper than getting a new camera. Canon has to be congratulated on this one. Not criticized.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 12:50 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

vFunct: Only talented people can use this camera.

Untalented people have to use Sony or Canon or Olympus.

Also, it is a mark of amateurs to use cute baby mirror less cameras.

Aww how cute - a newb photographer with a mirror less camera!

Maybe one day the mirror less camera photographer will grow up and use a Reflex system like the big boys do.

Yay! We're rooting for you, cute little mirror less camera kiddos!

Have you forgoten the worst of the mirorless crowd. The Nikon 1 system?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 20:55 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathondetroit: The only thing that sucks about this generation of cameras is that we're paying more money for less features. There are benefits of usability, and some construction/durability benefits, but in general stripping cameras down to their basics should yield some cheaper bodies as well.

Why not replace a mode dial with a shutter speed dial on the D3200? Why not replace a high res screen with a low res one? (Think M9–If the screen isn't the primary finder, then its performance isn't a necessity). There could be a pretty "hip" plastic rendition of these cameras...

Once "simple" and "retro" break through the "premium" class of cameras, there will be a huge reaction; Throw some real dials on entry levels cameras and give purist consumers a chance to reap the benefits on technological advancement–not pay a premium to get a luxury replication of bricks of the past.

Modern cameras walk all over old ones. Deal with it.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 14:39 UTC
On Canon EOS 70D Review preview (690 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jimmy jang Boo: If the $1200 70D is a cutting edge stalwart, it's a seriously dull cutting edge.

Wouldn't be better to call it what it really is? According to dpr, image quality isn't really any better than the NEX-5N, which also meters and focuses better than the 70D. And in terms of low light and high ISO performance, the 70D lags a good distance behind the 5N. Gold must be pretty cheap to be so freely given away.

What good does the sony sensor bring if it's equiped with subpar optics and slow AF?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 00:21 UTC

Sigma is better than nikon telephotos(zooms) and on par with canons. For a lot less.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 01:38 UTC as 11th comment

Wouldn't be easier to have lights sown onto the cloth?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 18:07 UTC as 40th comment
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

Panasonicus: Fans of global Nikon expert, Ken "Kenneth" Rockwell, will have observed Ken's conversion this year to Canon. I was a faithful Nikon user since the late 60's and converted to Canon about 7 years ago after a few failures of non-made in Japan Nikon equipment. However, due to the need to downsize I am now quite happy over at Panasonic and a G3 owner. Nikon need to up their game and return manufacturing to Japan, get rid of the cheap gold paint on their lenses that symbolises bling and not quality.

Fanboy.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 17:48 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sean65: No way. A Canon with focusing issues.

Nikon FF side AF problems.

Posted on Oct 14, 2013 at 11:11 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)
In reply to:

69chevy: This just shows what most DSLR owners already know.

Sensor based AF is not very good regardless of what you call it.

The focus errors are less noticable on M4/3 because of the larger DOF, but they are there.

It's just the opposite. On sensor AF is better than of sensor.

Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:23 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)
In reply to:

ProfHankD: I really don't much care about PDAF. In fact, I usually prefer manual focus with peaking. However, I'm impressed to see that Canon's dual pixel structure doesn't seem to have sacrificed IQ for PDAF. According to both DxOMark and the DPReview sample images, this sensor is a significant improvement over the sensor in, for example, the 100D or 700D. It still has a half stop less dynamic range, but it's the first 1.6X crop sensor Canon has made that doesn't get trashed by the 1.5X crop one in the Sony NEX-5.

DPReview says the 70D competes with Canon's FF -- I cannot agree. The Sony NEX-7 outperforms the 6D at low ISO and looses to it at high ISO, but 6D IQ is always better than the 70D in color depth, dynamic range, and low light. Still, the 70D proves that Canon's dual pixels are a viable approach, competitive in APS-C IQ while incorporating a useful new capability. Now if only Canon would give us direct access to the 40M half-pixels.... ;-)

Dual pixel could widen DR. One sensel shot @ iso100 the other @ iso1600. Dual pixel tech opens a huge area of new posibilities. That's why this tech is revolutionary.

Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:01 UTC
On Zeiss announces 'no compromise' Otus 55mm F1.4 article (488 comments in total)
In reply to:

rb59020: Here we go again, another Zeiss bashing session. Most of the readers here would have no problem blowing $800-$1000 on an unlocked iPhone5s that will be obsolete in six months.

What did you people do before the F3AF came out in '83? OMG! It's not autofocus! How am I supposed to take a photo without autofocus!?!

Whaaaaa!

Most iphone users spend 199$ at front and other expenses are ignored.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2013 at 11:54 UTC
Total: 166, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »