ranger604

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Apr 11, 2012

Comments

Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
On article Fujifilm X30 (beta) real-world samples (95 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: The images are soft, and noisy, and lacking dynamic range ... and still they are pretty good for such a tiny sensor.

(don't feed the trolls)

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2014 at 20:18 UTC
On a photo in the Fujifilm X30 (beta) Samples Gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

beta. understood. but.. few really stand out as 'sharp'. or is that just me?

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2014 at 20:15 UTC as 1st comment
On photo BETASAMPLE_ISO800_DSCF1283 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

beta. understood. but.. few really stand out as 'sharp'. or is that just me?

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2014 at 20:15 UTC as 1st comment
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)

No IBIS or OIS. Does this make purists happy?

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 14:52 UTC as 644th comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review (351 comments in total)
In reply to:

turvyT: I have no particular interest either in this OM10 nor in the Pentax k3. But I'm curious about new cameras and like to be informed. K3 was announced almost half a year ago. OM10, less than two months. Still waiting for K3 review --or for Godot in this fully interesting exercise in surrealism by Dpreview. Personally I don't believe anymore in any of the excuses Dpreview has been producing about the lack of interest in the Pentax K3 by readers. I'm now convinced that under those foggy words of lame excuse there is only a lack of respect for people interested in new cameras and camera's technology.

Everybody still waiting for the Pentax K-3 review should demand for a refund from DPR. Y'know.. for all the money that they've paid in subscriptions to the site. To fund the writers/reviews. It's outrageous!..

What's that?.. it's free?..

Oh.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 20:49 UTC
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5