vv50

it seems phones are the flavor-of-the-month bane of so-called gearhead purists. there was a time when all they complained about was camera manufacturers putting video features into their DSLRs....

unless you're forgetting, sony made some of the first digital cameras

it's a self-fulfilling prophecy. as consumers become more aware that phone cameras are capable enough for their needs, they will look for it in their next device.

that's like saying that one of the features you would consider in selecting a camera is to be able to shoot pictures.

come on. in that same thread you called APS-C sensors undersized and insisted that "FF sensors get better IQ under any kind of light". it's obvious that your opinion keeps changing, you can't...

that equally applies to you

the more you write, the more we become aware of your ignorance

RX100 sensor = 2.4 microns
4/3 sensor = 3.7 (newer) to 4.2 microns (older)

P: "Bigger pixels, better images"
P: "and the 1inch sensor...you should check the IQ it is better compared to older micro...

how many mobile devices had a major OS update? it's called inference.

your co-worker is not a pro photographer, and there are already more people who carry their smartphones than DSLRs and carrying these to sporting events. The question is: Are there any baseball...

your co-worker is not a pro photographer, and there are already more people who carry their smartphones than DSLRs and bringing these to sporting events. The question is: Are there any baseball...

whatever happened to "the bigger the better"? you couldn't help contradict yourself again

wow, he hasn't made any sense for a long time, but this rambling just goes on

the words of wisdom from someone who said he can recognize moire but a PRINTER CAN'T !!!!

looks like someone doesn't even know who he's talking to

you assume that your friends' children are going to install 220" tvs in their homes, which is where 8k resolution matters at normal viewing distances. if the tv is only 80", they'll have to sit...

there's no evidence that the designer of the 808 targetted DSLRs. the pureview technology in the 808 was designed to be able to perform lossless zoom for pictures and video like an entry-level P&S...

let's get away from this "no one needs more than xx MP" as there will always be someone who will find a practical benefit to having more, and they'll get a MF if they care. as far as the 80th...

it's very easy to put a large sensor in a large body just as it would be easy to design a bus to carry 40 people. but it remains that a convertible is a competent transportation for certain...

there are some who really cannot see the irony of their argument, they will continue to talk about full frame sensors and its merits on an article devoted to mobile device technology. and they are...