GodSpeaks

GodSpeaks

Lives in Thailand Bangkok, Thailand
Works as a Retired
Joined on Sep 6, 2002
About me:

Livin' la Vida Loca

Comments

Total: 349, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »

It seems to me that if extreme ruggedness was your goal, you would use SSDs, not HDs with moving parts.

However, making the rugged case available separately is a good idea. I wonder if it is compatable with 'other' media.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 07:10 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic Lumix CM1 coming to the US post (81 comments in total)
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: Sony 6.44" Xperia Z Ultra with QX1 APS-C E mount smartphone camera :
https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8615/15947075285_4f58229370_b.jpg

20mp original image :
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7533/16112217541_5c7fcd7d4a_o.jpg

I'll take the Panasonic CM1 anyday over that Sony frankencamera, er, phone, er, whatever.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 05:28 UTC
On Panasonic releases trio of compact superzooms article (102 comments in total)

Interesting. The high end ZS50 looks good, the other two not so much. Still way better than what Canon announced though.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 05:09 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

Amnon G: More of the same, with the smell of segmentation all over (hey, it's what customers buy so I can't fault them). It's time for new technologies to show up in the rugged world. folded lenses and tiny crappy sensors can only go so far.
NFC/Wifi/etc. is nice, but having a rugged camera is still a big compromise in picture quality which is a shame.

Check out the Nikon 1 AW1. Great image quality, beats the other 'rugged' camera by a landslide.

I am looking forward to an updated AW2 (not to mention some additional AW lenses) soon.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:52 UTC

And STILL no raw.

Ok, never mind. The Nikon 1 AW1 reigns supreme in this category. And then some. Great image quality, by the way, far far better than any other 'rugged' camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:49 UTC as 6th comment

I think Ricoh needs to find a new marketing team.

A high magnification and a large diameter telephoto zoom? Really?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:45 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies

$300. Seriously?

I can do most of the above using media players and a WiFi connection to the internet. For less than $100 too.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:33 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On Canon announces five PowerShot compacts article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: I'd like to thank Canon for this nostalgic journey back to 2008.

Many of us old people hate change, so Canon is the brand for us!

Have to totally disagree with you on the MFT MP count.

With the 1" sensor now at 20MP, MFT needs to do 20, or better yet 24MP, if they hope to stay relevent. It would also give them better competitiveness against APS sensors too.

Please note: I an NOT advocating high MP sensors in EVERY MFT camera. But they do need at least one high MP count model.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:18 UTC
On Canon announces five PowerShot compacts article (150 comments in total)

Yawn.

I thought I had read that this class of cameras was dead. The smartphone has replaced it.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 04:12 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On BPG image format aims to replace JPEGs article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: It seems we get a 'new format to replace jpg' at regular intervals, but none ever do.

Until it appears in a camera I own, I don't care.

Hugo: Why would I have to buy a new camera to stay compatable? Compatable with what?

Worst case scenario is I would need a new photo editor that supports the new format.

As it uses H265 compression, I would worry about patents and the royalties that involves. That issue alone may pose an insurmountable obstacle.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 12:35 UTC
On BPG image format aims to replace JPEGs article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eric Glam: I support BPG. Let's go for it!!!

We need a way out of the 8bit world, and if this takes off, I'm all for it.
We had JPEG-XR by Microsoft, JPEG2000, and we have WEBP by Google. All of which didn't get wide-spread acceptance. I hope this one will, as long as it's truly royalty-free. The decoding speed is crucial to its success, but the author didn't quite talk about it.

Ever heard of RAW?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 12:26 UTC
On BPG image format aims to replace JPEGs article (205 comments in total)

It seems we get a 'new format to replace jpg' at regular intervals, but none ever do.

Until it appears in a camera I own, I don't care.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 06:01 UTC as 42nd comment | 6 replies
On ACDSee Ultimate 8 introduces layer-based editing article (66 comments in total)
In reply to:

marc petzold: I used to use ACDsee since 2.x as my default picture viewer on windows, because it was blazing fast, compared to all the others....but unfortunately, i think even the "Ultimate" Edition of ACDsee 8 can't really compete with the now "old" 2012 CS6 Release of Photoshop. I tested a couple days the trial from CC, but it's soo slow & bloated, on my older selfmade Quadcore PC, and i really don't need the new features from CC, also i don't want to have a abo.

I only think - compared to Lightroom 5.x, ACDsee 8 Ultimate is simply way too expensive - 149 $. For instance, there is Corel's Aftershot Pro 2.x, which is way fast, and even the completely FREE RawTherapee, as a good RAW Converter tool...and dozens of others.

Personally, I hate LR because it forces you to 'catalog' everything. I have zero interest in cataloging anything. I just want to point my raw converter at a folder containing my raw images, and telling it to have at it. And that's why I use Capture One Pro. It allows me to work the way I want to work.

As for ACDSee, the few times I tried the recent releases over the past few years, I found it to be deadly slow, especially if you had raw files. So basically, I gave up on it. I do however, still use ACDSee 3 as my (fast) image viewer.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 04:37 UTC
On WaterWeight rethinks the sandbag approach to stability article (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

Savas Kyprianides: This is perfect for drinking brew on the way to the shoot and then relieving yourelf onto the product to give it ballast. When done, pour out the biodegradable contents.

So, one time use, then?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 11:45 UTC
On Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue article (379 comments in total)

Interesting. I had something similar happen to the sensor on my Kodak SLR/n. On the images, it looked similar to the photo on the left above.
Fortumately it wasn't a problem until the camera was 5 years old, by which time it was also showing other signs of creeping failuritis.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 11:27 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On All-in-one: Ona Capri bag review article (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cane: That's a woman's purse.

Photokhan: I have not seen any photos taken with thousand dollar purses.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 04:12 UTC
On All-in-one: Ona Capri bag review article (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

JohnEwing: Daft styling (or total lack of it), daft price, totally impractical. Should sell very well.

Samuel: No shoulder strap, so you have to put it down when using the camera. No cover flap over the top opening, which could allow rain inside, and an exposed metal zip to scratch your camera/lenses.

Yes indeed, poor design and not very practical for a CAMERA bag. Probably great as a womans purse.

Oh, I forgot, somewhat over priced too. Again, probably a great fashion accessory, but not a camera bag.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 03:56 UTC
On All-in-one: Ona Capri bag review article (168 comments in total)

Looks like my girlfriend's purse.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 03:48 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Aaron801: It doesn't really seem all that expensive, though compared with the much better image quality and more usable, less distorted format of the Rockinon fisheye, it is... With that lens, I could de-fish and have a very nice super-wide, non-distortaed image. This one seems like more of a one trick pony and one without particularly great IQ at that. Not on my want list...

Agreed. I have the Samyang 7.5mm MFT version and it is an amazingly useful lens.

A circular fisheye is definately a one trick pony.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2014 at 03:37 UTC
On Not dead yet: Sony announces three A-mount lenses article (120 comments in total)

The Alpha mount is dead, it just is unaware of it's fate, so it has not lain down yet. The writing has been on the wall for some time.

At this point, anything new in Alpha is a token effort. Sony is all in on mirrorless, so it is only a matter of time before the official announcement. It is only a matter of time.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 27, 2014 at 04:04 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies
Total: 349, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »