GodSpeaks

GodSpeaks

Lives in Thailand Bangkok, Thailand
Works as a Retired
Joined on Sep 6, 2002
About me:

Livin' la Vida Loca

Comments

Total: 353, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2364 comments in total)
In reply to:

geenoz: You whinny poo haters, stopit already , if you cant see why we need 50mp dont worry yourselves into a heart attack, mirrorles this and mirrorless that wide DR, please get a life. Some cannot afford this camera so they crap all over it like a new born baby,stopit. Haters. Family portrait shooters will love this camera, when I look at the Images from medium format digital, I can only dream of one day owning one of those bad boys, Canon comes along to help us out a little and all of a sudden its not enough or its too much. Give the camera a chance to prove ifself. Nikon did an excellent job with the 800 model cams, at one point comparing it to medium format. So its not just the megapix race, its the Canon haters, so get the hell outta here and head on back to whatever ya shoot with and leave the photographers that make a living with their cameras alone,jeez

I think it is a very interesting camera. I will also be very curious to see what Sony and Nikon do in the way of a response.

Personally, I have zero need for 50MP, and if I was going to go 50MP, I would much prefer to go the Pentax 645 route.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 05:10 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2364 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miles Lye: If Sony can get IBIS and exceptional high iso performance in the A7RII, then what's the point in upgrading or considering this camera or a Nikon alternative? Why pay more for less? The A7 cameras aren't perfect at all but Sony is making amazing progression in a short amount of time and they listen. After using an A7 and seeing the progression with the A7s and A7II, I don't doubt Sony will make this camera look dated when the A7RII is announced.

If you are talking about FE mount lenses, then I agree with you. But talk about A mount and now you have a whole new ballgame.

PLUS, the Zeiss lenses for Sony mounts (A/E/FE) are all AUTOFOCUS.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 05:04 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2364 comments in total)
In reply to:

munro harrap: Part III .
Note too that the video is crippled. No 4K. only 30fps at HD1080p. There isn't even a headphone socket. You can get all that for far less than £3.2K on a Sony.

And this has me asking why there is no declaration here of buffer depths.
Why is there no declaration here of shutter-lag?

Both of which cripple earlier models and the Sony A7R. I am waiting until CAnon reduce shutter lag to 0.42 m/secs or less.

IN fact I am wondering why this is not a mirrorless machine sold with an AF adaptor for all EF and EF-S lenses? Really.

Is that in 6 years and 2 "upgradeson" ? Well as a Nikon user annoyed that the D810 was not produced first, I'm sure Canon users will learn here from how we were treated, at OUR expense to below par specification- as you can now buy a second-hand D800 that cost £2.4K in spring 2012 for £1K with a years warranty, so expect your depreciation on the non R model to be the same....

High MP cameras are not good for video as too many compromises are required.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 19:04 UTC
On Olympus 8mm F1.8 'pro' fisheye in development article (29 comments in total)
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: I have to wonder what this lens brings to the table over the excellent Samyang 7.5mm?

Other than speed and likely high price.

At 8mm you do not need AF.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 05:45 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2364 comments in total)

One issue is that diffraction limits will set in around f5.6. That, and what lenses can resolve properly on a 50MP sensor?

As someone who owns both 24MP and 36MP FF cameras, I can state that 36MP is already too much, for me.

One thing I did learn was that technique is VERY important at 36MP. I can only guess how very very important it will be at 50MP. This is a tripod, not hand held camera.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 05:25 UTC as 602nd comment | 6 replies
On Olympus 8mm F1.8 'pro' fisheye in development article (29 comments in total)

I have to wonder what this lens brings to the table over the excellent Samyang 7.5mm?

Other than speed and likely high price.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 03:47 UTC as 2nd comment | 5 replies
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 updates rugged series article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: Still- nobody is doing a camera like this with raw files ;)

Nikon 1AW1 shoots raw, goes to 49 feet, has a 1" sensor and has interchangeable lenses.

Perfect for the Bahamas.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 02:43 UTC
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 updates rugged series article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cane: Why can't this genre make bigger sensor versions of these cameras?

Nikon 1 AW1

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 02:39 UTC
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 updates rugged series article (18 comments in total)

So, still no raw and now no 4K too.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 02:39 UTC as 4th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Review preview (446 comments in total)
In reply to:

NAwlins Contrarian: The table on the first page comparing the GM1, GM5, and RX100 Mk. III is misleading in an important respect. For some purposes (weight, zoom range) the Panasonic M4/3s are listed with their kit lens, but for other purposes (depth), they're listed without it. As your pictures on page 2 show, put on the kit lens and the package becomes more like 3 inches (75mm) deep. An RX100 Mk. III is pocketable in most reasonable pants pockets; with the Panasonics and their kit lens, forget it unless you have cargo pockets.

Also, since we routinely list lenses with focal lengths as "35mm equivalent", can we please routinely do the same thing with apertures? For some purposes it's convenient to see that the 12-32mm kit lens is an f/7-11 equivalent and the RX100 Mk. III's lens is an f/4.9-7.6 equivalent. IOW, (1) the Sony can achieve shallower depth of field, and (2) in low light, its much brighter lens will tend to more than compensate for its somewhat smaller sensor.

Listing focal lengths as 35mm equivalent is good, but definately NOT for aperture.

The whole aperture equivalence is total BS and serves only to confuse. Not everyone is even interested in DoF across different sensor sizes, and f2.8 is f2.8 regardess of sensor size when it comes to EXPOSURE.

Personally I am sick and tired of the whole aperture equivalence argument as it is so often used by those with an axe to grind to put down cameras with less than FF sensors.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2015 at 06:35 UTC
On Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom article (229 comments in total)

Capture One Pro is far superior to lightroom. Plus you are not forced to 'catalog' everything.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 02:48 UTC as 21st comment | 12 replies

What I would like to have seen would be a comparative review of the Tamron against the Olympus and Panasonic equivalents.

To me, that would have been much more useful.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2015 at 03:12 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Marty4650: Superzoom lenses are notorious for their mediocre image quality, and this lens is no exception. Sure, they are convenient, because you "never have to change lenses." But if that was your goal, then why did you buy an interchangeable lens camera?

Two cheap kit lenses do the same job better, and cheaper. I just don't get the point of these lenses.

Anyone who has a lens changing phobia should just buy a Panasonic FZ1000 and call it a day.

I think the main reason for these kind of lenses is to be an all in one travel lens. ie: sheer convenience for the traveller.

That said, I think I agree when you say the FZ1000 would be a better choice.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2015 at 03:02 UTC
In reply to:

Astrotripper: Not surprised to see poor performance on wide end. But I am surprised how well it handles harsh backlight and flares. This is where my Olympus kits fall apart completely. And this Tamron seems to correct for chromatic aberrations pretty well, too. I'd say it looks decent for a super zoom, too bad about the wide end.

But at $600? I think I'd rather shell out another $200 and get Panasonic FZ1000.

LOL, but very good point.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2015 at 02:56 UTC

Who cares?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2015 at 03:14 UTC as 80th comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm announces new rugged and long zoom compacts article (29 comments in total)
In reply to:

wolfie: When will someone have the balls to put something bigger than the tiny 1/2.3 sensor in a rugged compact?
Another pathetic rugged clone ...

1" sensor in the Nikon 1 AW1

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2015 at 03:09 UTC

Yawn.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2015 at 03:27 UTC as 6th comment

"extremely useful for Macro Photography and Portrait Shooting "

Portrait shooting? Strange, but I have never had the desire to do 2x marco shots of the people of whom I take portraits.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2015 at 03:24 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
On Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path article (1454 comments in total)

I knew this thread would become flamebait when I read it. And sure enough, from browsing the posts, it has become a magnet for the trolls, fanboys and equivalence experts.

Just buy what fits your budget and suits your needs. Pretty much every camera made today by the main players exceeds the capabilities of the user, regardless of sensor size.

If you have specific needs, then factor that into your decision making process when making your purchasing decision.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 02:31 UTC as 165th comment | 5 replies
On Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path article (1454 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foxshade: Quoting from your article:
The result is that, if you start buying full frame lenses while you're still shooting APS-C, you're either buying a lens that's not very useful now, or you're buying a lens that won't be as useful once you've made the switch.

Now, as a Nikon APS-C user, can you name ONE APSC zoom lens with fix aperture 2.8 besides that 17-55mm. So, don't give this kind of BS of APS-C users buying full frame lens that's NOT VERY USEFUL on APS-C.

FF lens on APS-C would give me a 1.5x zoom factor. So, if I were to use my 70-200 FULL FRAME lens, I'd be like using a 105-300 mm. It's a useful kick if I were going for airshow or birding.

Foxshade: Maybe you should go with a Nikon 1 system and then you get a 2.7x 'kick' from your FF lenses. Extremely useful, I would think, for airshows or birding.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2015 at 07:02 UTC
Total: 353, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »