PIX 2015
Leandros S

Leandros S

Joined on Jan 22, 2013

Comments

Total: 507, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

GRUBERND: i would really like to know what WX is doing differently (again) that requires a firmware upgrade in a camera.

So hang on, Fuji's cameras don't work with BSD/Solaris/Linux et al.?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2015 at 04:19 UTC

Solution in search of a problem?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2015 at 21:04 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

ttran88: Nikon D5500 won for consumer category so how did Canon sweep DSLR categories?

This article isn't about Sony.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 18, 2015 at 00:39 UTC
In reply to:

Leandros S: I don't understand how it's a 2015-2016 award when only the first half of 2015 could be accounted for.

At least nominally, this is not an industry association, but a press association. So if anything, they want you to buy magazines, not gear.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 18, 2015 at 00:07 UTC

I don't understand how it's a 2015-2016 award when only the first half of 2015 could be accounted for.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 17, 2015 at 23:51 UTC as 104th comment | 4 replies
On Corel releases ParticleShop brush plugin for Photoshop article (73 comments in total)

Is this the first time they've released a plug-in for an Adobe product?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 12, 2015 at 18:43 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
On Rough and ready: Olympus Tough TG-4 review article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cane: It's a shame this segment insists on such a small sensor. Such great potential, such bad image quality. Wash, rinse, repeat.

You either get the choice of a crap IQ p&s, a leaky Nikon, or a crazy priced bulky diving housing for a real camera. There's a giant hole in this market. Hope someone will wake up and fill it.

Which you evidently have not done, or else you'd know the story.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2015 at 15:34 UTC
On Rough and ready: Olympus Tough TG-4 review article (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cane: It's a shame this segment insists on such a small sensor. Such great potential, such bad image quality. Wash, rinse, repeat.

You either get the choice of a crap IQ p&s, a leaky Nikon, or a crazy priced bulky diving housing for a real camera. There's a giant hole in this market. Hope someone will wake up and fill it.

@HowaboutRAW: If you read the Imaging Resource reviews, you'll find that Nikon consistently overperformed in the leaky category.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2015 at 14:13 UTC
On Rough and ready: Olympus Tough TG-4 review article (240 comments in total)

For anybody else wondering: the cat photo is ISO 800, the building fronts are ISO 100 (in the RAW vs JPEG comparison).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2015 at 14:10 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply
On Opinion - Erez Marom: Whatever it Doesn't Take article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: Sounds like someone trying to discourage the competition.

Arrogant how?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2015 at 21:48 UTC
On Opinion - Erez Marom: Whatever it Doesn't Take article (190 comments in total)

Sounds like someone trying to discourage the competition.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2015 at 13:48 UTC as 69th comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography article (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: Fuji, I think more people would be interestd in a b&w version than this one!

What it is is way too much conjecture on your part. It also strikes me that you don't know anything about this process and are just blathering on to feel superior. Don't worry, I won't educate you.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 18:06 UTC
On Video: Summing up our Fujifilm X-T10 Review article (16 comments in total)

Will you also be serving drinks throughout the flight?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 17:59 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography article (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: Fuji, I think more people would be interestd in a b&w version than this one!

Except Fuji execs may not agree with you and price it differently, and there's nothing you can do about it.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 10:41 UTC
On Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography article (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: Fuji, I think more people would be interestd in a b&w version than this one!

That's only true if very few people buy it.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2015 at 21:24 UTC
On Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography article (203 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Davinator: Fuji, I think more people would be interestd in a b&w version than this one!

Not that those are mutually exclusive - you could have a B&W without UV/IR filters. And sell it for $800 because you're saving major manufacturing steps. But then people would use it wrong and complain...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 14:38 UTC
On Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography article (203 comments in total)

That price is just asking for DIY videos of how to remove the filter from the standard model.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 14:10 UTC as 36th comment
On Casio Japan introduces Exilim EX-ZR3000 and EX-ZR60 article (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

sapporodan: It was the DP review compact round up that made me buy my Casio FH100, a great camera, getting a bit old in the tooth now but I still like it.

Shame Casio have not expanded beyond small sensor compacts. They were there right from the start and I don't want to see the brand disappear.

Well, 1/1.7" is quite a bit bigger than 1/2.3". What we know about Casio though is that they generally specialise in making small things and are apparently happy being a niche player in the camera market, so...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 10:44 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: what is real world samples? if you don't compare with another lens?
I don't care about dpreviews real world examples if I don't have a reference

We pay in advertising and marketing data. Remember this site is owned by amazon. "If you're not the customer, you're the product." Enjoy!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2015 at 10:47 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: what is real world samples? if you don't compare with another lens?
I don't care about dpreviews real world examples if I don't have a reference

And I haven't cared much for their test scene since they removed the parrot feathers.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2015 at 00:53 UTC
Total: 507, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »