Davidgilmour

Apple adds stuff to the sd cards that slow them down on Fuji cameras.

No. It should be less than 2,5 seconds. Check your memorycard, do you use Apple systems at home?

So they replaced the orbs with the green smudge. Way to go Fuji.

The test is worthless because the background an WB are difference.

Well, I own both the X-E1 (with 35mm) and the X-100. I think the X-100 has better colours, but I like the sharpness of the 35mm, the 16MP, the shuttersound and the fact that this lens is better...

I can imagine that From what I've seen so far Of the X-100s. Not really worth the $600 price difference.

Agreed, from what I have seen the X-100s is missing that "special look" that the X-100 Classic has. Those colors can't be beaten imo.

There is nothing I see here that the X-100 Classic can't do....

Yes,  instantly! 35mm f 1.4 would be awesome!

Yeah, that would be awesome!

Yep, me would love them loooong time too if they could make a 1.5, 2.0 or 2.5 coverter, that would be awesome! How about it, Fuji?

Thanks, I knew it was just typical Fuji hype when they announced the X100s with the fastest bla bla bla. The old X-100 took a long time and many many firmware updates to get it right. Autofocus is...

Great picture! Do you think you would be able to get almost the same effect with just the X-100's internal flash?

But can it also take pictures?

I am selling snapshots of my bycicle for $5,75. You can buy as many as you like.

Could you test the AF in low light? Because my X-100 has a really fast AF in normal light too, no prolems whatsoever.

lol , I like the last sentence, especially in the light of the previous ones.

Are there any samples of nice portrait pictures taken with the RX1. The Zeiss lens , fulk frame sensor, fast lens should give us some nice portraits, shouldn't it?

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx1/20yrs, the JPEG of Sony (!) beats the Fuji X-100 JPEG. and raw too.

Ah, it's been postponed, it was feb 16. So we will see the first reports this weekend...