delastro

delastro

Joined on Jan 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 36, showing: 21 – 36
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Article:3683182476 (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

delastro: Here it is
http://masterfotos.mmxxl.com/street/streetphotography_strassenfotografie.pdf

it is public but there was a time with hosting problems. it is solved.

Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 16:51 UTC
On Article:3683182476 (4 comments in total)

Here it is
http://masterfotos.mmxxl.com/street/streetphotography_strassenfotografie.pdf

Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 07:14 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

jnk: The best endorsement any company can ask of their products?

A star athlete giving his own personal endorsement without being "pay to do so".

"A star athlete giving his own personal endorsement without being "pay to do so"."

You know it - directly and indirectly?

I know only that advertising and pr is all in sport. It is the way to wealth.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2012 at 12:25 UTC

I think this is PR. May be I will read dpr still more critically in future.

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2012 at 20:14 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

mandm: Cheaper way to get a 1200mm with AF for the few times needed is put the 800mm on a D4 with a 1.4x and you have a 1200mm f8.0 and still have Auto Focus.

Nikon V1 with 70-300, 300 x 2,7 = 810

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2012 at 07:51 UTC
On article Review: Nokia 808 PureView (349 comments in total)
In reply to:

delastro: I like that we can compare the Nokia 808 photo quality now with other cameras on dpreview. But I think you should give us the chance to compare the 8 MP way because 43 MP is not the way people use.

And to Nokia: how is it possible to make such an innovation with such an unflexible OS? Are those decisions the reason for the fall?

top!

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 05:44 UTC
On article Review: Nokia 808 PureView (349 comments in total)

I like that we can compare the Nokia 808 photo quality now with other cameras on dpreview. But I think you should give us the chance to compare the 8 MP way because 43 MP is not the way people use.

And to Nokia: how is it possible to make such an innovation with such an unflexible OS? Are those decisions the reason for the fall?

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 05:18 UTC as 116th comment | 3 replies
On article Just Posted: Nikon D3200 in-depth Review (358 comments in total)

I like the handling of the D3100 and not the handling of the D3200. The possibility to switch between single shot and quiet mode in the D3100 is great and in the D3200 ist bad.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 20:46 UTC as 45th comment
On article Just posted: Fujifilm X10 in-depth review (155 comments in total)

It is now a camera which can be used for years.

And as a little hint if you want to know what is in the horoscope of the fuji x10 you can read it here http://www.astromonat.de - translate it with google ...

Link | Posted on Jul 13, 2012 at 19:22 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Cailean Gallimore: I'm seeing the same thing on some images produced by my X100. It's not happening very often, and it's not as noticeable, but it's there. Easy to handle in pp. Maybe an update for the X100 is needed too...

Can we see such a photo?

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2012 at 20:48 UTC

Fuji says - after my experience with Fuji and their behaviour I think if Fuji says something to the white orbs it can only be bla bla bla...
I do not trust them any more.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2012 at 20:31 UTC as 102nd comment

Why buy this for more than 1000 euros when I get a pana g3 for 500 euros: what has this camera more for 500 euros more?

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2012 at 05:47 UTC as 45th comment | 7 replies

The price is high and it is a very dangerous system because until today Fuji did not show that they want to care for their products.

Today the firmware/software is one of the most essential parts of a camera.

But Fuji did not make much for the X100 and nothing for the X10.

So I think it is better to buy f.e. a Ricoh, Pentax or a Leica camera because these people help their customers.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 06:12 UTC as 137th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

delastro: F 3,5 and beautiful bokeh?

do you know f2.8 lenses?

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 08:55 UTC

F 3,5 and beautiful bokeh?

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2012 at 06:08 UTC as 43rd comment | 7 replies

This discussion is a documentation about the change of jobs in the digital age.

In Germany more and more people with digital cameras are looking for jobs and try wedding photography as working place because in the fields portrait, job-photos and children the prices fall down in the last years.

It is very interesting to find the discussion here because this shows the actual change in all parts of the world.

More and more people have digital cameras and more and more people want to earn money with it.

It is clear that "professionals" talk about the investment. But the question is what is a good wedding photo. And the reality shows that the standard has changed.

And the industray makes the rest: Albums can made online with very attractives covers for low price. Good photos can made with cheap cameras like a D3100 or a Canon 600D or other brands and so on.

Some people will say I want a photographer and I pay 1000/2000/3000 Dollars or more. But this group becomes smaller.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2012 at 09:12 UTC as 257th comment
Total: 36, showing: 21 – 36
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »