acidic

acidic

Lives in United States San Francisco, CA, United States
Joined on Nov 23, 2003

Comments

Total: 148, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

12-40mm/2.8 seems sweet, especially the push-pull AF/MF. Too bad it's bulkier than the Pana 12-35mm/2.8; I would've guessed otherwise, considering the Pana has O.I.S.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 01:30 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2143 comments in total)
In reply to:

FocusBogus: OM-D E-M1 sounds messy. Why not simply OM-D2? And then cheaper models OM-D20, OM-D200...

PEN is a weird choice for a camera name... it sounds like what I have in my pants.

I like the PEN name. I often thought they should emphasize the in-body image stabilization, and call it the PEN-IS. Then lazy forum posters can eliminate the hyphen like they do with the OM-D.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 01:01 UTC

"This new package will set you back $120 per year, which seems like a good deal, considering how often Adobe updates their products."

Adobe will have far less incentive to update their products frequently once everyone is on subscription.

Additionally, many like myself, did not upgrade to each and every new version. For the most part, I was perfectly happy skipping versions of Photoshop and upgrading to every other version.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 07:00 UTC as 77th comment | 2 replies

"Prior to Creative Cloud, a copy of Photoshop and Lightroom would've set you back around $400."

Ummmm..................................

No.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 06:57 UTC as 78th comment | 1 reply

I didn't see any mention of a tripod mount. If I'm going to be carrying around another device so I could take better pictures, I might as well carry a tripod for even better pictures.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 20:13 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply

It's obvious to anyone who understands HK politics that this is their way of making a point to mainland China about their pollution. What better way than to show the snap-happy mainland Chinese tourists what their country is doing to neighboring lands.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 01:35 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies

Snowboarders can stay in the parks and stick to the rails and other silly stuff.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2013 at 02:21 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

wootpile: Where is t-h-e f-l-i-p-s-c-r-e-e-n !?

still, they should have included a flip screen.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 08:21 UTC
On Photographer reveals massive 360-degree Tokyo panorama article (48 comments in total)

"And now you know that."

I already knew that. Please don't talk down to your audience.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 08:04 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: Number 1 is very nice and so is also number 4, IMHO. No 2 and 3 I can live without.

Lots of people here are very fast to call photos cr@p. I think they shall reconsider, and at least agree on that they think it is cr@p. Its not the same thing as saying it is cr@p.

#3 is perspective corrected (either that or he shot really wide and cropped the bottom). He shot from a level equal to that near the bottom of the photo.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 19:25 UTC
On Then and now: Photographing the Bay Bridge article (29 comments in total)
In reply to:

robjons: Having grown up in the area, you take the bridges for granted. I wonder why the new east span doesn't maintain the double-deck design of the original?

Because the double deck design results in quite a depressing roadway when traveling eastbound on the lower deck, which was originally used for a trolley. People traveling in both directions should be able to experience the open sky and views of the suspension tower.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2013 at 03:05 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)

Ummm... no print button? C'mon Canon, you can do better than that!!!

Wishlist for the 80D: TWO print buttons.

Posted on Jul 5, 2013 at 16:24 UTC as 375th comment
In reply to:

acidic: I just noticed the weight. 810g for APS-C lens? Holy Shatner!

Okay, I know it's super fast and all that, but if it's seriously supposed to convince FF shooters to go APS-C, it's measly 2x zoom range isn't helping any, considering that it's FF counterparts don't weigh much more and have closer to 3x zoom range. Of course if it's significantly cheaper, say in the $900 range, it could be a winner.

Yeah, I know that they can't be small with such (relatively) large apertures. But honestly, if this lens costs $2K and weighs as much as it does, why would someone choose a crop body and this lens over a FF body and a 24-70mm/2.8?

I acknowledge that this lens has more light gathering ability at a given FOV (than 24-70/2.8 on FF), but given that a FF body is easily 2 stops better (with regards to noise), the advantage goes to FF. Not to mention that this lens damn will need to resolve more lpm due to smaller pixels than it's FF counterpart.

Of course, if it's in the $900 range, this lens makes total sense.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 17:10 UTC

I just noticed the weight. 810g for APS-C lens? Holy Shatner!

Okay, I know it's super fast and all that, but if it's seriously supposed to convince FF shooters to go APS-C, it's measly 2x zoom range isn't helping any, considering that it's FF counterparts don't weigh much more and have closer to 3x zoom range. Of course if it's significantly cheaper, say in the $900 range, it could be a winner.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 05:13 UTC as 188th comment | 5 replies

Time to play guess the price.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 05:07 UTC as 192nd comment
In reply to:

justinwonnacott: I really want to see an option to customize the interface so that instead of drop down (scroll down forever . . . ) tabs it was possible to use horizontally tabbed menus or to "tear off" the RAW develop module so that it operates on a separate screen by itself.

When I use ACR module the layout is easier to use and does not require constant downward navigation and the annoying opening and closing of arrowed drop down tabs.

There is much that is good about LR's interface but this issue drives me nuts, slows me down and has me using ACR standalone quite often instead of the fiddly, small interface components provided in LR for the same task.

..... and another thing I really want is the ability to not just import to two drives but to see the changes I make, keywords, processing instructions and so on be writable to both of the copies I imported in the first place. I would love that.

Try solo mode:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/lightroom/using/WSD7BD0F8A-12B6-4064-99BA-2D844172C124.html

If you're drives are dedicated image drives, and you keep all of your changes withing LR (not sidecar xmp files), you can point LR to either of those drives and I believe the changes will apply, as long as the file names are the same across both drives.

Otherwise, configuring a RAID mirror will ensure that both drives are identical (changes, new files, deleting files, etc). Still not substitute for a real backup drive though.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 17:03 UTC
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

hexxthalion: another forgettable gray plastic box from Canon - why do they bother?

because they make money from such gray plastic boxes.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 18:47 UTC
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

itsastickup: I'm seriously not understanding why people are comparing this APS-C camera to m4/3.

m4/3 still has serious bokeh issues: too much depth of field even with large apertures. Unless you go off-piste, you can't get a normal lens with any kind of decent ability to obliterate the background. And no, I don't want t a Nokton 25/.95, or whatever it's called. APS-C isn;t as great as FF of course, but it's still workable.

You also don't get Canon's bokeh king zooms. I looked at other systems and either they have not enough OOF bokeh or like Sony and Nikon they have have poor bokeh zooms.

There is no system out there that does what Canon APS-C cameras do.

Of course, if you don't care for such a thing as very limited bokeh then it's a non-issue, but it's still an issue for the rest of us and so it's not correct to directly compare this system to m4/3. There is no direct comparison (yet).

You don't understand what bokeh means. Bokeh is subjective quality, not something there is too much of or too little of.

You're obviously referring to depth of field, which bokeh is NOT inversely related to.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 17:17 UTC
On Canon EOS 100D/Rebel SL1 Hands-on Preview preview (355 comments in total)

It's even lighter than the OM-D! If they could only make some small pancake primes in EF-S mount to go with this...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 06:30 UTC as 137th comment | 2 replies
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)

You know, if Canon could make a few more pancakes but limit the mount to EF-S for compactness, they might be on to something here. The 40mm STM is fantasically small on my 5D2. If there were even smaller EF-S pancake primes in 20mm and 60mm ranges, it could make for an interesting kit for those already invested in EF gear. If I weren't already heavily invested in m4/3 gear (in addition to Canon FF), then I would certainly consider jumping in.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 06:26 UTC as 117th comment
Total: 148, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »