CameraLabTester: Leica will soon be coming out with a PATCH for older models of their cameras...
It is a sturdy tough black tape to PATCH over your existing LCD screens.
A bargain at $857.99 on line stores only, while supply lasts.
I will wait for the Chinese knock offs to show up on eBay, for $2.99.
How will the chimps survive?
OMG, I'm going to get one of these
if I see it on sale for 99 cents.
brazzy: DO NOT FLY DRONES ABOVE CROWDS. NEVER.I do not know about FAA rules, as I don't live in the US, but this is the first unwritten requirement that every operator should have in his mind.Mr. Johnson did something very good by going at dawn on Friday to take his footage, then something very wrong by flying above people on Saturday afternoon. He has been unlucky he couldn't get what he wanted on the very first time, but hey, this happens to all landscape photographers.I am not against drone photography and I appreciate his work. I fly my Phantom 4 in Tokyo area and I get the same smooth videos - it works just great. But it's just too dangerous, you never know what may happen: Phantom 4 is reliable but the unexpected is always behind the corner.I do hope that watching this beautiful video and picture won't stimulate other people to do the same. Dpreview should be careful about promoting this kind of footage.DO NOT FLY DRONES ABOVE CROWDS.
"...drones are so scarce in relation to cars that the risk factor also drops significantly."
The risk of any one person being involved in a motor vehicle incident is much greater...
But how about the risk of any one drone being involved in an incident vs any one vehicle?
Again, my point was mainly about the public benefits of autos vs drones.
" 'Idiot operators' are the risk, not drones or anything else."
Many more if you bother searching for them.
A while back, when I was reading reviews of one of the DJI units on various websites. There were enough stories about drones that have gone rogue and the drone + GoPro were lost forever (and they have to come down or fall down somewhere). Not sure if this is all due to "idiot operators" or faulty hardware, but it seems to be enough of an occurrence that drones should generally not be operated over people.
"Don't see them trying to outlaw motor vehicles anytime soon though..."
Think about the public benefit that motor vehicles provide.
Now think about the same with drones.
Risk–benefit analysis, something many photographers don't understand.
"According to US statistics 4500 people were killed last year just crossing a street."
You should be comparing probabilities between the likelihood a drone will injure someone below vs an auto injuring a pedestrian. Absolute numbers don't make for a good argument here. auto-pedestrian-incidents/auto-hours/day vs drone-incidents/drone-hours/day.
I will get this and then get a custom Moto X with matching leather. Then I can control one with the other.
Hasa: Beautiful design! I need a Nikon version, please FF & mirror-less, 20-24 Mpix. 4K "HDR" video downsampled from fulll size sensor. Adapters for any FF Nikon with AF and other glass, Canon, Minolta etc..
You should send Nikon a wish list of features for the Df MkII,
ByronP: Obviously, the reviewer is trying to find something wrong. There was a picture of pros at the recent super bowl game where about 70% of them were using Canon lens. These are professionals and they can pick whatever camera system that fits their needs. They make their living taking images. If they or their gear does not capture money making photos, they starve. I trust their judgments more than any review, good or bad.
If I'm not mistaken, another benefit for Canon sports shooters is that CPS is on site at most major sporting events.
Camera Joey: So, does the 80D focus better than my brother with ADD?
I have a catalog of film scans of out of focus gray cards taken with various film stocks. Back in the earlier days of digital, I often added real film grain to some of my images by layering on one of these scans in photoshop. The reason was that a low-ISO digital image looked way too smooth and artificial and sterile.
So I see film grain is back in fashion. Is it just a retro/hipster thing?
The photo that illustrates this article at the top of the page is very fitting. Those men, sitting precariously on a beam, reading what I assume are their unfavorable contracts. Thank you Getty Images.
All of the haters of this product:
- don't live in Japan where this product will be offered,
- are too old to realize many people communicate just fine on a day to day basis without using their voice minutes on their cell phone plan.
"The New York Public Library has released more than 180,000 digitized items into the public domain, making them freely available for anyone to use for any purpose."
Any purpose? Even commercial ones (i.e. advertisements)? Even of those containing living persons? Just because images are in the public domain doesn't mean that model releases aren't required for certain uses.
acidic: "It also includes a retractable hood like the one found on the M.Zuiko Digital 50-150 F2.8 IS Pro."
M.Zuiko Digital 50-150 F2.8 IS Pro
I've never heard of this lens. 50-150mm f/2.8 with OIS sounds like a dream of a tele-zoom. Please tell me more.
Are you sure? Because that's what I suspected, that they were talking about the 40-150mm 2.8. But then the inclusion of "IS" caught my attention, which the 40-150mm does not have.
In any case, I'm sure you're right. Just a case of poor editorial review.
Johannes Zander: My Olympus ED 150 mm f/2.0 with EC20 is just as good. Only AF might not be as fast as with the new lens. I don't see any super sharpness!Bokeh is average.
"Granny 43 crashed our hipster m43 party..."
Hipsters love retro stuff, just like grannies. Give it a few more years, the hipsters will migrate from Lomos to 4/3.
"It also includes a retractable hood like the one found on the M.Zuiko Digital 50-150 F2.8 IS Pro."
thx1138: LOL at the price. Seriously delusional. The mirrorless fanbois would be in hysterics if Canikon released a 300 f/4 that cost $2500. Hell the Nikon with DO technology is only $2K and has to be corrected for a 4x larger sensor.
300mm f/4= 600mm f/4= 600mm f/8= 450mm f5.6= ?So these are all essentially the same?
I didn't hear any mention of refrigerators. Pffff, typical Nikon.