tulo

tulo

Lives in Sweden Sweden
Joined on Jul 15, 2009

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14

why cant someone just give us the details on how the viewfinder and MF differs from the X100 and we'll all know for sure if this is something to even bother with...?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 18:47 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

tulo: push button interfaces really push my buttons!
no sale for you panasonic - and dont come back until you added some proper controls!

yes - i'll never manage to happely buy crap, but that's how things are made nowadays it seems...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 21:05 UTC
In reply to:

tulo: push button interfaces really push my buttons!
no sale for you panasonic - and dont come back until you added some proper controls!

no. what makes you think that?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 15:48 UTC
In reply to:

Lan: Is the display autostereographic, or is it 2d/glasses? I can't tell from the spec above...

my take is that the minuscule stereo base is choosen to hide the fact that the touch display doesnt show proper 3D.

how well would a touch screen work on a autostereographic display anyway? the tactile and visual feedback when touching the actual display surface would totally mess with depth perception.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 13:36 UTC

push button interfaces really push my buttons!
no sale for you panasonic - and dont come back until you added some proper controls!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 13:30 UTC as 32nd comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

Bryan Campbell: I'm curious to see how this compares to RED's cameras.

Also note that Engadget says the 3 new primes will work on our still cameras... Assuming that wasn't an error. The new 50mm 1.3L this could be the 50mm that everyone has been begging for.

Engadget " 7:41PM There's three EF prime lenses as well, 24mm, 50mm, and 85mm models. They also work well with EOS still image cameras as well. "

"The new 50mm 1.3L this could be the 50mm that everyone has been begging for."
couldnt it just be the 50/1.2L that already exists in a new packaging?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2011 at 01:05 UTC
In reply to:

Ashley Pomeroy: Coo - but is that 35mm full-frame, or another format?

if it is a super-35 sensor, it should be closer to APS-C in DSLR terms

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2011 at 01:01 UTC
On Fujifilm releases FinePix REAL 3D V3 viewer article (36 comments in total)

i'd be interested in a viewer like this one if it also had a 3D image editing interface.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2011 at 13:21 UTC as 12th comment
In reply to:

tkbslc: Okay, it sorta makes sense on the dedicated video camera since Panasonic doesn't have any f2.8 zooms. But for still shots, well, there are a lot of nice used Canon bodies you can get for the $440 price tag. might as well just get the real thing.

olympus got a couple of /f2.0/ zooms though. (in 4/3 mount)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2011 at 10:20 UTC
On 3D Video Primer, Part 2 article (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

tulo: i never managed to understand the use of "toe-in"/converging optical axis for close focusing like in the Sony TD10. it is the OA of the viewer's eyes that are supposed to converge, giving a sense of depth - not the OA of imaging device, is it?

"converges the position on the 3D plane"
what is that supposed to mean?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2011 at 20:45 UTC
On 3D Video Primer, Part 2 article (27 comments in total)

i never managed to understand the use of "toe-in"/converging optical axis for close focusing like in the Sony TD10. it is the OA of the viewer's eyes that are supposed to converge, giving a sense of depth - not the OA of imaging device, is it?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2011 at 17:55 UTC as 9th comment | 6 replies

i dont care much for GRD, but this must bode well for the GXR II...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 11:19 UTC as 12th comment

"...the first model from the new family of lenses developed
specifically for Micro Four Thirds system."

interesting!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2011 at 10:52 UTC as 6th comment

*every time* i see a gallery preview matrix like the one is this post, i try to click a specific image expecting to get a view of that one in particular.
*every time* i get confused and a litte disappointed when i realise that i'm going to have to go through the entire gallery to refind the image i was interested in...

i think you (dpreview.com staff) should reconsider how these gallery previews are functioning and/or presented.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14