ET2

ET2

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 650, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Sony Alpha 7S added to test scene comparison tool article (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: Not as good as the Pentax K3 in low light

He just wanted to pitch in K-3 advertisement in the topic -- which even isn't the best APSC in lowlight. Fuji ones are better.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 19:13 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7S added to test scene comparison tool article (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

aarif: excellent now if it only had a better AF to go with the low light performance I would have bought it, not in love with it's battery performance too

The CDAF AF would be a lot better on A7s than on A7 as bigger pixels would help in lowlight with CDAF, I think

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 19:10 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

Philly: What is the aperture at 200mm equivalent? EDIT: just saw chart in preview. So it's @ f4 already at 200mm equivalent.

F4 at 150mmm

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 05:06 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

beril2013: i want a camera that takes excellent photos and excellent video for family.. Taking photos of my daughter while she is swimming at the beach etc... My budget is $1000 . I don't want a DSLR. Is the rx100 iii suitable for me? or can i get something better for $1000? size doesn't matter by the way.

If you don't care about the pocket size and can increase the budget a little, RX10 would be pretty cool. It's weather sealed and has larger more versatile zoom

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 00:20 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valentinian: What is the competition ?
Lumix LX-8 - same sensor size; 24-90mm (equivalent); F 2-2.8
to be announced July 16

It will be very interesting reading DPR's comparison of the two cameras.

If it's announced on July 16, it will ship in Sept/Oct, given panasonic history.

That leaves RX100 III 3 to 4 months to lock potential buyers without competition

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 03:48 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

kits: Wonder how the video compares to RX10?

Video section is already in the preview

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 02:05 UTC
On Sony a6000 Review preview (714 comments in total)
In reply to:

G1Houston: Is the lack of an external charger really a negative?

I have come to appreciate the fact that when I carry these cameras on a trip, I do not have to pack all the bulky chargers with them. I just have to bring a single USB cable that I already use to charge my phone and tablet. Is that really so difficult to charge a separate battery at night time in the camera? It is also possible to use those external batteries we have for the smartphone to quick charge the "camera" in the filed. I thus suggest Dpreview to reconsider calling the lack of external charger a "pro," to encourage companies to simply the accessary. It drives me mad that each one of my camera has a different battery with a different charger.

Jeff Keller puts this "con" everytime he reviews cameras but never mentions that being able to charge with USB without carrying a charger is a big po. You can charge while driving, on a plane, in a hotel, etc.

This seems to be Jeff Keller personal agenda, even though external charger with two batteries (made by third parties) included are less than $20 on amazon

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 17:20 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

dwl017: Who exactly is this camera design for? John Doe and his his wife with two kids? or the hipster single guy with disposal cash? The $800 price point seems massive to me given the fact that its still a point and shoot camera. I also disagree with the whole pocketable argument since I doubt very few people are shoving there new $800 gadget into a pants pocket.

So again back to my original question just who sets out on a saturday afternoon to buy a $800 point and shoot camera and how exactly is the price justified given the fact that 90% of the photos taken around the world today are only posted to Facebook, Twitter, Flickr or Instagram. Depending on the state you live in within the US this is $850 camera when tax are added.

Perhaps the original Sony RX100 might even be a better option at the end of the day? price point wise. I did a quick Flickr scan of the Canon S120 and all the photos look no different from the current Sony RX100 model.

If you can't see or need quality and performance difference between S120 and RX100, just stick to your cellphone.

This is a camera for people who want a pocketable camera with better image quality and are capable of seeing the difference in image quality and performance.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2014 at 03:44 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eleson: I'm curious about full sensor readout. Is that actually true?

No, rolling shutter has nothing to do with full sensor read out. That's a different property of CMOS sensors.

Full sensor read out means the camera does not skip pixels and lines to reduce 20 MP to full HD (around 2 MP). It reads all 20 MPs and then downsamples it correctly for Full HD

Most DSLRs and still cameras skip pixels that results in lower quality video (lower resolution and moire.)

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2014 at 21:01 UTC
On Sony announces pricing and availability for Alpha 7S article (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: Pretty expensive considering the fact that you need an external 4k recorder to be able to use this camera to its full.

Not to mention that Full HD video quality would be much higher than 5D III, as it's full sensor readout (all 12 MP) that is downsampled to Full HD

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 07:05 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: "does the RX100 III remain the ultimate compact camera for enthusiasts?"

No. It is now the ultimate compact for enthusiasts.

Carl

Thanks for speaking for all "enthusiasts". Who appointed you?

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 05:54 UTC
On Sony SLT-A77 II First Impressions Review preview (599 comments in total)
In reply to:

DaddyG: 12fps in jpeg. Anyone know what does it does in RAW & buffer size? thx

12 fps in raw (25 or 28 frames buffer - seen different numbers on different sites)

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 19:30 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

joyclick: K3 gets 83% (after all attempts to avoid reviewing it at all don't justify) and XT1 follows on its heels and gets 84%

LOL @ Pentax fanboys again whining

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 18:03 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7S in low-light: See video at ISO 409,600 article (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

citizen2012: 8-bit video? I would hold on to my savings...

Yeah, like other DSLRs and mirrorless do anything else but 8-bit. Even Canon 1DC does 8-bit (along with GH3). GH4 is the only exception but requires external recorder for 10 bis. Internal recording even on GH4 is 8bit 4:2:0

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 14:21 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7S in low-light: See video at ISO 409,600 article (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

Superka: Low light capability is great! But this is not all!!!
Lets see its Rolling Shutter!
It would be severe, I suppose.

Don't shake camera like crazy. Even Alexa has rolling shutter, but it has been "A" (main) camera to shoot almost all Hollywood movies in the past 2 years.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 20:50 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7S in low-light: See video at ISO 409,600 article (244 comments in total)
In reply to:

EOSHD: You can't judge noise levels on YouTube. Compression removes it. ISO 1600 looks worse than 25,600. There's also the matter of rolling shutter on this camera, it isn't pretty! http://www.eoshd.com/content/12631/sony-a7s-rolling-shutter-test

Larger sensor with so much much more surface area is going to have rolling shutter (without global shutter)

Use the tiny sensor m4/3 camera if you don't want rolling shutter

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 17:00 UTC

This is the most stupid thing of the year so far. Someone forgot to inform JVC that super 35mm sensor is bigger than M4/3 (the mount they choose for the camera).

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 05:27 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

iAPX: Sony A7s yesterday and now is the BlackMagic answer for digital film cinema.

For serious cinema, it's clearly a great piece, upgradeable in so many ways, and yet so complete out-of-the-box! The tag price is incredibly low considering all the features!

"Sony A7s yesterday and now is the BlackMagic answer for digital film cinema."

It's NAB show in Las Vegas

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 19:35 UTC

recorder for a7S

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-THzgdsRTZM

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 17:43 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: Why buy this camera if it doesn't work out of the box as advertised?

4K video is only there when you buy additional hardware.
12 MP on itself is not of these days anymore, although it will deliver good images at high ISO's (if Sony Digital Imaging doesn't screw up, like they often seem to do - Great sensors, but bad camera development).

This not the definition of a 4K camera. C500 is a $20,000 4K camera but requires external recorder to record 4K. It's still called a 4K camera.

I don't think you have a clue what you are talking about. Please stop

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 07:15 UTC
Total: 650, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »