firstname.lastname@example.org: Raw: D810 vs A7R2 vs 5DR:I'd pick the Nikon for sharpness, noise, resolution, color.All good. Very subjective.
You have provided zero evidence that lens creates colors.
"colour is about the lens mostly"
Np, it isn't. Colors have nothing to do with lenses.
Notice the guy doesn't even understand Foveon sensor. It's same RGB concept but a pixel is stacked on fact that red wavelength penetrates deeper than green that penetrates deeper thn blue.
Now what does this have anything to do with a lens? Absolutely nothing.
The guy is absolute idiot and note not once he was able to explain the secret sauce inside the lens that creates color. There is no such thing inside the lens
More mumbo jumbo pseudo science combined with anecdotal claims. Just trust this clown, because he said it's true, even though he has no engineering and scientific explanation on how a magical sauce is inserted inside the lens that creates color, but just trust this guy. He has seen it himself, just as he has seen the UFOs. It's there.
The guy who just a few days ago said, ""colour is about the lens mostly"" is telling people they don't know anything colors.
According to him, colors are really really made by magic sauce inside lens. How that magic sauce works, what's the scientific engineering logic behind it, he doesn't know. Just trust this guy. Colors are really made by magic sauce inside the lense.
No shortage of stupid pseudo science on the internet.
"How are they empty claims? I've used/owned, tried and rented better lenses."
That's not based on a fact or science. It's anecdotal statements. Well, since you says so it must become true that colors are made by lenses. Yeah, sure.
"colour is about the lens mostly"
No, it's not dummy. Scientific fact is that colors are the result of RGB filter (only three wavelengths) and the rest is software interpolation. It's as simple as that. There is no magical sauce in the lens that creates colors. That exists only in your gullible brain.
Once again, all empty claims and anecdotal statements without shred of evidence.
Scientific fact is that colors are the result of RGB filter (only three wavelengths) and the rest is software interpolation. This is an actual fact on how colors are generated.
HowaboutRAW, who just a few days ago told us "colour is about the lens mostly" claims there is a magical sauce (that he can't explain how it works or where it comes from and can't prove it) inside the lens that generates colors.
No shortage of stupid people.
HowaboutRAW, you have not posted any proof for your claims just empty words and hallow claims.
Colors are really easy to manipulate -- as they are just software interpretation from RGB filer. It is not some deep secret voodoo magic and secret sauce in lenses that generate colors. You are an idiot. It's simply RGB filer (only three wavelengths) and the rest is software interpolation. A Hollywood colorist is able to match two shots taken with various different cameras and different lenses. No problem.
You said, "colour is about the lens mostly."
What an idiotic statement.
cgarrard: Watching Sony since they bought out Konica Minolta has been very interesting. But only in the last 3 years have I seen significant changes in the way they listen to the consumers, implement changes, and improve the products as a result. They are slowly but surely acting more like a smaller camera company than a larger one - and THAT is a good thing.
Someone at Sony got the message, at this point I don't see that it will be much longer for them to make even more changes to cater to professionals and high end enthusiasts alike- so long as they keep the giant SSS Sony on the right path that is.
That's a long winded way of saying- keep improving Sony, your doing the right thing after the initial few frustrating years after you acquired KM.
You aren't making any sense. I didn't say Sony hired me. I know that you and all your fellow cohorts (walt knapp, barry fitzgerald) were against Nex and E-mount.
Remember how you won't even create a sub forum for Nex on your website? LOL. How you never even bothered to review the original Nex and started posting review of the Panasonic and competition around that time, on a website named ironically alphamount? Short memories you have there.
Sony got back on track in spite of A-mount trolls (who were against EVF, against E-mount, and your title for RX100 was "too little too late"), not because of it .
Thanks, and my point stands, that E-mount and EVF was booed by all these I mentioned (includes you), so Sony got back on track in spite of A-mount trolls, not because of it.
AV link does not prove your point. The link is talking about chromatic aberration. All you have done so far is post anecdotal claims. Nothing more
MediaDigitalVideo: Courious how much % processor consumption is needed to run the 4K screen.
On IPS panels (unlike Oled) most of the battery life is wasted by blackit light. GPU will work harder, but I don't think it have that much impact on battery life.
HowaboutRAW, stop posting the same lie over and over again. Lenses have absolutely nothing to do with color.
Notice how the guy keeps repeating the same thing about Nikon and Canon without ever posting any evidence that colors are mostly controled by lenses as he claimed yesterday.
Nikon is doing research on what? Post proof, dude, not empty statements.
Even if your statement about color cast with Sigma lens is true, it could be easily corrected by software. Probably you had white balance issue with that particular lens.
I didn't like my comment. I don't think I did. You got that wrong, as you get about everything about cameras wrong.
HowaboutRAW, you are an idiot. You said "colour is about the lens mostly." The most idiotic statement ever posted by someone on these forums.
"good lenses improve the quality of the light in the image."
What an idiotic bunch of pseudoscience. Good lenses are sharp. Good lenses have less chromatic aberration. Good lenses have less flare.
Good lenses have absolutely zero to do with color
"And you neglected the fact that B+W cameras exist. You explicitly wrote:"
I neglected black and white cameras because we are talking about colors. DUH. Is this guy really this stupid in real life or is he simply trolling?
No, lenses don't have impact on color. Colors are almost completely the function of RGB color filter combined with interpolation by software algorithm.
This guy keeps digging himself in deeper hole the more he posts. Yeah, Leica M Monochrome doesn't have color filter, because it takes black and white pictures. DUH
Despite being told how color works (RGB filter plus the missing color samples are interpolated using a demosaicing algorithm), the guy keeps posting the same stupid thing that colors comes mostly from lenses over and over again.
It's like talking to conspiracy people who believe earth is flat or like people who believe humans never landed on the moon. It's like their brain is immune to logic and science.
Adrian Van, nano coating has nothing to do with color. They are designed to avoid reflections and fare.
"I think you mean most digital cameras work that way, though certainly not all."
By most you obviously mean ALL except Sigma Foveon. Even X-Trans is simply RGB filter arranged differently.
The more you post the more idiotic you sound. Colors have nothing to do with lenses. It's almost entirely software and strength of color filter.
What irony with a name like "HowaboutRAW", the guy says
Is there a way to ban stupid people?