 |
intruder61
Lives in
Australia
Joined on
Jan 2, 2009
|
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
one of the better "inventions" made for photography.
this is going to be good.
lol.....next planet.
finally
say hello to Steve Huff while you're there.
nothing special....granted it was the kit lens.
now the fools will be happy
at the size and weight they have made it, if it had a FF sensor we would be all oooh and ahhhh, but unfortunately no, just another camera.
"groundbreaking milestone".......thats as far as i got to reading the above.
this ME comes in at 5450, it does the same thing as the M9.....so much for those who want to sell their M9's used for a decent price.
amicus70: The design is familiar... it's nearly the Leica Digilux 3 or Panasonic DMC-L1. Not very creative.
apparently, it records images.
boring....next
JackM: So $800 for this or $1200 for the Fuji X100... hmm... $400 is just on the cusp of a reasonable premium for a VF and manual controls. Wish there were more manual controls on this.
the X100 is now $800.....forget the canon
Fail!!
the Illuminati are behind this, funded by the Bilderbergers.....they want to rid most of Canon users because they are Nikon users.
nice and all, if your into head shots....otherwise a useless FL.
divine
just another camera, nothing special, nothing bad, just not awe inspiring.
horses for courses boys, and some race horses cost more than others, and all owners have fun....lets move on.
...AND whats the difference with Nikon/Canon boys :) shooting 300/400/500/600 primes worth as much for their photography?
fail
shaocaholica: There's a solution many M9 owners have for the lackluster rear LCD. Just lose it altogether. When you shot film, you don't know what the photo looked like till it was developed and that 'charm' is missing when shooting digital so if you're going in for a penny on retro handling you might as well go in for a pound.
....better still, just use leica film bodies.