karlwunsch: Please, DPReview, make a head-to-head comparison of a77II and 7dmk2.
Of course there is nothing wrong with asking for a comparison.
My catch question intended to get some arguments for discussion.There are no real standardized test routines the score and the judgement of a camera is mainly based on the personal impression of its test engineer.
But again, what is the sense of its outcome?
Why are begging for a comparison inter-brand?
What interesting results could come out?
Well done Sony. The IBIS and the XAVCS are reason to jump onto this horse.Hope they'll bring an A7RII, too, because I'd directly go for that camera.
Why is it mandatory to be a pro photographer?
I am advanced enthusiast, owning A900/A99/A7R/A7S and all G/Z lenses except 35G/70300G/500G.Not enough to be recognized as a support-worthy customer. Unbelievable.
F..k o.f, Sony...
I would interpret this advertisement saying that they did something what nobody believed Canon would ever do.
Coming up with a WL portable printer or another DSLR would make no sense in my mind.
As they didn't extend the EOS-M series and witnessed the success of Sony's A7x I could imagine they are coming up with a FF ML.
abortabort: Still no word, despite visiting and reporting on the Sony booth, from DPR about the prototype lenses announced and previewed at photokina? No I supposed that would go against what DPR believe in.
I don't mind this this ignorance anymore. Had a chance to put my fingers onto a 7DII at the Canon booth.Nice one, but in my eyes not more than an A77II, but clearly ahead of the D7100. That's different class to be honest.And read what they wrote about the NX1 - blabla "cheap dials".The NX1 is a competitor for the top class APS-C.
ephankim: Why aren't all the lens prototypes (28/2, 90/2.8 G Macro, 35/1.4 ZA & 24-240) included in this report?
They were all only shown in a closed showcase. For "normal" visitors no hands on possible.
I tried to get an answer related to the G macro - wanted to know whether it's an all IF design or the tube extends at higher magnification.Impossible. Three Sony guys couldn't answer, and the third one asked his boss - nothing. Same went for my question related to the awkward ADI of the new 32 flash gun (and all others...) - when used as fill flash it overexposed by roughly 1 1/3 stop. Again no chance.That's really annoying that they don't have properly trained guys around.
I visited PK14 today, and was very interested in the NX1.
The person I talked was quite competend on specs and usage, and because I was an early bird this morning, there was no big crowd at their booth.So I had a chance to try it with the most interesting "S" branded lenses - the 1650/2.8 OIS, the new 50150/2.8 OIS and the 85/1.4.
It feels very solid, the lenses are very good. And I don't think that the dials are "cheap".
The also prepared a nice scene for video capability presentation. And they showed the NX in diferent pro-alike rigs. The recording was live streamed onto a big screen, and the 4k looked pretty well.
Can't judge it overally professional, but what I have seen, and what I did with it - kudos!
Regarding battery life just respect basic rule number 1.
1) Always, absolutely always keep a spare battery in your camera bag.2) Always, absolutely always keep a spare memory card in your camera bag.
Absolutic: just like with Sony E lenses, the same story repeats. They are releasing a large number of slow 18-1XX (now 28-XX or 24-XX) all in one lenses. No 85 even on the map. I guess the 90/2.8 that you won't get for almost a year is supposed to be your 85. Or use 85 A size lenses with LA-EA4 adapter. I am not even talking about 135FE. not even 85 on the map. Clearly Fuji has a much better lineup now and it is here now. Fuji also has 90/2 (135 equivalent) on the map. Sony is just repeating themselves with their lens history of E mount
Hm. Somehow incoherent what you are mentioning. Comparing apples and oranges. Actually I don't care what FB you are - although apparent - but I don't like this bullshitting from one brand to other in an unobjective way.At first you compare an APS-C system with a FF system. Secondly you compare a system that's longer than 2 years on the market with one that's not even a year available.I don't see a 85 from Fuji. But if you compare the 56/1.2 as a 85 equivalent, then Sony has the 50/1.8 or the Zeiss 55/1.8. And a 90mm is also not available from Fuji yet, and if it is to come, then the Sony does so, too.
If you like Fuji more - fair enough - go and be happy with this gear; it's actually a pretty good one. But please stop doing what I mentioned above...
Additionally for first/second quarter 15:
FE 28/2 (+16mm Fisheye Converter, + 21mm UWA converter)FE 35/1.4 ZA90/2.8 OSS G macroFE 24-200/3.5-6.3
Scottelly: This is pretty funny. This thing has twice the memory of my MacBook Air. lol
The biggest, most expensive MacBook Pro Apple makes come with a hard drive that is only the same capacity as this little card. lol
How pathetic is THAT?!? lol
My MBP has 1TB SSD :-)
miles green: Looks nice. Very nice actually.But interesting choice of name: "Loxia" in Greek means: not straight, crooked...
Loxia is a bird of the finch family and the name giver.
Specs are sounding interesting. If the built quality keeps what it promises, than also the MSRP would be fair.
"...only 1080p.."ONLY???? Cmon, it's a cell phone. Who does really want and/or need 4k in a cell phone?
Fazal Majid: It's 2014. A camera's video features are not "impressive" if it's not 4K.
@BrandonExactly. Even if 4k is not a topic for a pro he will likely go for another camera that suits usage of accessories in a better way.
4k is imo overrated at this time - at least for the SOHO market.Most 4k screens are only supporting 30Hz, 4k TV sets are still too expensive, most broadcasters are only supporting 720p because the overall infrastructure is still not fully compliant to 1080p.Here in Germany the national broadcasters have a 4k schedule for 2018 at the earliest. Some privates and pay TV will be the first ones.
dbo: It is the contest itself to be criticised.
Don't get me wrong - most of the ideas the guys have had are ok, and the composing looks fine for the purpose.
However almost no image has left its authenticity of the moment it was taken.A lot of the winning images don't have a natural look anymore. And, and, and.
Nice arts anyway, but the name of the contest is a joke and potentially blinds reviewers.
A photography contest shall be contest where captured images are in competition. Any falsifying shall be forbidden. If at all post processed than limited to setting compensation (wb, exp comp, etc.).
I am no native english tongue so I assume I did not chose the right words to say what I wanted to say.
It was not my intention to blame heavy post processed photos - I assume I did not.I am well aware that this is part of modern photography these days (and some older days, too).
The point for me is that this contest has had the intention to reward the best image captured by an iPhone and not to reward the best creation out of photoshop or whatever program.
It is the contest itself to be criticised.
Didn't we got this video in DP a couple of month ago together with the blackmagic stuff?