JurijTurnsek

JurijTurnsek

Joined on Jan 25, 2013

Comments

Total: 71, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JurijTurnsek: Lets use this oppurtunity to let the product planning team that we want new APS-C lenses!

Chicken or the egg? How can you gauge the need for new (better) lenses by how many lenses are bought by the exsisting users, who simply won't buy lesser spec'd lenses and keep their primary DSLR system and treat mirrorless as a travel camera.

For example, John Smith might not abandon his Canon 60D with a 17-55 f2.8 for A6300, since he cannot get a native lens that he desires.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 22:00 UTC

Lets use this oppurtunity to let the product planning team that we want new APS-C lenses!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 19:46 UTC as 118th comment | 6 replies

Love the pull-out tilt and rotate screen - Sony should copy that.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 21:30 UTC as 91st comment | 1 reply
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (365 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tim C.: Focusing on solely on APS-C and possibly medium format makes sense to me. Why choose to enter the 35mm market already dominated by Canon, Nikon, and Sony? It'd be an uphill battle.

APS-C remains the sweet spot for mirrorless (size vs. image quality). Hopefully, Sony won't forget that.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

JurijTurnsek: Why bother producing the non-VR version? Does this mean that low range Dx bodies will get the lesser kit lens and the mid rangers will get the VR version?

VR is must for anyone doing video. Maybe someone newbie will create a myth that the non-VR version is so much sharper ;)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 09:42 UTC

Why bother producing the non-VR version? Does this mean that low range Dx bodies will get the lesser kit lens and the mid rangers will get the VR version?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 08:57 UTC as 40th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: Hmmm... I'd like to see some great sample images taken with this beast.

Scroll down: https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/Camera-Systems/XF100MP.aspx

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 17:04 UTC
In reply to:

sibuzaru: I'm curious to see how the Canon version with a speedbooster would be like.

So, what is the point then? You introduce another piece of glass that degrades IQ and gain FF bokeh and FOV on APS-C crop. But you have a FF sensor with a lot more pixels that you paid big money for.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2015 at 16:26 UTC
In reply to:

sibuzaru: I'm curious to see how the Canon version with a speedbooster would be like.

But with bokeh the same as F1.4 on FF?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2015 at 15:20 UTC
In reply to:

sibuzaru: I'm curious to see how the Canon version with a speedbooster would be like.

The lens is fully utilized as is on a FF sensor, why would you use a speedbooster?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2015 at 13:30 UTC
On Connect post Pulse aims to bring advanced wireless control to your DSLR (43 comments in total)

Without a live-view, this is indeed useless.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2015 at 06:54 UTC as 10th comment

Examples look great. JPEGmini option would be a welcome addition to any camera.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 13:23 UTC as 113th comment
On article Second time lucky? A closer look at Sony's new RX1R II (542 comments in total)
In reply to:

rhurani: Sony san! for me please the same camera without EVF, without tilting of the LCD, without the filter, but with a built-in flash, a 24MP-only FF for 700$. Deal?

This would be caller the original RX1. Not you just need to wait a year for the used price to fall so low.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00 UTC
In reply to:

JurijTurnsek: Most comments read: "I would love it if I had the cash, but since I don't, this camera is rubbish."

A second generation proves that there is a market for such a camera. And you are aware of the alternatives - only the Leica Q. But there are many way to spend $3000 and no one is forcing you to spend it on a RX1RII if you don't want to. Maybe you should google how precise the manufacturing process for this camera is and maybe then you will understand the pricing.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2015 at 07:36 UTC

Can anyone point me to the data that shows RX1/R as a flop? These two cameras have incredibly high re-sale value and will have it for the foreseeable future.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2015 at 10:55 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies

Most comments read: "I would love it if I had the cash, but since I don't, this camera is rubbish."

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2015 at 19:37 UTC as 102nd comment | 5 replies

4 bodies and 5 lenses? Sounds familiar? ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 13, 2015 at 06:24 UTC as 55th comment
On article Light L16 packs 16 cameras into a single portable body (390 comments in total)

Right now we have multi-shot noise reduction - could this thing do multiple simultaneous shots reduction using multiple sensors? This thing has potential and the form-factor (just add the phone bits) is perfect for the current generation.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2015 at 05:33 UTC as 103rd comment

A Lenovo Yoga type of a configuration seems the best solution - use the regular laptop mode to adjust all the sliders and input the text and then flip it to a tablet mode and do corrections with a stylus. But the Yoga line lacks pressure sensitivity for the stylus.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2015 at 12:38 UTC as 82nd comment | 1 reply

The best thing Samyang could do now is to add a chip with EXIF info and a switch for de-clicking the aperture like the Zeiss Loxia series.

And Sony has to release an APS-C IBIS body in the near future.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2015 at 12:30 UTC as 16th comment
Total: 71, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »