madeinlisboa

madeinlisboa

Lives in Portugal Portugal
Joined on Nov 4, 2005

Comments

Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

Thank you!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 01:22 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

I don't want to undo changes nor search a list with hundreds of entries for something that could be listed apart. Besides, with the history, my catalog main file reaches 1GB in no time.
Why should the Virtual Copy be useful if my problem is not finding the adjustment points on a photo???

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 22:04 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

I've just said some are missing amid the image details. Sometimes I have to search hard to find them, specially on a QHD+ screen. A list would be much easier to work with

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 21:17 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

@Don Kiyoti: Why?
@Hugo808: Try to find all gradients, radial, spots and brushes applied among hundreds of entries in the history...

Besides, I don't want to undo changes. Just to know which filters were applied and where. Some adjustment points almost get lost in some images and are very hard to find

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 20:44 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

Thanks. I knew that. I'm afraid it is not useful at all. With dozens of changes it would be impossible to track them. And, for performance reasons, I delete the history regularly. I wonder why such useful feature is not implemented. A simple plug-in would do the trick.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 18:26 UTC

Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 18:01 UTC as 124th comment | 13 replies

I think I'll change my hobby to fishing....

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2014 at 12:00 UTC as 17th comment
On UK Landscape Photographer of the Year winners announced article (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

jkjond: Excellent winner this year. It is encouraging to see this competition is maturing above the predictable winners of yesteryear.

you're kidding, right?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2014 at 21:08 UTC
On UK Landscape Photographer of the Year winners announced article (157 comments in total)

What a lottery competitions are. It depends whether judges awake to their left or right side or they just flip a coin? I feel so demotivated to enter in competitions because I can't understand what is going on their heads, honestly...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2014 at 15:05 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On Photographing Thailand with the Nokia Lumia 1020 article (148 comments in total)

Why not at local zoo? What's the point?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2014 at 01:45 UTC as 4th comment
On Updated: Nikon releases Capture NX-D 1.0.0 software article (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

LJohnK2: - No mask function
- No blemish removal
- No CCP
- No generic clarity slider
- No, No, No,

Hey Nikon com'on up here to Canada.... we have Community College Programs that have 2nd year Co-op students that can produce better than this.

What the hell is Nikon thinking !!!....seriously Nikon just open source your ADL algorithm so real programs like Lightroom can include it and be done with this.

Nik was bought years ago and CaptureNX was updated since, so why this sudden, idiot move??

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 13:21 UTC
On Updated: Nikon releases Capture NX-D 1.0.0 software article (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

LJohnK2: - No mask function
- No blemish removal
- No CCP
- No generic clarity slider
- No, No, No,

Hey Nikon com'on up here to Canada.... we have Community College Programs that have 2nd year Co-op students that can produce better than this.

What the hell is Nikon thinking !!!....seriously Nikon just open source your ADL algorithm so real programs like Lightroom can include it and be done with this.

Capture NX2:
- Mask function... check
- Blemish removal... check
- CCP... ? I know CCCP (former Soviet Union)
- Clarity Slider... check (with nik plugin)
- Yes, yes, yes... but those idiots at Nikon killed the software

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 04:23 UTC
On Updated: Nikon releases Capture NX-D 1.0.0 software article (112 comments in total)

While Canon enhances their RAW converter software, Nikon replaces CaptureNX with this short featured piece of crap. Did they bother to listen to their clients when this came as a Beta? I have some ideas where you can shove this, Nikon...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 00:26 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

nycgazelle: Jesus Christ People! I can't believe all the stupid complainers about this. 9.99 is two cups of coffee a month. Life is expensive...THIS most certainly isn't. I like it because for the first time in years..I did buy photoshop at full pop once...I can have current versions and not pirate it. I feel great about giving Adobe 10 bucks a month because its an amount I don't even think about when it auto deducts. This prevents everyone who couldn't plop down X amount of dollars at once for the software to pay a modest fee and feel good about themselves and enjoy a tremendously awesome product.

I don't drink coffee...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 17:09 UTC
In reply to:

flashkube: I just want to say that once you break away from Adobe products you will love it. I suffered for years learning their stuff with disorganized training videos all over the web. Adobe staff are certainly not friendly, either, if you manage to contact them through their convoluted and awful website.

If you have a Mac get Pixelmator for only $25. Much better to use AND the training videos are well organized on their website. After using it for a month I deleted Adobe Photoshop and good riddance, too.

For Windows or Mac try OnOne Software.com Creative Photo Suite. This gem makes me smile and dance when I edit photos. Photoshop always made me grind my teeth and curse under my breath nonstop.

Enjoy!

That's because PS is becoming more and more a tool for just artists or bad photographers

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 17:06 UTC

Meanwhile, Nikon replaces Capture NX with a (not free) great piece of crap. Nice one Nikon!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 02:56 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On Adobe teases new 'Focus masks' feature article (58 comments in total)

How about a do-all-the-work-for-you feature? I could have a good night sleep while PS does it all for me.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 21:29 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

Don Kiyoti: Too many DPReview people with their noses glued to their screens, staring at pixels, or fretting about what the other brand is doing, or worrying if their new camera might have "shutter shock" or some other trivial defect. When confronted with actual photography, they know not what to do and respond with fear and derision!

May be... But I still don't see "actual" photography here. Well, my son has done similar "works" when he was 4. I'll probably post them at next year competition.

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2014 at 14:25 UTC
In reply to:

Saffron_Blaze: Better stuff finds its way at the bottom of Flickr's Explore everyday. Much better.

so is a series of my pregnant cat having a crap with all that she is eating...

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2014 at 02:32 UTC

Really, I don't care. They are garbage. They don't tell me squat. I only see a group of amateur ugly pictures. I feel sorry for anyone with great skills being surpassed by "this"

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2014 at 02:29 UTC as 29th comment | 1 reply
Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »