Richard Butler

Richard Butler

Lives in United Kingdom Seattle, United Kingdom
Works as a Reviews Editor
Joined on Nov 7, 2007

Comments

Total: 2739, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path article (1347 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheEulerID: It's simply untrue that FF focal lengths aren't useful on APS-C. Firstly, the so called "classic" focal lengths are semi-arbitrary anyway. OK, a standard lens might approximate to a human field of view, but mostly it's a bit arbitrary. After all, who uses zooms only at what are recognised as "classic" prime focal lengths.

A 50mm lens still makes a decent portrait lens on an APS-C for instance. I you want a slight flatter perspective on the face, stand back a little and crop. (Perspective is defined only by camera/subject distance).

A 35mm prime provides for a useful WA on APS-C. A 70-200mm f2.8 works very well on an APS-C in my experience.

Yes, might want some special APS-C lenses (especially at the wide end), but only 2 of my 9 lenses are APS-C specific. Those APS-C lenses are still useful on FF when you want something more compact to carry as you can always work in crop mode.

My point is that even the focal lengths that are useful on both are useful for different things.

One of the few that serves roughly the same function on both systems is a 35mm. It's slightly longer than normal on APS-C and it's slightly wider than normal on full frame. But if you really like it on one system, you're likely to be disappointed on the other (you'd be better off selling it and buying a 50mm when you move to full frame, if you really liked the way it behaved on APS-C).

I'm not saying only buy APS-C specific lenses, but I am saying: buy the focal lengths you want for the camera you have - don't mess about 'investing' in a compromise (and all sorts of cropping) based on a long-term target.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 18:29 UTC
On Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path article (1347 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sir Nick of High Point: I'm begining to dislike the term "Full Frame" Every system is full frame if it uses the full sensor area. Can we please use 35mm, or 135 format instead? Let's just all agree on that right now, thanks ;)

I'd written a paragraph on this subject originally but I took it out because it was too much of a diversion from my main point.

The name full frame certainly contributes to the perception that it's *the* definitive format - which as any medium- or large-format shooter will tell you, is not true. However, it's a widely used and understood term, so to a degree we're stuck with it.

Ironically the name only came about with the advent of smaller sensors, which all ended up being discussed in terms of 35mm-equivalents. And this was necessary, since I'd wager that even the majority of experienced photographers wouldn't be able to visualise what a 6mm lens on a 1/2.3"-type sensor would give.

And hence it's become the *de facto* reference point. And, frankly, the phrase 'equivalent to a 35mm lens on a full frame camera' is easier to make sense of than 'equivalent to a 35mm lens on a 35mm camera.'

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 18:21 UTC
In reply to:

Melancholic Troll: High-end camera with no top LCD screen?

I agree - I've changed the story.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2015 at 18:45 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Lens pics are broken. Invalid jpegs

That should be fixed (though I'm not sure what caused it).

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2015 at 18:43 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

spthealien: Wow. No a5100. DPReview...what happened to you?

We put it in the [next category up](http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6428641287/mid-range-mirrorless-camera-roundup), though it's easy to make strong arguments for putting it in either group.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 18:12 UTC
On Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review preview (501 comments in total)
In reply to:

wine540: I respectfully disagree. I too have an unhealthy knowledge of Olympus menus having survived ownership of the an OM-D EM-5 and P5. Customizing this camera is child's play for me. I've used it for birding trips, scenics and casual Grandpa photography. What concerns me is that the sensor behaves as well or better than the EM-1. It is so easy to use and carry around. Pictures using the unlikely combination of camera+ Pany/Leica 25 mm are scary good. As a second camera of a MFT system user this is the best PEN yet!

It sounds like we agree on more than we disagree on.

My point was that it's a really good camera *if* you're familiar enough with Olympus menus to get the best out of it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 00:10 UTC
On Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review preview (501 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dayd3: I don't get it why shooting experience is mostly about not so good default settings? I mean, camera is very customizable and can be used as quickly and in the same way as DLSR if user takes some time to change default behavior in a menus.

Because the default settings are much further away from being photographer-optimized than most DSLRs, and because it's harder to customize than most other cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 00:05 UTC
On Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review preview (501 comments in total)
In reply to:

BobFoster: However, the camera is fundamentally a Pen version of the E-M10 (something other commentators have rightly pointed out above). Other review websites have rated the camera quite highly. Maybe these have taken the trouble to look past the ‘girly’ advertizing into the actual photographic merits of the camera and come up with a more accurate evaluation than this review.

Where in the article do you think we've criticised the 'photographic merits' of the camera?

What I thought I'd written was that it's a really capable camera but that (unlike the E-M10) it's pretty obscure how to get the most out of it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2014 at 00:01 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

G-D: DPR, I think you should add some comment about why you left out so many other equally good and comparable camera's, like all those mentioned by many here in earlier comments. What a weird lineup!

I've replied to this on the other roundup where we're having a parallel conversation.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 01:05 UTC
On Enthusiast mirrorless camera roundup (2014) article (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

quezra: The basic problem is DPR are cherry picking when they use the manufacturer's classification (e.g. putting the Nikon 1 V3 here), and when they choose to ignore it (no A6000 or A7 here).

Same problem in the entry-level mirrorless category. Several cheap cameras are missing there (E-PL7, A5000), yet they randomly add in Fuji offerings which are far more expensive than most of that category.

And ironically, spec-for-spec, the X-M/A1 are very similar to the Nikon 1 V3, but placed at opposite ends of the mirrorless category.

If we moved the a5100 down it'd be in the same group as the a3000, so they'd be no more spread out.

However, I hadn't realised the a5100 was being sold quite *that* cheap. And, while price isn't the sole factor, I'll bring it up for discussion tomorrow.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 01:01 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zeisschen: Endless click producing roundups. Seriously, who cares? These lists simply made Dpreview less credible to me...

We're constantly criticised for not actually helping people to decide which camera to buy. This is our attempt.

We've used every one of these cameras and so are trying to offer our insight based on that (often extensive) usage.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 00:07 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

Impulses: Uhh, no MFT cameras? I'm guessing they were left out because no new entry level bodies were released this year... Could've swore I remember MFT (GF6 or a PEN) being included in a similar roundup last year. At the same time tho, the A3000 and others here were also 2013 releases, and you can get a mid to high end GX7 or E-M10 for the price of the X-M1...

BarnET - The E-PL7 *is* here and has been for several hours now. The PL7 and GM1 were borderline cases and, in response to reader feedback, we moved them.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 23:26 UTC
On High-end pocketable compacts roundup (2014) article (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I know I am not the only one that cares about these cameras. Something must be wrong or there would be more comments. Am I the only one that can see this article?

Dpreview can you look into this?

A system glitch means that a lot of the comments for this article got associated with the 2013 roundup, so the small number of comments reflects only one day's traffic on a day when we've not directed anyone towards the article.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 22:26 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

Impulses: Uhh, no MFT cameras? I'm guessing they were left out because no new entry level bodies were released this year... Could've swore I remember MFT (GF6 or a PEN) being included in a similar roundup last year. At the same time tho, the A3000 and others here were also 2013 releases, and you can get a mid to high end GX7 or E-M10 for the price of the X-M1...

@Impulses - I agree with you about the GM1 and we've now moved it into this category.

At the moment we've not included any camera in mutliple groups (partly because, once you add one borderline case, you shift the border and have to add another one...), mainly to make sure these don't end up being infinitely long.

The long-term plan is to make the whole thing more flexible, so that there are different roundups based on different methods of selection (size/price/capability), but we haven't had the time to do that, yet.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 22:18 UTC
On Enthusiast mirrorless camera roundup (2014) article (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

quezra: The basic problem is DPR are cherry picking when they use the manufacturer's classification (e.g. putting the Nikon 1 V3 here), and when they choose to ignore it (no A6000 or A7 here).

Same problem in the entry-level mirrorless category. Several cheap cameras are missing there (E-PL7, A5000), yet they randomly add in Fuji offerings which are far more expensive than most of that category.

And ironically, spec-for-spec, the X-M/A1 are very similar to the Nikon 1 V3, but placed at opposite ends of the mirrorless category.

quezra - there's no perfect way to categorise cameras. We take into account the MSRP, the manufacturers' stated intentions and our own judgement based on how the camera handles and the features it offers. Your examples are good ones in that they're the borderline cameras that are hardest to categorise.

The E-PL7 has been moved to entry-level because its street price seems a lot lower than the MSRP (also the PL5 ended up mid level last year because there was a PEN Mini model below it).

The a5000 is almost certainly replaced by the a5100, which is *just* about mid-level.

Finally, in the same way the a6000 dominates the mid-range class by being so competitively priced, the V3's price pushes it into the enthusiast class, where it's rather out-gunned.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 19:55 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

dark goob: Wow where's Olympus??? Really, DPREVIEW?

Fail!

Jorginho - we can never be 100% sure but the fact that the PM2's co-launched sister model was replaced at Photokina this year strongly suggests that if the PM2 hasn't yet ceased production, it will do within the lifetime of this article.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 19:01 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

Impulses: Uhh, no MFT cameras? I'm guessing they were left out because no new entry level bodies were released this year... Could've swore I remember MFT (GF6 or a PEN) being included in a similar roundup last year. At the same time tho, the A3000 and others here were also 2013 releases, and you can get a mid to high end GX7 or E-M10 for the price of the X-M1...

I hate to spoil dark goob's conspiracy theory with anything so crude as facts, but we included a whole host of Micro Four Thirds cameras in the [Mid-Range Roundup](http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6428641287/mid-range-mirrorless-camera-roundup) we published a few weeks ago. A Micro Four Thirds camera was one of our recommendations, as it happens.

The E-PL7 and GM1 were both borderline as to whether they should be included in the entry-level or mid-level class. We chose to put them in the one that was going to be published first. However, having seen the comments about the price level they're being sold at (which wasn't clear when we planned these pieces), we're going to discuss moving them into this class.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 18:51 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

G-D: DPR, I think you should add some comment about why you left out so many other equally good and comparable camera's, like all those mentioned by many here in earlier comments. What a weird lineup!

If you look across all the roundups we've published in the past month, you should find just about every model that's likely to still be on the market after Christmas.

If you want to read about older models (such as the a5000) you can find it in [last year's roundup](http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7802516432/mid-range-mirrorless-camera-roundup-2013).

The E-PL7 and GM1 were borderline cases and are currently in the mid-level roundup, published a few weeks ago. We'll discuss moving them down to this group (especially since the GM1's price has been reduced so much).

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 18:45 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) article (134 comments in total)
In reply to:

KKJohn: Just to make a point re the people likely to buy these cameras. I'm a retired photographer who used to have a Nikon system with several bodies and 50 lbs of lenses. After I retired I wanted something light, reasonably priced but with good quality. I started off with the Lumix LX3, then the Fuji X10. My friendly camera store had some good deals on the XA1 with both kit lenses (16-50 & 50-230). I also splurged on the 35/1.4 lens. With all 3 lenses the total came to less than what an XT1 body would cost. For the difference in quality and features, which IMHO is not sufficiently great, I couldn't be more pleased with the XA1.
So the fact that you label these cameras for photography beginners and those who will upgrade to DSLRs is unkind to us old timers who are just the opposite, trying to down size from the monster DSLRs but still want quality and don't have to satisfy finicky customers, only our family and friends who have found the quality of my XA1 output to be just fine thank you.

KKJohn - We've only put the X-A1 and X-M1 in this group because they're the lowest-cost entries into the X-mount system. We also highlight them as being the models with most appeal here to those users who want to take control over their cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 17:59 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1238 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karen Casebeer: I've been looking forward to this review and it seems mostly excellent. However, I noticed the new 7D2 got an 84% and a Silver Award, but the 70D got 83%, and a Gold award. I'm not sure what the relationship is between percentage and whether a camera body gets a Silver or Gold award.

AbrasiveReducer - the problem is the alternative is to do away with groups, which suddenly means that compacts score ~30% and mid-level DSLRs score ~50-60% because they're just not Nikon D810s.

Categorising is awkward around the borders between classes, but on the whole it gives more readily comprehensible results.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 01:52 UTC
Total: 2739, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »