Jono Slack

Jono Slack

Lives in United Kingdom Diss, Norfolk, United Kingdom
Works as a Software Designer
Has a website at http://www.slack.co.uk
Joined on Nov 8, 2000
About me:

Just this guy you know

Comments

Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12
In reply to:

Jono Slack: Please Note
This is NOT just Photos - it's the CoreFoundation RAW processing in Yosemite 10.10.3 and 10.10.4 which means that it does the same with Aperture Libraries.

Also worth mentioning that it was pointed out here: http://www.slack.co.uk/2015/Elliott.html
at the end of April when the camera was launched.

Apple are on the case - and hopefully it'll be fixed soon, in the meantime if you have this problem, the only solution is to delete the Leica DNG files from the hard drive - in which case the Library will load again.

Steve (and everyone)
It's ONLY a problem in 10.10.3 and above.
10.10.2 is fine

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

falconeyes: The real message here is that a crash of the Photos app can corrupt the library.

That should never happen with a well designed app (hint: transactional safety).

I think that's a real advantage with LR: not only did I never see a corrupted library after a LR crash (I've seen quite a few after fresh major releases). But because it is an SQLite database file, it could be repaired using SQLite tools. And then, LR really cares to keep backups of that file (of course, Time Machine does the same).

To understand how serious this is: Just imagine an application crash would leave your file system emptied ...

It is hard to accept Apple released such a poorly designed piece of software. Apple seems to have changed a lot recently.

Iliah
Whether the badly formed exif tags cause the crash or not is not really the point - it should not crash.

What isn't mentioned is that the problem is in Apple CoreFoundation RAW support - so it's also the case with Aperture - as you say, libraries are not destroyed - but they will not reload until the DNG files are deleted.

I discovered this back in January (and of course reported it). It's pretty scary when your 90,000 image Aperture library simply crashes on loading - and so it's important that Leica have made the directive (but sad that they didn't include mention of Aperture).

It appears that Apple are on the case - so hopefully there will be a quick resolution. . .

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2015 at 23:23 UTC
In reply to:

onlooker: If anyone is disgusted with Monochrome now, I will take it off your hands. I have not been good and am willing to suffer as penance.

:)
But seriously, this is not Leica's fault - it's Apple's fault, and they've known about it since January without actually doing anything about it . . . and it's also relevant to Aperture libraries with Yosemite 10.10.3 and 10.10.4

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2015 at 23:17 UTC
In reply to:

Thoughts R Us: How many people who buy a Monochrom are going to use the Photos app anyway? It's oriented towards very basic consumers. I would imagine the customer base for the Monochrom would be using something like Lightroom.

It also relates to Aperture - careful!

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2015 at 23:00 UTC

Please Note
This is NOT just Photos - it's the CoreFoundation RAW processing in Yosemite 10.10.3 and 10.10.4 which means that it does the same with Aperture Libraries.

Also worth mentioning that it was pointed out here: http://www.slack.co.uk/2015/Elliott.html
at the end of April when the camera was launched.

Apple are on the case - and hopefully it'll be fixed soon, in the meantime if you have this problem, the only solution is to delete the Leica DNG files from the hard drive - in which case the Library will load again.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2015 at 22:59 UTC as 27th comment | 3 replies

One thing I can say is that the RAW files are NOT DNG (but RWL files - same as the LX100)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 07:34 UTC as 3rd comment
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2250 comments in total)
In reply to:

ProfHankD: The interesting thing is the lack of comments about the griplessness of this camera. I'm sure it feels nice to touch, but doesn't it proceed to slide out of your hand when you try to pick it up?

Well, I actually used the camera for 3 months with no strap (it wasn't ready). and no, it doesn't slip out of your hands, even with a large R lens attached

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 09:03 UTC
In reply to:

NoTx: Hey, does anyone know if the R-Adapter automates the aperture setting, or is it all stop down? Hoping it can make use of the lenses as they were designed.

Hi There
You don't need stop down metering with a mirror-less camera. Set the aperture you want to use, and the EVF gains up to show you the correct depth of field / metering etc. It's much more elegant than stop down metering, and works really well using 3rd party lenses and adapters on other mirrorless systems.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 08:07 UTC
On Apple releases Aperture v3.3 with iPhoto integration article (41 comments in total)

Well - I was horrified at first - my personal jury is still out on the grey icons, but I''m beginning to like them.
On the other hand, my impression is that it's faster - I've not had any hangs (even with my 50,000 + library. the new auto enhance button is cool.
Removing the RAW brick from the default is questionable, but it's only the work of 2 minutes to put it back in the default for good.
I've recently gone back to Aperture after 5 months working with Lightroom 4 - I wondered whether it would prompt me to make the big move to Lightroom, but quite the contrary - the clone tool, the cataloguing, the brush based adjustments, the printing . . . . . and now Lightroom 4 is out the speed - Aperture wins at every level. I just wish they'd get their camera updates in a bit more quickly!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2012 at 08:40 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On Leica M-Monochrom preview (451 comments in total)

Hi There Richard
Thank you - What a fine preview. It's nicely written, entertaining and seems to me to get to the heart of the matter.
all the best
Jonathan Slack

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2012 at 00:03 UTC as 60th comment
On Leica M9 comparison shots added to dpreview database article (149 comments in total)
In reply to:

TrojMacReady: Why has the A77 been removed from the tool?
Reshot with a later firmware?

Perhaps they were taken away so that they could be reshot with the focus a bit close to the front (only the queen card was truly in focus with the old shots).

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:31 UTC
On Leica M9 comparison shots added to dpreview database article (149 comments in total)
In reply to:

PB123456: very bad work. Look at Queens card. It is in focus others not. Look at Mickey - out of focus others OK. Very unprofessional or .....

HI There
I must say, it seems to me that varying focus points make comparisons pretty difficult - as you say, this is focused much further back than some of the other cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:30 UTC
Total: 12, showing: 1 – 12