rainman1978

rainman1978

Joined on Dec 28, 2011

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6

Fuji should have made a wider converter (24mm equivalent), I think 350 is expensive for a 0.8X converter.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2012 at 02:39 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

Jmmg: btw, maybe just my humble observation, it seem like the new sensor is more noisier than the old one an scarify more detail...is that just me?

I can't tell which is noisier.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2012 at 14:11 UTC
On 2012 Pulitzer Prize photography winners announced news story (76 comments in total)

I read the work, it was really good and heart touching!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2012 at 05:49 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

rainman1978: It really depends on what you shoot and your tolerance level for orbs.

It's definitely a goner for night shoot.

Those were some test shots take at ISO100 15secs.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073711/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074081/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073947/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074267/in/photostream

My point is why should I be accepting the flaw when clearly its Fujifilm's fault?

Wouldn't a sensor replacement sounds reasonable?

Anyway I applaud all ranters and DPR for making the threads alive, this should caution all unawared buyers to buy at their own risk.

Unfortunately the orbs look like bad photoshopping.

Nope, that will be like saying DPR making up the same story.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2012 at 15:49 UTC

It really depends on what you shoot and your tolerance level for orbs.

It's definitely a goner for night shoot.

Those were some test shots take at ISO100 15secs.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073711/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074081/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759073947/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11759864@N05/6759074267/in/photostream

My point is why should I be accepting the flaw when clearly its Fujifilm's fault?

Wouldn't a sensor replacement sounds reasonable?

Anyway I applaud all ranters and DPR for making the threads alive, this should caution all unawared buyers to buy at their own risk.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2012 at 15:14 UTC as 17th comment | 5 replies
On Fujifilm X10 firmware: Appears not to fix 'white orbs' news story (601 comments in total)

OMG its a flagship compact.

White flag I supposed.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 06:44 UTC as 26th comment
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6