D1N0

D1N0

Lives in Netherlands Groningen, Netherlands
Joined on May 31, 2007

Comments

Total: 909, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

onlooker: DXOMark's claimed 1.5 EV dynamic range advantage of A7S over 5DIII does not seem to be reflected in this test. If anything, it appears the other way around.

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A7S-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III___949_795

Just try the lightroom noise reduction on both iso 25.600 pics and see what the result is. A7S gives an much cleaner image.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 17:07 UTC
In reply to:

David J B.: I've taken better photos through my car window.

because you were at the bikini carwash?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 16:34 UTC
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: So much more detail in the Canon image; Canon is the winner here at high ISO.

You are talking about the Seattle Centre Arches. The lighting of those arches is different in the Canon shots. Just look at the Space Needle. The highlights hardly differ between sony and canon.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 13:57 UTC
In reply to:

ngtszhodavid: to the reviewer: why isn't the d4s review done yet.

The D4s is not really in the scope of dpreview public. It's expensive and big and heavy. It's a pro's tool. Overkill for most every amateur.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 12:52 UTC
In reply to:

eyeswideshut: I take away two impressions from this comparison:
- The Canon beats both cameras (just look at those arches in the back - or are they Klingon Birds of Prey?)
- Stay away from high ISO if at all possible. Tripod anyone?

Those arches are blown out in the sony's and not in the Canon. Not a resolution difference but dynamic range or lighting. Since nothing else is blown out more in the sony's i guess the lighting around the arches was differrent during the canon-shoot.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 12:40 UTC
In reply to:

maljo@inreach.com: So much more detail in the Canon image; Canon is the winner here at high ISO.

ehm... No

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 11:20 UTC

Should have put de Nikon Df in there as it is the camera that approaches the iso spec of the a7s (or the D4, but that' s a different price class.)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 11:17 UTC as 150th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

D1N0: 9,99 for US 17,60 for europeans.

I am talking about Euro's €12,99 is $17,60 edit it's 12,29 so $ 16,75 (still much more).

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2014 at 10:23 UTC

9,99 for US 17,60 for europeans.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 21:59 UTC as 39th comment | 9 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

pgphoto_ca: Be carefull....it's not a f2.8-f4 with this sensor (2.7x crop)....it's f5.6-f8 or more.......the crop factor need also to be apply to the aperture :)

A real 400mm f4...is much bigger ! :)

you can send a pm you know.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 11:45 UTC

Needs different camera for each focal length. great idea to sell more camera's

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 05:44 UTC as 118th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ovatab: Flexible sensor with variable curvature for interchangeable lens cameras?

you could do that easily over 1 axis. 2 would problematic

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 05:34 UTC
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (234 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: It might have been interesting to see how well the Nikon 1 AW1 performed against these cameras. Compared to the four cameras reviewed, the Nikon 1 has a "huge sensor."

The aperture of the TG-2 is about 4mm2 At F2, the aperture of the AW1 is about 7.75mm2 at F3.5. Almost twice as much light gets through.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 18:42 UTC
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (234 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: It might have been interesting to see how well the Nikon 1 AW1 performed against these cameras. Compared to the four cameras reviewed, the Nikon 1 has a "huge sensor."

@mike fl aperture area is not an absolute value. It's relative to focal length. focal length/aperture is aperture diameter. Bigger sensors have longer focal length's and consequently larger aperture diameters.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 17:17 UTC
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (234 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rod McD: I'm getting deja vu......... Why can't at least one camera manufacturer offer a decent WP camera? There seems to be an assumption inherent in these designs that outdoors types aren't interested in IQ or camera controls. The alternative of DSLRs in housings are simply impractical for water sports, climbing, caving, skiing and so on. And the housings are often more expensive than the camera...... Surely there it would be feasible to offer something in between - a decent size sensor (1", APSC?) a fixed high quality zoom lens, raw and reasonable ergonomics?

Nikon 1 AW1

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 13:30 UTC
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (234 comments in total)

Not much happening is this market. You might as well have put last years model from Panasonic an Sony in ass well. Fuji also has one XP70. I don't see much news from Samsung and Casio though. Manufacturers should make more of the video function of these camera's otherwise they will be shot out off the water by actioncams.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 12:14 UTC as 64th comment
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (234 comments in total)
In reply to:

thx1138: This will be a race to the bottom and hopefully literally and not metaphorically. Send them all to Davy Jones' locker I say!

I reckon you should have thrown in the Nikon AW1 as a reference just to see how the tiny sensored jpg only monstrosities compare, not that the AW1 is without issues.

Sony needs to make an UW version of the RX100III.

I'd get a waterproof keyboard first.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:55 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Aluminum lenses would look better in this.

Gravitational lenses would also be cool. You could really suck in your subject.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2014 at 16:24 UTC

Aluminum lenses would look better in this.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 14:54 UTC as 53rd comment | 6 replies

Beavis and Butthead should comment this video.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 19:28 UTC as 29th comment | 3 replies
Total: 909, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »