specs page is missing.
D1N0: Great Job Canon. Now stick in a Sony sensor.
noise.... Color reprodoction? O please Canon overcooks it's files.
Great Job Canon. Now stick in a Sony sensor.
On paper this is a great camera. It all depends on the execution though. You cannot just throw together a bunch of specs en expect it to be a great camera. I'll await the reviews before passing judgement. Fuji and Olympus/Pana better watch out for this one and Sony has yet to make a camera in this class (mirrorless with centered evf, (A3000 doesn't count, too cheap ass. Of course the is the A7 but that isn't cropped).
At 15fps you could almost make full res video with it ;)
D1N0: This is probably what de D600 should have been in the first place.
I forgot about the df.....
This is probably what de D600 should have been in the first place.
Karl Gnter Wnsch: If the "Sport" version is geared at the professionals which do not care that much about weight, why isn't it at least f/5.6? As f/6.3 they are missing the limit of the focusing systems - and since that is a physical limit the focusing on almost all DSLR will be compromized and not function as advertised and guaranteed by the manufacturers!
The D750 AF has the following specs:Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500 II autofocus sensor module with TTL phase detection, fine-tuning, 51 focus points (including 15 cross-type sensors; f/8 supported by 11 sensors), and AF-assist illuminator (range approx. 0.5 to 3 m/1 ft 8 in. to 9 ft 10 in.)
So it will work up to F8. Probably F11 with the center point. Not that it is a good idea to use a tc on a superzoom anyway, but it is not impossible.
with the -3 ev focussing on the D750 it should not be a problem.
Ricoh goes pro ;)
D1N0: Improve bokeh? Use your clarity slider on it.
Adjustment brush auto mask ;)
Improve bokeh? Use your clarity slider on it.
mike kobal: those Otus lenses would make so much more sense on mirrorless cameras with high def EVF, manual focusing one of these properly through the OVF - even on the best DSLR's - is going to be quite frustratingnot a problem for the lucky ones who actually can afford to buy one of these, they can surely afford to hire the best focus puller in the world ;) and a second shooter using an af lens as back up, just in case :)))
They are much to big and heavy for mirrorless.
No quartz no fluorite? Useless ;)
Sannaborjeson: That is weird.
They show only 3000x2000px samples on their flickr and all the samples are terribly over-sharped. https://www.flickr.com/photos/carlzeisslenses/14833959224/
And for some reason CZ bans people from commenting or asking questions on their photo samples.
Flickr sharpens when it resizes.
I have everything I need for this except a pregnant woman. Where to get one?
D1N0: The K-01* is a great camera. Just misunderstood :p
*DPReview writers wouldn't need an asterisk when they would just write accurate information in the first place.
"Pentax's one and only enthusiast mirrorless interchangeable lens camera"
The K-01* is a great camera. Just misunderstood :p
pcblade: Why not just buy a mirrorless camera ?
Why do I feel like the invasion of the body snatchers is happing.
Next to that bottom anything looks good.