D1N0

D1N0

Lives in Mali Nowhere, Mali
Joined on May 31, 2007

Comments

Total: 1202, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

D1N0: They have a "We are Canon" attitude. So you don't have a decent mirrorless line? We are Canon! So you still suck at high ISO? "We are Canon!" When we make it, they will Buy.

That's why there is a D750 P

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 20:48 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: They have a "We are Canon" attitude. So you don't have a decent mirrorless line? We are Canon! So you still suck at high ISO? "We are Canon!" When we make it, they will Buy.

Comparing 22mp to 36? Come on. The 5D MK III sucks less than the aps-c models but Nikon still trounces it.
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III___975_795

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 20:44 UTC

They have a "We are Canon" attitude. So you don't have a decent mirrorless line? We are Canon! So you still suck at high ISO? "We are Canon!" When we make it, they will Buy.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 19:49 UTC as 142nd comment | 13 replies
On Flasher smartphone flash launched on Kickstarter post (73 comments in total)

Google images knows what a flasher is...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 21:55 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

D1N0: Ricoh now has it's full attention on the full frame DSLR. They don't have the resources to also develop a FF Mirrorless beside that. Better do one thing right than two things half baked.

The imaging division is not large. They won't just throw a shitload of money at it. They are developing in a sensible way.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 10:44 UTC

Ricoh now has it's full attention on the full frame DSLR. They don't have the resources to also develop a FF Mirrorless beside that. Better do one thing right than two things half baked.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 8, 2015 at 13:20 UTC as 83rd comment | 3 replies
On 06_Dan00118_f1.4 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (17 comments in total)
In reply to:

cinemascope: I think this is a good example of too much DOF. To me it looks like her face was photoshopped into an out of focus body, almost South Park like... Creamy background nonetheless, but an easy one to render like ruicarv79 has said...

I think you mean to little DOF

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2015 at 18:26 UTC

The Nikon totally missed the window washer guy

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 19:06 UTC as 103rd comment
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

You are not reading what I am saying aman74 but don't argue with me. I hate arguing with idiots.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 11:49 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

Well if you cannot understand I cannot refute and you are doomed to remain in your cave of ignorance.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 20:51 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

yes thank you for showing how much of an ass you are even more.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 20:00 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

I don't think I will explain myself again to you as it is clearly your purpose to attack my person an not discus this in a reasonable manner. For clarification, just read my earlier comments and stop alluding stupidity.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 18:32 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

You have yet to falsify anything I have said mister. The advantage of mirror less is less when you have to make bigger lenses or when wide-angle becomes more difficult because the lens is so close to the sensor. A longer flange might be a good trade off especially when you are going to put an extruding grip on it anyway. Unlike with dslrs you also have the option to extend the lens into the body because of no mirror. Thus it gives you more flexibility in lens design. Also i have not used the word disadvantage. You are attacking my points with value judgements and not facts.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 17:34 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

Sigh.. where is the advantage gone when your lenses are sitting on tubes. You might as well have stayed with slr. But you want to be right so keep op saying silly stuf please.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 17:06 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

Yes it does. The angle at which the light hits the sensor is directly dependent on how close the back element is to the sensor and the angle of the lens.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 14:29 UTC
In reply to:

D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

The advantage is you increase the angle to the sensor, eliminating angular vignettiing. There are plenty retrofocus designs and since there is no mirror you can also move the back element inside. Also your standard primes (35mm 50mm) will become more compact.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 13:06 UTC

Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 12:35 UTC as 49th comment | 21 replies
On Nikon D7200 First Impressions Review preview (1113 comments in total)

Nikon isn't going anywhere in aps-c. A small iteration, ironing out some of the cripplers from the D7100. They should choose. Is this a top range consumer dslr? Then put on an articulated screen. Is it a pro-level aps-c? Then make it a workhorse with 10fps and a killer shutterlife, leave out the scene mode crap and focus on build quality and operation and handling.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 13:38 UTC as 211th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Geekapoo: Konost? What is a Konost? Better be good as this sector is going to be incredibly competitive over the next couple of years..

What has Jesus gotta do with it?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 UTC
In reply to:

Geekapoo: Konost? What is a Konost? Better be good as this sector is going to be incredibly competitive over the next couple of years..

They made it up. It sounds good for hipsters.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2015 at 22:41 UTC
Total: 1202, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »