D1N0

D1N0

Lives in Netherlands Groningen, Netherlands
Joined on May 31, 2007

Comments

Total: 974, showing: 341 – 360
« First‹ Previous1617181920Next ›Last »
On Nikon Df Review preview (1613 comments in total)

Clearly Nikon wants everybody to buy a D800. A D800 functionality body with d600 size with a 24mp kick ass sensor is what Nikon should have made. Use a scaled down version for the 24mp aps-c sensor and the longed for D400 is also a fact.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 14:58 UTC as 257th comment | 7 replies
On Have Your Say: Best DSLR / SLT of 2013 article (339 comments in total)

Phew.. Made it to the comments but forgot what I was going to say....

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 23:08 UTC as 106th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

jst13: Why no Fuji X-E2

They didn't feel like it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 19:28 UTC
On Fujifilm announces XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS wideangle zoom article (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

Xentinus: Looks pretty but too big for Fuji x system cameras.

The is an external Grip available for Fuji http://static.bhphoto.com/images/images500x500/849431.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 14:16 UTC
In reply to:

CanonKen: Will there be an Adobe profile?

The point of this lens are de specific optical distortions. You want to correct them? Don't buy the lens.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 14:30 UTC
In reply to:

DBHH: As you drop a pile of cash on this thing please remember that they used to make lenses like this in the 1800's because THEY COULDN'T MAKE BETTER LENSES AT THAT TIME! If the original designer of this 19th century optic was able to make a lens that was as good as one on an iPhone this design would have ended up in his antique garbage bin.

YOU! have no sense of romance whatsoever!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 14:27 UTC

m42 please

Direct link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 14:26 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon Df real-world samples gallery article (224 comments in total)

low light champ (just)

http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Nikon-Df-review-New-low-light-champion/Nikon-Df-sensor-performance-Best-Low-Light-ISO-score

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 15:05 UTC as 28th comment | 17 replies

This must be a sabotage act and not a compatibility issue. Nikon firmware actively checking whether there is a third party batterie being used and refusing to operate. They'll probably say it is to protect the user from damaged camera's and they are just doing you a favour.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 13:30 UTC as 71st comment

So the Chinese government decided they would rather have Nikon making J1's in China than in Thailand and told Sakar to make a less obvious rip off.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 22:13 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

Frank_BR: Nano coating? Oh, no, another manufacturer who tries to tell other version of the same old fairy tale about lens coating!

It all started in the '60s when Asahi Pentax created a hype with SMC (Super Multi-Coating). Since then, the world has had to hear all this blah blah blah about the magical qualities of the various types of coating used in photographic lenses.

Some acronyms created since then by the fertile imagination of the lens manufacturers:
SMC Pentax
EBC: Fuji
T*: Zeiss
MC: Pentacon, CZJ, Tokina
SSC: Canon
C: Nikon
N: Nikon
SHMC: Hoya
UMC: Samyang
VMC: Vivitar

And RMC Tokina ;)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 14:40 UTC
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)

Well the 100D based on the same chip got a gold award from dpreview. It is fast enough. It's just not an enthusiast camera, because it lacks physical controls (despite touch screen). Canon wants to profit from the mirror less market while not hurting their dslr business. They don't want people replacing their rebels for a mirror less, but they don't want to miss out on in either.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 13:39 UTC as 188th comment
On Camera roundups 2013: What to buy and why article (285 comments in total)
In reply to:

sono1mito: mah,affermare che le ultime telecamere rappresentano un" grande passo avanti rispetto a 2 anni fa" mi sembra esagerato,certo qualche dettaglio è stato migliorato ma non tanto.Ognuno di noi penso che anche con una camera "vecchia" scatta ottime foto senza inseguire le ultime novità.
Ciao

Ik denk niet dat hier veel mensen Italiaans verstaan knakker.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2013 at 19:05 UTC
In reply to:

JustDavid: and the Pentax Q?

the q is much more than that

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2013 at 16:54 UTC

Google Glass

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2013 at 13:25 UTC as 16th comment
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: Too bad it doesn't have a Full frame sensor.

@(1/4)2doom I will. It's just not there yet :p

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 18:41 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: Too bad it doesn't have a Full frame sensor.

I would be bitching when everybody was acting like the Toyota Yaris is an SUV.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2013 at 18:38 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: Too bad it doesn't have a Full frame sensor.

I want a big sensor because full frame is closer to the perceived 3d of the human eye. It looks more real to me.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2013 at 14:00 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: Too bad it doesn't have a Full frame sensor.

even aps-c would have been better

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2013 at 12:45 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)

Too bad it doesn't have a Full frame sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2013 at 12:42 UTC as 87th comment | 21 replies
Total: 974, showing: 341 – 360
« First‹ Previous1617181920Next ›Last »