2eyesee: Can someone please explain to me why people find these retro designs appealing? Am I just not 'old school' enough (I got into photography about 15 years ago)?
Because the alternative is a rounded hunk of plastic
With aps-c moving to 24mp and even 28, 16 is just not going to cut it anymore. Eventually m43 will be a niche for street photographers who don't crop.
Most photographed real estate in the Netherlands made an appearance again.
D1N0: Where's Pentax you bunch of Hipsters!
Where's Pentax you bunch of Hipsters!
Tapper123: Perhaps the metallic awards system should be done away with? It just leads to contention. Seems the numerical scores are enough, not to mention the conclusion text, for people looking for a summation.
Personally I thought this was a fair review, and I own an EM5 II and enjoy it. Pair it with some really good lenses and it's as good as almost anything except for perhaps some extreme situations where a 35mm sensor has an advantage. I see it as a great all-arounder, a camera that does everything reasonably well, with world class IS, solid build and weather resistance. If you can't get a good image from this camera paired with a good lens, then I suspect the problem is not the camera.
Anyway, gold, silver -- it doesn't matter. It's a great camera, capable of great images, and has a remarkable lens selection. Enjoy it.
Yeah let's make it crystalline
Diamond, Ruby and Sapphire..
So I can just buy a bag instead of a mirror less.
Looks like he is sucking out spinal fluid.
D1N0: They have a "We are Canon" attitude. So you don't have a decent mirrorless line? We are Canon! So you still suck at high ISO? "We are Canon!" When we make it, they will Buy.
That's why there is a D750 P
Comparing 22mp to 36? Come on. The 5D MK III sucks less than the aps-c models but Nikon still trounces it.http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III___975_795
They have a "We are Canon" attitude. So you don't have a decent mirrorless line? We are Canon! So you still suck at high ISO? "We are Canon!" When we make it, they will Buy.
Google images knows what a flasher is...
D1N0: Ricoh now has it's full attention on the full frame DSLR. They don't have the resources to also develop a FF Mirrorless beside that. Better do one thing right than two things half baked.
The imaging division is not large. They won't just throw a shitload of money at it. They are developing in a sensible way.
Ricoh now has it's full attention on the full frame DSLR. They don't have the resources to also develop a FF Mirrorless beside that. Better do one thing right than two things half baked.
cinemascope: I think this is a good example of too much DOF. To me it looks like her face was photoshopped into an out of focus body, almost South Park like... Creamy background nonetheless, but an easy one to render like ruicarv79 has said...
I think you mean to little DOF
The Nikon totally missed the window washer guy
D1N0: Sony should bring out a compact 18mm super wide, which kan make optimal use of the short flange (but it is probably difficult due to angular vignetting) A FF mirrorless should problay have a somewhat wider flange distance, like 35mm.
You are not reading what I am saying aman74 but don't argue with me. I hate arguing with idiots.
Well if you cannot understand I cannot refute and you are doomed to remain in your cave of ignorance.
yes thank you for showing how much of an ass you are even more.
I don't think I will explain myself again to you as it is clearly your purpose to attack my person an not discus this in a reasonable manner. For clarification, just read my earlier comments and stop alluding stupidity.