dash2k8: Outsell? I actually believe it. Mirrorless will be more appealing to the masses. Ma's and pa's looking for simple family photos will prefer the smaller, lighter and more portable options. And honestly, mirrorless is closing the performance gap to make it good enough for most consumers. Pros will never outnumber amateurs so I don't see why people don't think mirrorless will outsell DSLRs. I also don't understand why ppl are upset at this eventuality.
I understand that mirrorless cameras (potentially) offer two advantages over DSLRs -- (1) lenses, no longer needing to be retrofocus designs, can be better or cheaper, and (2) mirror slap cannot add to image degradation. You might also add a third advantage -- no noisy mirrors.
irm: What is wrong with Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, after all it is a holiday to celebrate the birth of Christ, not just have a holiday.
And? So? Nu?
Richt2000: Why can't American websites dare say "happy Christmas"?When its Holi people say happy Holi, when its Eid, people say Eid Mubarak, so we can't people say Happy Christmas?
Keep atheism out of DPReview. Booze news is OK though.
Murilo Gomes NT: It's just unbelievable that some people can complain even about a happy holidays post.
Anyway, happy holidays everyone! And guys, like someone have already said, it would be nice seeing some more lens reviews, if possible.
Want to know why civilization is going down to collapse and defeat? It's the iniquity and discord.
This will become much clearer in five or ten years.
Have a happy 12 nights of Christmas.
sandy b: Good articles here:
Bottom line? others do it too, perhaps not as, but the shots are still ruined.
Still a gold camera.
Thanks for the feedback.
A very happy 12 nights to you.
The bands of darkness that occur with the D750 is a serious enough problem to require a response from Nikon. Are photographers supposed to accept technological regression?
lera ion: Awarded posthumously!
Maybe he meant "prehumously."
James Bligh: I cannot find a word about internal reflection and shutter shock issues of D750 in this review. Please point me to it if I missed it. When dpreview never even mentions (not to say evaluate) the issues, you can no longer say dpreview review is a comprehensive review which I think is a shame. Once renowned for its objective reviews and a comprehensive source of information about camera gears I am afraid dpreview has fallen into the realm of mediocrity many review sites share. The present generation of dpreview staffs may have wasted their talent and ruined the reputation of dpreview. Phil Askey will lament over it seeing the prestige he has built up tainted.
@ helltormentorArgh, that flashing you're getting when shooting contre jour is awful. That is good reason to be annoyed.
Can you mitigate the effect with lens hoods?
davids8560: I would like to own this camera, and also some very nice lenses to go with it, too.
Yep, me too.
Wish it had more pixels, though.
TrollFree: is this going to be any good for landscapes and seascapes?
Fanboys? Hey, guy, I'm just passing the time of day. Angling for laughs, you know?
Tilted Plane: A pretty careful avoidance of Nikon (or Sony) comparisons, overall. Too bad. Head-to-head comparisons are really (!) helpful. Does this hold up next to a D750? Or even the D610? Or the similarly priced A7II? If so, when, where, under what shooting conditions?
How many enthusiasts care much for high frame rates? 10%? 40%? Does anyone have a feel for this?
Let's have the whole story about this banding business. I go in horror.
How about elephant stampedes? Will it be any good for elephant stampedes?
Is this a prison? A lunatic asylum? A government office block? The Ministry of Truth?
Sabatia: This is the camera I have been dreaming of since I started looking at m4/3s four years ago and even since I made the switch two plus years ago. Small and light with outstanding image quality. I'm a serious outdoors person, hiking, biking, xc skiing, winter mountaineering, etc. I'm also a serious(sold many framed prints and had hundreds of images published) nature photographer who just won't lug all the equipment any more. I tried the GM1, but too too often couldn't see the screen or the level line in the sun. I've also owned Canon S95 and Pana LX5 and LX7, but wasn't satisfied with the image quality. I've considered the LX100 and the RX100, but love the versatility of changing lenses, particularly since I already own a small pile of m4/3s lenses, including three primes and a macro.
Right on target.
This camera system fits my requirements like none other.
By the way, TechRadar and Imaging-Resource have reviews. They applaud the image quality.
The A6000 is not a DSLR.
But the price makes it intriguing!
What camera should I buy if I am to view images on a 72-in 4K flat panel, whilst enjoying enough surplus pixels to do some reasonable zooming? My burning desire is to reproduce the experience of a slide show (Kodachrome 64, Nikon F, FTn, F3, N2000, Nikkor lenses, Leica IIIg, Summitar 1.5, Leitz and Zeiss projectors).
I just can't have any more 13x19-in prints in my life.
DanK7: Sorry - I'm having a grammar moment. "If its manual control points you desire..." should be "If it's manual control points you desire...." Now back to solving world problems.
Ahh. Someone cares.
I take a stringent exception to the 47th "HA."