Shield3

Shield3

Lives in United States OH, United States
Joined on Jul 25, 2011

Comments

Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article 1939: England in Color (part 1) (222 comments in total)

What a great set! Not only is this before the war, it's the last spring/summer before war is declared in September. Just a year after this the Battle of Britain was in full effect over these same skies. I loved this set.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 17:38 UTC as 102nd comment
In reply to:

abortabort: Well seems the sleeping giants of video (Panasonic and Sony) have woken up and they aren't happy that a little upstart (Canon) thinks they can play in their big boy pen, they are going to beat the little upstart within an inch of its little panties and for its belligerent ways going to take some of the upstarts favourite toys in the process (stills camera share).

Canon is the #1 player in DSLR video use. Look at all the stuff shot with the 5d Mark II and III (episodes of House, SNL, parts of movies like Act of Valor, Avengers, 127 hours, etc.). K E you can't really believe your own posts can you? Please let me know all the commercial well known work shot with a Sony DSLR or mirrorless. Answer = none. Why is that? I'm sorry you think framerate supersedes all other camera features, but it doesn't. 24p is cinema, and has been for 100 years. Sure 60p is good for slow motion, but did you notice even Sony didn't include 4k 60p on this camera? Here's some links for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II#Independent_film_and_television
(Almost all Canon): http://nofilmschool.com/2010/01/10-examples-of-stunning-dslr-cinematography/
http://talesfromtheargo.com/6-famous-examples-of-the-dslr-canon-5d-mark-ii-in-hollywood/

Ready for your examples of Sony DSLR's in Hollywood next...:)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 19:07 UTC
In reply to:

abortabort: Well seems the sleeping giants of video (Panasonic and Sony) have woken up and they aren't happy that a little upstart (Canon) thinks they can play in their big boy pen, they are going to beat the little upstart within an inch of its little panties and for its belligerent ways going to take some of the upstarts favourite toys in the process (stills camera share).

Sorry abortabort, Canon is not available for comment - they are too busy lighting cigars with $100 bills from leading the world in DSLR sales for years.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 15:16 UTC

How do 5 people "own this" already?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 14:15 UTC as 21st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

goshigoo: Panasonic is really doing very well recently (except the 42.5 f/1.2, but we can just ignore it since we already have 45 f/1.8)

The recent releases of GM1 / GX7 / GH4 / 15 / 12-32 and the upcoming 35-100 are on the right path of m43; the true spirit of m43
in terms of pricing and portability

I hope we will see a 8mm pancake prime or 9-18mm from panasonic soon

Right Yabookkie - it's either 85/2.4 for $1600 vs 85/3.6 for $300.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 18:05 UTC
In reply to:

Shield3: Not bad for a FF equivalent of 30mm F/3.4.

HowaboutRaw- 15mm x 2 = 30mm. 2x crop factor for m43'rds.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 11:40 UTC
On article Sony Australia releases a3500 with new kit lens (144 comments in total)

Methinks Sony has finally killed the A mount altogether. Haven't seen anything in over a year with the A58.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 19:25 UTC as 56th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Shield3: Not bad for a FF equivalent of 30mm F/3.4.

Revenant - 30mm field of view, F/3.4 for total light gathering, noise level, depth of field, low light performance. I do think of terms in exposure as well and I'm a fan of m43rds (owned several GH2 and GF2's). This lens is what it is - another nice addition to micro 4/3rds. Be nice if it were a pancake like the amazing 20 1.7. Cheers.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 17:58 UTC
In reply to:

Shield3: Not bad for a FF equivalent of 30mm F/3.4.

"Equivalence is such a ridiculous idea" yet the first second anyone heard about this lens they thought "oh, it's like 30mm on FF". If you say you didn't you're lying. Again, not bad for a 30mm F/3.4 equivalent.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 17:52 UTC
In reply to:

Shield3: Not bad for a FF equivalent of 30mm F/3.4.

It's true it has F/1.7 "light intensity" but not GATHERING. How can a 1/4 size sensor "gather" as much light, all things being equal, as a sensor 4x larger?
Thus, the 1.7 m43rds lens "gathers" as much as a full frame F/3.4. For exposure purposes, yep, it's 1.7. For field of view, depth of field and gathering light it's the equivalent of a full frame 3.4 30mm. Not sure why this is so tough. Get a small bucket and one 4x as large and sit them out in the rain. Which one "gathers' more water?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 17:13 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rmel26: This has just made me consider getting the Panasonic 35-100 F2.8 lens for micro 4 3. Since I already have the micro 4 3 bodies, all I really need is a fast zoom in one body and my 20mm in another. I see the 35-100 now selling below 1000 in EBAY. I think this is a better approach for those with micro 4 3 system

@Mike99999 - have you tried the 24/2.8 IS from Canon on FF? It's very light, a stop brighter than F/4, has IS and really sharp wide open.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 15:35 UTC

Not bad for a FF equivalent of 30mm F/3.4.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 15:27 UTC as 36th comment | 22 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

Henry McA: I just compared it with Raws of the Canon G1 X. The Canon files seem to be sharper at all iso settings and noise seems to be finer and less digital. And the Canon is less expensive...

2eyesee is correct. Think of two buckets catching rainwater - the larger bucket is going to gather more water.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 12:01 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shield3: Had Sony put an APS-C sensor in this I'd have bought one.

EsVee - you do know Sony's last "bridge" camera like this had an APS sized sensor right? http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscr1

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 11:57 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review (499 comments in total)

Had Sony put an APS-C sensor in this I'd have bought one.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 02:52 UTC as 110th comment | 7 replies
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review (499 comments in total)

F7.6 equivalent on FF - pretty tough to really blow out the background unless one uses the "zoom in tight" trick. F/8 on my 5d3 and damn near everything is in focus.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 02:50 UTC as 111th comment | 4 replies
On article Nikon D610 Review (386 comments in total)

If you compare this to the 82% rated 5d Mark III, you'll see (according to DPR) that this Nikon D610 "beats" the 5d3 in video mode, yet one cannot even adjust the aperture in live view on the 610.
This 610 beats it in performance, even though the 5d3 has a 61 pt AF system and I can get 30 shot raw burst @ 6FPS with a 1000x CF card. No CF slot on the 610.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 13:29 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4: a quick summary (471 comments in total)

Can I use my Canon EF glass with this? Is the Metabones Speed Booster available for EF to M43?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 13:08 UTC as 40th comment
In reply to:

Photomonkey: Hooray for Sony.
A brilliantly sharp and well made lens for a small amount more than Canon's 2.8 IS offerings. Granted they are not a 50/55 but they are comparable prime configurations.

I hope this signals the beginning of a number of premium lenses from Sony. Considering that Fuji is currently setting the standard for optical excellence and fair pricing for their quality, I am sure that Sony have noticed the accolades for Fuji's line

The Canon 24/28 IS lenses are about half the price of this lens now. $549. Used, $470 range.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 20:24 UTC
On article FroKnowsPhoto's Video Guide on sale (143 comments in total)

Nothing wrong with Jared selling this - any true fan of capitalism can't really be against a guy trying to earn a buck.
What is sort of funny to me, however, is the fact most of us are all shooting digital now - it's not like it costs us anything to delete photos. In other words, teach yourself by doing and practicing. Shrug.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 22, 2013 at 21:12 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »