pellicle

pellicle

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Jan 9, 2007

Comments

Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13

Happens here in Australia too.

Sad really.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2014 at 00:18 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2301 comments in total)
In reply to:

noflashplease: If a Chinese start-up introduced a camera with the same specifications, and yet another (unnecessary) proprietary lens mount, at even 1/10th the price of this Leica, they would be mercilessly mocked and ridiculed. The world doesn't need another proprietary lens mount. I will give JK Imaging the benefit of the doubt for the new "Kodak" Pixpro S-1, if only because it expands upon an existing non-proprietary lens mount. If Leica had followed in the footsteps of Panasonic with a M43 camera, I would applaud them, even with this silly "Made in Germany" sales gimmick.

Maybe it's time for Leica to stop producing any cameras and just concentrate on rebranding Panasonic cameras with (admittedly) improved firmware?

Indeed, its all about how it feels in your hand and naturally the brand. Ouh ouhh it feels solid and premium. Now, let me hold the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 18:06 UTC
In reply to:

Joseph S Wisniewski: A Samsung S4 has a 9.88 watt-hour battery. That's 35568 watt-seconds. To charge that in 26 seconds at 90% efficiency requires 1520W.

Just what everybody wants, a phone that has a 30-pound, $1000 charger that requires exclusive use of a domestic circuit, like a refrigerator does.

Oh, and the phone is a low voltage device. 1520W at 5V is just over 300A. Anyone know a 300A DC connector that's smaller than a cell phone?

Every year or two for the last 12 years, dpReview has ran a 30-second charging battery story. It's sort of the ultimate solution to a problem that doesn't actually exist. Battery technology far outstrips charger technology. 5-10 watt chargers are a practical size, weight, and cost, and 1-2 hours is an acceptable charging time to get that size and weight of a charger.

Wonder what sort of explosion one gets if it shorts? Small hand grenade with chemical mist?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 12:58 UTC

it does look interesting, but I wonder how different it is optically to the Panasonic 14mm f2.5 with the x0.79 adapter? That outfit costs (new) in total something like US$480 and weighs totally 125g (about half). Of course if you already *have* the 14mm its even more attractive to get the GWC1 :-)

samples on my blog
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.fi/2013/10/panasonic-079-wide-adaptor-on-14mm.html

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 14:02 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies

at the risk of being obvious, lenses do work and using them to be capturing less of the scene will always mean that even a basic digicam will beat a high end phone on telephoto. Two years ago I compared my 2009 Nokia E72 to a panasonic digicam. At wide the results are better for the Nokia, but it was clear that I wouldn't even waste my time with zooming.

http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2012/04/nokia-e72-cam-vs-digicam.html

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2014 at 12:49 UTC as 7th comment
On Nikon D4s: CP+ Hands-on and interview article (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: "The AF-on button is now easier to press, and the hand grip is better" just about sums it up.

Why did they bother with so many very minor improvements?

This is a very slightly better camera than a D4, but provides very little reason to upgrade from one. The probably should have waited two more years so they might have some more significant improvements to offer.

> "Why did they bother with so many very minor improvements?"
because the sheep fuss around over meaningless stuff not knowing whats better till they're told, meanwhile the goat is headed for the water hole because it knows where it is ... the sheep follow it

Direct link | Posted on Feb 25, 2014 at 12:04 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4: a quick summary article (471 comments in total)

Quick question. You say "During live view (before a half-press of the shutter button),"

what other view does the GH have?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2014 at 21:17 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)

So, seems Panasonic had the formula RIT from the start. No "faux prism" comments now ...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 20, 2014 at 13:31 UTC as 183rd comment
On Panasonic DMC-GM1 preview (631 comments in total)

err:
"but enters the market with only one lens designed to fit it without tipping over. "

what about the 14mm or the 20mm or even the Oly 17mm all are shorter than this zoom...

perhaps you should re think this and review your review...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 11:43 UTC as 70th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Tomee21: But why 15mm? Why not 12? Or at least 14? Those would make more sense to me than a 30mm equivalent.

as you just observed about the 14mm, Panasonic already makes a lens that fits that range, its the 20mm ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 11:40 UTC
On Dpreview product database now mobile article (39 comments in total)

great stuff. Of course if you didn't put so much clutter on your site in the first place it would load fine on a mobile in low bandwidth.

but its nice to see an alternative happening :-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2012 at 04:53 UTC as 10th comment
On Images of Panasonic GF5 start to appear article (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

adhemar: Long, long ago dPreview made camera reviews. Now they make previews. To-morrow they'll do rumors.

Meet you in the basement.

by the time you get there they'll be gone

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 11:18 UTC
On Preview:olympusEM5 (1364 comments in total)

You say:

"The E-M5 has an eye-sensor to switch automatically between EVF and rear-screen use - something the G3 sorely lacks."

well personally I often turn it off ... when trying to get the camera close to my shirt when shooting from the chest for stability the screen always cuts out

drives me nuts

So sure, say its not there, but don't use "sorely" because not *every* user wants it. Too often jurno's have no clear idea of operation outside their own little view and shove their perspectives out there like they are the word of God

Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56 UTC as 189th comment | 2 replies
Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13