Art lenses, yes, this thing, no way.
This lens will win the mines is bigger then yours contest, along with mines is heavier then yours.
calking: Former U.S. President Bill Clinton coined the phrase, "it depends on what 'is' is" during congressional hearings. With regards to this particular matter of upgrading I would suggest that an upgrade in the photographic equipment realm doesn't mean just a bigger sensor or faster lens or sturdier tripod, etc. in other words, one can "upgrade" by selling his FF gear and going APS-C or m4/3 if it means the new gear will be used more, or for a different purpose that's appropriate.
The problem here is the ongoing perception that bigger and faster are "better", when in fact they're just different. You can dig a hole with a pick and shovel or use a backhoe. It will take longer to do manually versus mechanically, but has the benefit of physical exercise that the excavator cannot provide. If someone is a professional hole digger it would probably make sense to own a backhoe even though it costs much more than a pick and shovel but is necessary in the interest of production for income.
FYI, that statement was in front of a Grand Jury not Congress.
Mond: I think you've missed a trick here. There is no point in buying an expensive, all-dancing-with-bells-on camera if the glass you put in front of it is rubbish. A good camera will not get good shots from bad lenses.
Concentrate on getting the best lens and an affordable camera to go behind it and the results will ten times better than the other way around.
Paul, Look at these two web pages, compare the two lenses, side by side on two browser windows, whether it's vignetting, achromatic distortion, lens distortion, resolution values at three points, the better lens is easy to see. BTW both are measured on FX sensor, FX/DX sensor measurement will be even more dramatic. Simply put, quality cost money, specially true in zooms. BTW I own a couple of the 1.8G primes not the 1.4G, difference between those wasn't anywhere as far apart as these two zooms. So basically it comes down to $ and compromises, compromises does not improve anything. I use DxOMark and Photozone.de to make decisions on purchases. Newest FX sensors demand better glass, period. I started out in DX(D300s) then went to FX(D700, D800).
Adobe can take its CC thingy and stick it in Russia for all I care.
I read with fascination an article two years ago, or so, how Burrow Lens test and calibrates their rental lenses after been rented out. I also know some people are naturally klutz and some treat others property rather poorly. I'll be a cold day in hell before I "rent out" my expensive 70-200 lens to a stranger. ------Hello Mr. Occasional Lens Rental dude, I got some bad news about your lens, they broke into my car and stole the lens I rented from you, sorry dude.
trade: Olympus XZ-1 w/Richard Franiec grip for a Leica M9 + $380.
Phase One is hiring I hear. Newest position that opened up was V.P. of Marketing.
I own a gazzilion dollars(for me it's a chunk of change) of Nikon cameras, lenses, Nikon sync radio triggers and will keep most of it, FF for sure. APS-C might be going buh-bye and will be replaced with Fuji APS-C mirrorless camera. I'm lucky that I didn't buy one of Nikon's nightmare releases with dust on sensor or left focus points problem. I decide not to be a beta tester of new Nikon cameras, I waited till the bugs were fixed and new models were announced and bought older bug free and di$counted versions. Also hate Nikon's f'ing de-content strategy. Yes my avatar is a X-100, tells you were my money will be going in the future.
Cleary the Hassy marketing department is not getting enough light during their winter months.
Way less cost then a Hasselblad Lunar in gold and deerskin.
Wins the equivalent aperture chart hands down, this will be a big seller for Pany. I won't be buying it because I already own too many cameras already. GAS is better then heroin addiction I suppose.
This article should be listed under the Weird Camera News. So that thingy is a mirrorless solution to DSLR's viewfinder ?
Monkey selfie, Mr. Slater claimed it was a monkey selfie, as in the monkey pressed the shutter button, end of story as to who was the photographer.
Rocky Mtn Old Boy: The monkey cannot own the copyright, so in all likelihood, it falls to Slater - though given the nature of his recent behaviour, does not deserve it. I think the one thing we can all agree on, is that Wikimedia doesn't have it. Slater is the closest thing to an owner and since he PP'd and posted the photos, he likely has the right to ask them to take the images down.
He's a knob for doing so... but ultimately has the right.
" I think the one thing we can all agree on, is that Wikimedia doesn't have it. "
No, not everyone is agreeing with your point.
120 to 35: The photos are conceptual art.
Copyright belongs to the artist. In conceptual art, the artist does not usually create the work himself. He provides the concept, gets his associates to produce the work, and presents the end results as his work. The photographer is the conceptual artist who made the monkey take the pictures with his camera. He therefore owns the copyright.
"The photographer is the conceptual artist who made the monkey take the pictures with his camera."- - No he did not make the monkey take the photographs, the monkey was handling the camera and accidentally took many images(100 or so) that were worthless and this one by chance. Sorry I'm a facts guy and many post here have false "facts" including yours.
From Huffington Post article: He added that he believes Wikipedia editors, most of whom are volunteers, "have a communistic view of life."
"It's potentially being run by people with political agendas," Slater said of Wikipedia. "The people who are editing it could be a new Adolf Hitler or a new Stalin ... They're using whatever suits their agenda."
He urged people to stop using Wikipedia. "It's important to tell people that Wikipedia should be not used as a source of truth," he said.____
I'm sort of speechless.
IMHO the real monkey is the author, so Wiki is correct. My 0.02 cents.
LOL very creative.
D810 will be a great DSLR, just be aware you need good glass, need to use good camera handling in order to get the best out of the 36.3MP sensor. The ultra resolution will be diminished by low shutter speed if not mounted on a tripod if you break the one over focal leanth-shutter rule or VR lens isn't used.
Here is a great article on diffraction by Thom Hogan http://www.dslrbodies.com/accessories/camera-accessories/nikon-d800-accessories/d800-lens-sets.html