alcaher: The message could be a clue or they just wrote that just to capture the big attention of the canon users.
so maybe is the long waited 100-400mm lens update which is a extremly popular lens and its meant to be use with the new 7dmark2
or +40 Megapixel FF box camera for who know how much!
Seeing the actual ad, and link to Canon USA - this isn't "NY only..." Making all the word (which are probably derived from comments on sites like this one), make sense with regard to the 100-400, but the chatter about a 1DXs is interesting (although possibly a 1D announcement would be a bit premature given the 7DmkII release).
Indeed, all those words can be applied to Canon with regard to the its not releasing an update to the 100-400; but Mr. Gurdes is right, if this is a NY-only ad, not likely.
Unless I am caught in a time warp, Sony has introduced an RX-100 Mark III (and I have one!). Editors missed that the article describes the RX-100... Mark II. Unfortunately, you conclude on a slightly sour tone, but miss the point about this camera, the IQ. Maybe that's a problem with 'First Impression' articles, where you are constrained to not discuss the image. Then again, maybe the image isn't 'mind-blowing' or take it out of the 'middle ground.'
Would be kinda fun shooting video through this rig. I can imagine showing up on a movie set with it and getting some interesting looks.
Can I just say how disheartening it is to see a site dedicated to photography respond to a portfolio with such utterly senseless commentary. Some of these are interesting photos. It might be worth taking a moment and thinking about his work, rather than offhandedly trashing it. His exploration with the Xerox is smart and creative (indeed, I had to go to his site to understand what he was doing and why it was worth a look, which is something that could have been explained here). The vitriol that has taken over this site's comments is really come to a new low. Anyone who posts an unsubstantiated comment like "junk" should post a link to their images for fair critique. What does "junk" add to understanding? For the student or the viewer? I'm not for censorship, but please, if you are just going to be rude and thoughtless, go somewhere else.
Wow... Seems like the perfect social camera for 2014 for those ready for a step up from the phone's camera (try shooting your favorite singer on stage, a shot out of a car window while traveling, or your cat in the shower). Put on a wide, pocketable, bright prime and party. Put on the zoom and head to a concert. The market for this isn't hard to figure out. Kids (broadly defined) are tech savvy enough to change lenses. Physics seem to be keeping the zoom lens the size it is, but this is a harbinger of what the Kodak Brownie of the Internet age will look like (just add a video phone).
Anyone know what the car is? What a fun-loving family!
love_them_all: I always preferred Calumet over Samy's in the LA area. The staff of Samy's had done numerous unethical transactions to my friends and I back in the days. They over charged us on used equipment and used high pressure sales techniques on things we didn't need. Back then we were students and didn't know better. Then I discovered Calumet and never turned back. Their rental house is one of the best in LA.
Several years ago I moved from Los Angeles, but return there twice a year. I inevitably end up in Samy's for something on every trip and have shopped there for nearly 30 years without anything unethical - it's a pretty shocking, and unfair, charge. I've shopped there, Calumet and Bel Air for years. Unlike love_them_all, I did like them all, but especially Samy's and Bel Air. Calumet had generally higher over the counter prices with less stock on hand and sometimes not the most helpful staff, never saw it busy, which said a lot.
tim_b: reminds me of tent poles...
My first reaction - the tent pole design. And for those concerned about how rugged, my tent's about 15 years old and gets plenty of use.
TrojMacReady: For those who complain about missing vocals, here's a more vocal example:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OB0n-xkvY7A#!
Joesiv, from a lapsed-recording engineer's perspective, your last paragraph is great, succinct analogy.
Curious to know if this photo was altered or is the depth-of-field and curved character of the background blur due to the shape of the trees (and an interesting optical illusion) or some editing.
Vegasus: I am not a pro photographer, and every time there is a new SLR, i am only interest in low lights capability, dual memory cards, large screen with million dots and face detection for focusing.
and every time i visit this website i expect new product, but after 5 years knowing about this website,... i think those top manufactures making cameras is like buying a car... same car with lotsa variants. 4 cyl, v6 or v8 engine wif same body.
To your interest, at DP review you can in one location follow the improvements in each area - low light sensitivity, features such as dual memory cards, etc. They are the same in the same way as you can now get 200hp out of a 2.0 litre car, when 10 years ago the horse power was far less. The interesting thing is to see the technology advance. You purchase at a point where you need the technology AND the technology meets your needs. I think of it as a great window on the advances (and limitation) of current technology.
ybizzle: $399? Buy a Canon T3 and call it a day...
Compare the image quality of the T3 to the Sony NEX-5n or 7 and you will understand where the difference lies. The dollar figure is only one aspect to the equation.
Some reviews have observed poor battery performance/power consumption. Did you experience this? Also, you note the camera is slightly faster than S90/S95, any observation regarding shutter lag?