I dont think about real or fake as i do not agree with photo editing software unless it is traceable.Some people say it is creativity but i still dont agree. Thats what comes out you cannot determine real from fake not even in competitions magazines and even newspapers. Photography is ruined with photo editing software. Good luck digital artists !!
At last Canon made it. Now it is the turn for the Nikon. I am not sure about the megapixel vs the sensor size in terms of Image Quality.
There is no comparision between the Nikon D800 and the nokia 808. There are some issues concerning a full frame with 36mp regarding image quality . Immagine a 1/2" sensor with 41mp . Maybe it is good but i dought it. If it is good i will buy one. to have a 41mp with you all the time is good as you'll never miss a shot.
36mp is good for those who uses prime lenses as there would be a room for cropping. the only thing i am not sure about the pixel-per-pixel sharpness like the D700. I think Nikon has to coach d800e users in order to nearly eliminate the case of moire effect. Maybe the D800 will be the same sharpness as the D700 and the D800e with much more sharpness.
Very good camera in terms of IQ ,focus and even white balance. When used with the fmount it become abit slower almost good. Image quality comparable with D300. The only problem is that of wide angle lenses. I think Nikon has to think about it !!! I really enjoyed taking photos with the Nikon J1 . If it was a 20 mp it would be much much better
I am a bit surprised about this camera. If it is used for studio photography imo i think an 18- 22 mp would be better as to upgrade from 12 mp is not that much and in terms of sports you need a long lens like 600 F4 or else you need to crop. Maybe it is good for low light photography that would be nice.