great ideas come from some bad ones or so called bad ones and lessons are learnt but only when you put something into production do you realize it was perhaps not the best thing to do...but you take risks and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. good on pentax for sticking their neck out.
Direct link |
Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 15:34:12 UTC
as 56th comment
JacquesBalthazar: These Fuji X offers, this one in particular, are so tempting for old but increasingly broke leicaphiles such as me. So familiar and re-assuring. At the same time, they annoy me by playing this much on the retro/pseudo vintage chords in terms of design cues. This is 2013. Why are we trying to pretend to be in 1956?
The feature list and tech innards are fantastic. But the design references....am I the only one to be bothered?
and built (like a tank) like its 1956.I love it
Direct link |
Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 09:03:38 UTC
Lets how the hands on review compares to the the X100 first. New specs look good but will it improve the camera..I certainly hope so :) In anycase its nice to see that this line is continuing and rightly so. Love my X100 and its trials and tribulations.
Direct link |
Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 08:55:00 UTC
as 66th comment
citrontokyo: The only way to make this interesting is to say that people must vote for a camera that they don't have (preferably a different maker, too). Otherwise, it's just another boring popularity contest.
I shoot Pentax, but vote for the Sony Rx1. It's true camera porn for me.
Ya thought it would become a Canon V Nikon contest but Olympus is upsetting the party too. Rx1 from me too
Direct link |
Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 09:32:57 UTC
Related to the subject at hand. The images look wonderful. I just have gotten so used to the Evf/Ovf on the X100 I really think the X-Pro 1 is more attractive, perhaps slightly larger but a necessity all the same for me.
Direct link |
Posted on Dec 11, 2012 at 15:11:10 UTC
as 33rd comment
I just not have used it at all. Im sure it has potential but i just feel google was a little late on the scene and people got comfortable with FB if you into all that.
Direct link |
Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 14:41:42 UTC
as 3rd comment
geoffreyc: This has made my mind up - I'm getting another 7D!
Only useful feature for me is the addition of GPS - price of that (GP-E2) + 7D body + grip still cheaper than 6D and my 100-400L will have more reach than using on FF body.
I just love the 7D specs only..the low light is just not up scratch for me.It depends what you use it most for.
Direct link |
Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 09:31:56 UTC
Different style of shooting ..not my style but pretty interesting motionless toy like people. Comparing these with Iphone images is laughable.
great ideas come from some bad ones or so called bad ones and lessons are learnt but only when you put something into production do you realize it was perhaps not the best thing to do...but you take risks and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. good on pentax for sticking their neck out.
Smile !! ah wait..incoming call
Jeff Greenberg: No more Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians.
No light skin or dark skin.
Its official, everyone is orange.
Excellent lol
is this done with the wide angle attachment..nice pic btw
digitalanalog: If Nikon and Canon won't start to make retro-designed cameras ...
In terms of build quality what Nikon and Canon have offered so far in their mirrorless cameras is laughable in comparison to the X series.
JacquesBalthazar: These Fuji X offers, this one in particular, are so tempting for old but increasingly broke leicaphiles such as me. So familiar and re-assuring. At the same time, they annoy me by playing this much on the retro/pseudo vintage chords in terms of design cues. This is 2013. Why are we trying to pretend to be in 1956?
The feature list and tech innards are fantastic. But the design references....am I the only one to be bothered?
and built (like a tank) like its 1956.I love it
whlcalifornia: I want full frame!
I like the size of this camera. I dont think FF is necessary. The IQ is great.
Lets how the hands on review compares to the the X100 first. New specs look good but will it improve the camera..I certainly hope so :) In anycase its nice to see that this line is continuing and rightly so. Love my X100 and its trials and tribulations.
citrontokyo: The only way to make this interesting is to say that people must vote for a camera that they don't have (preferably a different maker, too). Otherwise, it's just another boring popularity contest.
I shoot Pentax, but vote for the Sony Rx1. It's true camera porn for me.
Ya thought it would become a Canon V Nikon contest but Olympus is upsetting the party too. Rx1 from me too
Related to the subject at hand. The images look wonderful. I just have gotten so used to the Evf/Ovf on the X100 I really think the X-Pro 1 is more attractive, perhaps slightly larger but a necessity all the same for me.
I just not have used it at all. Im sure it has potential but i just feel google was a little late on the scene and people got comfortable with FB if you into all that.
Great list DPR keep up the excellent work....wow this thread is just pure comedy.
very nice
Well I'm impressed.
maxnimo: I'm confused by all the "ugly" comments. Is this camera supposed to be framed and hung on a gallery wall next to Mona Lisa?
Agreed. For me it looks balanced and hefty. Unlike the NEX series. I think most lenses will feel at home on this body. Very tempting indeed .
super shot
bookmarked and keeping an eye with a view to latching on.
Will take some getting used to. Looks clean and fresh at first glance. But for some reason seams less 'inviting'..
geoffreyc: This has made my mind up - I'm getting another 7D!
Only useful feature for me is the addition of GPS - price of that (GP-E2) + 7D body + grip still cheaper than 6D and my 100-400L will have more reach than using on FF body.
I just love the 7D specs only..the low light is just not up scratch for me.It depends what you use it most for.