safeashouses

Joined on Sep 16, 2010

Comments

Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Chaitanya S: Its nice to see that Olympus slowed down the upgrade cycle, also they didnt drop the value of older em-5 over its life cycle. Eagre to see the reviews of new camera soon.

He would have to stop dreaming to do all that.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 15:39 UTC
In reply to:

FocusBogus: OM-D E-M5 II? How creative again... Why not simply OM-D6?

OK, it is a nice camera with high res mode.

Yeah, Yahoo News said they folded last year. Somebody should tell Olympus.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 15:35 UTC
On article Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gesture: The body alone should be no more than $300.

Why not $100?

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 06:04 UTC
On article Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

richteed: Apart from the control dial, it's not really offering me much more than my epl-3, which I love. Looks like I'll be waiting for the epl-8 or maybe getting a secondhand omd5. C'mon Olympus ... It's high time you started innovating again or I might just jump ship to panasonic or Sony.

Please jump!

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 05:34 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2096 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: That large and no flash, no LCD screen that does selfies. I'd rather a PL5 with VF4.

I'm sure there are cheaper ways to satisfy your selfie needs. PL5 with a VF4? Go for it!

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 16:22 UTC
In reply to:

nathondetroit: Olympus had one shot, and that was a 17mm 1.8 kit @ $999.

$1450 can get you a better sensor and viewfinder in the X100s, or get you started with a body+fast prime in any number of DLSR lineups… It just doesn't make sense to pay such a premium for less image quality.

nathondetroit Dude you just saved yourself $1400 you should be happy and shut up about it. Now go shoot something with your cheaper yet better camera.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 23:45 UTC
On article Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview (315 comments in total)
In reply to:

BJN: Meh. You get a more compact camera only if you don't use the add-on EVF. If you do, you have a bigger, bulkier package. And you have fiddly caps that need to cover the vulnerable accessory port behind the hotshoe and the protruding connector below the EVF. Unless you never or rarely intend to use an EVF, go for the better integrated E-M5.

Being the Best is not always the most popular. Is that what you meant to say?

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 23:26 UTC
On article Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview (315 comments in total)
In reply to:

igorek7: OMD - evf + wifi + 1/8000 + peaking + a few more new features. However, the same "vintage" design, the same lack of improvements in video, the same idea that starting price should be twice more than expected.
Fortunately, the micro four thirds system provides a good choice of the alternative cameras.

This would be really great for $100 but at $1000 it's only great. Someone buy me one so I can stop posting how much it cost... um, how broke I am.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 23:19 UTC
On article Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview (315 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ybor: OMG...this camera (even at this price) would have been great about a year ago. To introduce as they have makes it no better than Panasonic putting GH3 sensor into latest down the chain model, making it so yesterday. Add to this that the price is about $100 higher than I anticipated. That said, the kit with the evf and 17 1.8 for $1,499 is a pretty fair deal (even with the not so sharp lens that it is).

If only this would cause a price reduction in the OM-D...like down to $799 for body.

What i really, really meant was...

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 23:15 UTC
On article Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview (315 comments in total)
In reply to:

iShootWideOpen: It will be half price in a few months.

That really only works for food.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 23:13 UTC
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: I think this is the right time for Olympus and Panasonic to think about FF cameras.
In the long run, there is no way for 4/3 to compete with FF cameras.

Too deep for...?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 22:26 UTC
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valentinian: Question: why there are no full size mirrorless cameras?

They are full size.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 01:55 UTC
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: lovely.. its interesting to see how Oly and Fuji are matching their camera specs to specs. earlier their enthusiast compacts X10 and XZ-1 and now this one against F770exr

What are you "just saying" (?) Fujifilm's F770EXR about $320.00 Olympus SZ-12 about $ 179.00. Who woulda thunk one was better than the other... oh, you thunk it alright. Thanks for your insight.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2012 at 01:23 UTC
On photo Metro Station III in the Olympus OMD challenge (4 comments in total)

Super Duper nice shot. Which metro is this?

Link | Posted on May 7, 2012 at 07:13 UTC as 4th comment
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

Diopter: It must be a wonderful tool for a demanding photographer as many previous advanced cameras from the Olympus.
But the styling is none! Ugly, chaotic box with unconvincing "retro" pretenses.

35mm was never "top of the game" in the day. I worked and shot in car studios 'back in the day'. 35mm was there but really not a starter, never first team, never ever top of the game. what ever that is supposed to mean.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2012 at 19:17 UTC
On article First impressions shooting with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (269 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: I think i'd rather have the Fuji X1-pro than this one. micro43 just feels too small for me.

He's a master at it. Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 06:08 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (215 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: "A few months away from being finished" sounds suspiciously like, "They've run out of money and we don't know when it will be available" to me. I'm done with new Olympus gear.

Are you done enough to stop telling all of us about every time Olympus comes out with a new camera? Not that done!?!

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 05:43 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (215 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: The color are nice under an overcast but the ISO 8000 image are not very impressive. Even down-sampled the noise are blotchy.

I also don't understand why the camera is still at version 0.95 when D800 with finalized firmware has been in the hand of pro shooters for the past few months. It seems like D800 will hit the ground shooting while E-M5 will spend a few months getting through its teething period before version 1.01.

@Peiasdf "I went Nikon for safety..." That's all I needed to hear, I mean that's all you needed to say.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 05:40 UTC
In reply to:

ARTASHES: It could have a built-in flash in that huge "pseudo" house for pentaprism.

And yet it doesn't. How will you live now?

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2012 at 22:58 UTC
In reply to:

Mtsuoka: On second thought this Film era SLR design is kind of old fashioned.
reminds me of the old film SLRS
I'd still prefer the RF styling

Yeah, looks kinda retro to me. Does anybody else see that?

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2012 at 22:48 UTC
Total: 35, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »