Gabriele Sartori: I don't know who need this camera. Probably because I own a M 240 and a few lenses but I just can't understand why people need this.
People maybe don't have the money for that gear you have?People maybe go for the 80/20 or 90/10 rule where 28mm and crop mode 35 and 50 will do?People may think a Q is handier than a M240?People, in general, are fed up replacing lenses and carry a lot of weight?People, in general, are 'point & shoot' photographers.Some people want quality and pay extra for the brand.
Maybe it's usable for porn movies that we cropped can see the sperms?
Interesting to read all comments here? Especially regarding the Sony RX100 3?I also read comments why not Richo GR is mentioned?I have a dream though, a Sony RX100 with a new house in line with GR which has the best grip among P&S cameras. I should know as having one. 28mm equivalent and need for zoom? Not necessary I think? Cropping works and we must walk close to the target för a minor background blur.A dream of course for GR? An electronic viewfinder in par with Sony RX100.
Cailean Gallimore: Another one for the vanity market.
According to Steve Huff (well known?) Leica will charge USD200 more than for the equivalent Panasonic, however offer more software and warranties.
dual12: I'm not interested in a camera like this, but if I was interested, I'd buy the Panasonic. I don't see any good reasons to buy the Leica. I couldn't care less about the brand. Moreover, to me, the Leica brand stands for way, way overpriced. I consider it a sucker's brand.
Who would consider you as a fool? The fan boys of pro cameras?Other people don't care.
rfstudio: why is this brand still expensive when the technology is dirt cheap as it is ? what a hype !!!! you got 10 times better quality from 5D mark 3 then leica for a fraction of a price
A price is always 'right' as long customers are willing to pay the price and all items are sold. Can we price a feeling?