shady1991

Joined on Jul 10, 2011

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On photo ISO-640-DSC00341-ACR in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

People, don't you see the picture is underexposed (or you can say properly exposed for the sky). At least there is +4ev brightening applied for shadows here as I see and of course there will be much noise. No one should expect better Dynamic range from ISO 640. I think the test doesn't make much sense though. If it's DR test it should be at Base ISO and if It is noise test then It shouldn't be overprocessed.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 18:27 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Sony a7 II Real-world Samples sample gallery (5 comments in total)

People, don't you see the picture is underexposed (or you can say properly exposed for the sky). At least there is +4ev brightening applied for shadows here as I see and of course there will be much noise. No one should expect better Dynamic range from ISO 640. I think the test doesn't make much sense though. If it's DR test it should be at Base ISO and if It is noise test then It shouldn't be overprocessed.

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 18:27 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Sony announces SLT-A58 20MP mid-level DSLR-style camera (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

shady1991: They should name it A44. A5X cameras were excellently balanced between price and quality and now everything's messed up.
they shouldn't downgrade screen or video fps if they want to compete with d5200. I won't be surprised even if they decreased buffer size.
I think everything should be solid and good quality in A5X series like is in my a57.
now You buy a58 and you get world's greatest evf but you're distracted buy very cheap feeling of worst screen ever.

Lol .you know I was talking about EVF but maybe you feel happy to correct people one letter mistakes.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 13:24 UTC
On article Sony announces SLT-A58 20MP mid-level DSLR-style camera (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

shady1991: They should name it A44. A5X cameras were excellently balanced between price and quality and now everything's messed up.
they shouldn't downgrade screen or video fps if they want to compete with d5200. I won't be surprised even if they decreased buffer size.
I think everything should be solid and good quality in A5X series like is in my a57.
now You buy a58 and you get world's greatest evf but you're distracted buy very cheap feeling of worst screen ever.

Plastek:
I've seen a37 LCD and I've seen A77 OVF. and if you don't know sony enough and if you think that they would realease another alike LDC or EVF then you should't talk about my age or experience :)))

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 10:00 UTC
On article Sony announces SLT-A58 20MP mid-level DSLR-style camera (128 comments in total)

They should name it A44. A5X cameras were excellently balanced between price and quality and now everything's messed up.
they shouldn't downgrade screen or video fps if they want to compete with d5200. I won't be surprised even if they decreased buffer size.
I think everything should be solid and good quality in A5X series like is in my a57.
now You buy a58 and you get world's greatest evf but you're distracted buy very cheap feeling of worst screen ever.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 09:50 UTC as 32nd comment | 11 replies
In reply to:

Sad Joe: Another nail in the coffin of 'real cameras' - smart phone devices will kill off DSLR's just as digital killed off film - only a matter of time.

Companies like Sony will invest massive amounts of monies as items like the IPad, IPhone as its where the money is...

A Canon branded camera phone anyone ?

its theoritically impossible. maybe someday image quality of mobile phones (even in low light) will match to slrs, but you'll never get deep blurred backgrounds and shallow dof with small sensor, and thats major beauty of photography imho.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2012 at 16:51 UTC
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6